Cost
Benefit of Vaccines and Medication - Nickels and Dimes?
| Author: | Summarized
Janet Alsop - Veterinarian Disease Prevention - Swine/OMAFRA
| | Creation Date: | 05
June 2009 | | Last Reviewed: |
05 June 2009 |
Presented
by Dr. Greg Wideman at the 2009 London Swine Conference. Recently,
low market prices have resulted in Ontario producers applying increasing focus
to input costs. Although not one of the major cost centres in swine production
(health-related costs per pig for a typical farrow-to-finish farm in Ontario have
been estimated at 4.5% of the total cost of production), there are opportunities
to review and reduce costs. Much of the variation in health cost among farms is
due to differences in productivity, health status, and business goals, but, in
addition, costs may also vary because a critical review of health spending has
not been undertaken. Some questions
to ask your veterinarian:Is
there a lower-cost alternative product? There
is a wide range in the cost of commercial swine vaccines. Efficacy comparisons
of vaccines, when available, are not usually based on randomized clinical trials
and comparisons are equivocal regarding the real economic differences between
vaccines. However, on some farms, for some diseases, changing to a lower-cost
vaccine is an option, especially if the disease challenge is low. With regard
to treatment options, selecting a lower cost injectable antibiotic as the primary
treatment can significantly reduce cost, especially in disease-challenged finishing
herds. Of course, these decisions should always be made carefully, in consultation
with the herd veterinarian. Where
is the best value for my animal health spending? Improvements
in pig health and performance have been significant with the widespread use of
porcine circovirus vaccines. The cost benefit ratio for PCV2 vaccine use is positive,
even for farms with minimal evidence of clinical disease. There does not appear
to be a standard approach to PCV2 vaccine protocols; there are significant differences
between commercial products which make vaccine selection a critical point at which
a producer needs to involve his/her veterinarian. With
regard to feed antibiotics, feed budgets should be reviewed on a routine basis
to minimize cost without impacting productivity. A simple spreadsheet can assist
in guiding feed medication decisions as feed prices change. What
should I be spending on veterinary inputs? Veterinary
costs should be routinely reviewed in order to ensure that:
- The
volume of purchases correlates to pig inventory (i.e., doses of iron purchased
versus number of pigs born).
- Ineffective,
costly products are removed from the farm's animal health plan.
- Opportunities
to add value through new health products are explored.
- Health
care cost per pig is in line with other similar production units (i.e. benchmarking).
This
review can be conveniently incorporated into the CQA validation process, when
producers and veterinarian are already reviewing animal health products from the
food safety perspective. There are opportunities to reduce veterinary costs in most
swine operations; however changes need to be evaluated carefully since any change
that reduces productivity will cause costs to increase. Related
Links June
2009 Pork News & Views - Table of Contents For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|