Estimated
Breeding Value: A Tool for Genetic Improvement of Swine
 |
| Agdex#: |
440/42 |
| Publication Date: |
01/88 |
| Order#: |
88-014 |
| Last Reviewed: |
08/03 |
| History: |
Original Factsheet |
| Written by: |
Cathy Aker - Swine Specialist/Orangeville;
B. W. Kennedy - Animal & Poultry Science/University of Guelph |
Table of Contents
- Performance Testing of Swine
- The Canadian Swine Genetic Evaluation Program
- Estimated Breeding Values
- Sire and Dam Report
- Herd Activity Monitor
- Using EBV's
The performance of any animal is determined primarily by two factors
- genetics and environment (management). Often environment can affect
an animal's performance as much or more so than the animal's genetic
make-up. The key to genetic improvement of livestock is to distinguish
between genetic and environmental factors influencing performance and
select only those animals which are genetically superior. Performance
that is the result of good management will not be passed on to the next
generation, whereas performance due to genetic superiority will be repeated.
Performance Testing of Swine
Supervised performance testing of swine began in 1967 with the development
of the Record of Performance (ROP) Swine Testing Program. Its purpose
was to help pork producers to identify and select superior replacement
breeding stock.
Through the ROP Program, breeders have been provided with performance
test information on pigs tested either on the home farm or at a central
test station. Central testing has provided performance comparisons of
young boars from a number of different herds. All boars are tested under
similar environmental and management conditions, therefore, differences
in performance can be attributed to genetics rather than herd management.
The central test station also gives an indication of the genetic merit
of a herd relative to other herds in the province using the test station.
The number of boars that can be tested each year, however, is limited
to approximately 1500. The home test component allows performance testing
of larger numbers of young boars and gilts. Home test evaluations have
been of limited value because comparisons of breeding stock are valid
only for the herd in which the pig was raised. The comparisons are only
valid within a herd because evaluations for each pig are expressed relative
to the average performance of all pigs in that herd only, and herds
can differ greatly in genetic merit and management (environmental) conditions.
Performance test information, generated either on the farm or at the
test station was based strictly on the pigs own performance and did
not take into account information on tested relatives. Information on
related animals is useful in determining the genetic merit of a pig,
together with the pigs own performance data. Because related animals
are similar in their genetic make-up, their test results can also be
used to predict an animal's genetic worth.
The Canadian Swine Genetic Evaluation Program
To overcome these limitations, the Canadian Swine Genetic Evaluation
Program was developed in 1985. It provides pork producers with Estimated
Breeding Values (EBV's) for backfat thickness and days to 90 kg on performance
tested pigs. EBV's are estimates of the genetic (breeding) values of
an animal for a particular trait.
Estimated Breeding Values
Estimated Breeding Values are simply an extension of the ROP Program.
Data are collected in the same way; however, the analysis of the data
is quite different. EBV's take into account the following factors:
- the heritability of the trait, or that part of a trait that is expected
to be inherited;
- the amount of information available on each boar or sow i.e. number
of relatives as well as number of progeny, number of litters, and
number of herds;
- the genetic merit of the herd in which the pig was raised; and
- the genetic trend (change) in the breed over time for all ROP-tested
pigs in the region (Ontario).
EBV's take into account performance information (backfat and days to
90 kg) on the individual as well as all related animals (sire, dam,
littermates, etc.) and progeny as their test information becomes available.
The more information that is available on related animals, the greater
the accuracy of the EBV. This is referred to as 'repeatability'. Theoretically
repeatability values can range from 0 to 100% but in practice published
values on sires and dams will range between 45 to 99%. The higher the
repeatability value, the more accurate is its EBV. For example, sires
with many progeny will have repeatability values approaching 99%. As
performance information becomes available on progeny, the importance
of the animal's own record as well as records on its other relatives
diminish since the performance that the selected animal has passed on
to its progeny becomes the most important factor.
EBV's also account for the effect of management on an animal's performance.
This is achieved through the use of genetic links between herds. Genetic
links are created through the use of artificial insemination, the central
test station and the sale of breeding stock from one herd to another.
Through these methods, animals of a related genetic background are raised
in different herds, thus herds become "linked". Because EBV's
account separately for the effects of environment and genetics, the
management effect can be removed, allowing valid comparisons of breeding
stock in different herds. This means that an individual can be compared
genetically to all other ROP tested pigs of the same breed.
The Canadian Swine Genetic Evolution Program provides producers with
two valuable reports:
(1) Sire and Dam Report
(2) Herd Activity Monitor
| Top of Page |
Sire and Dam Report
A separate sire and dam report is produced for each breed (Yorkshire,
Landrace, Hampshire, Duroc, Lacombe) and region (Maritimes, Quebec,
Ontario, Western). To be listed in the report a boar or sow must meet
the following criteria:
(1) the animal must have a complete identification, including herd
letters, pig number and year letter (according to Canadian National
Livestock Records); and
(2) must have at least 1 progeny and a repeatability on EBV index of
at least 45%.
The report lists animals identification, EBV's for backfat thickness
and days to 90 kg, as well as an index combining EBV's for backfat and
days and its repeatability. The report also lists for each breeding
animal the number of progeny tested, the number of litters and the number
of herds (including the test station) in which progeny were tested.
The last herd in which the sire or dam had progeny is also given. EBV's
are expressed relative to the average of all pigs of the same breed
born and tested in ROP herds within the last two years. Because the
goal is to reduce backfat and days to 90 kg, sires and dams with negative
EBV's are breed improvers. Their use will result in a decrease in backfat
and/or days. The EBV index is useful for breeders who wish to select
for growth rate and backfat thickness at the same time. The traits are
weighted so that a change of 1 mm in backfat has approximately the same
value as a change of 4 days in growth rate. The average index for each
breed is 100, but the average,in genetically superior herds will be
greater than 100 and the average in genetically poorer herds, will be
less than 100.
Sire and dam reports are published quarterly and are provided to all
producers enrolled on the ROP Program. Additional copies can be obtained
from: Supervisor, Sheep and Swine Performance Testing, Guelph Agriculture
Centre, Box 1030, Guelph, Ontario, MIH 6Nl Phone: (519) 836-3560.
Herd Activity Monitor
The Herd Activity Monitor (HAM) is a confidential report provided to
each ROP breeder on a quarterly basis. This report allows the breeder
to assess genetic and management progress in the herd. The report lists
the number of pigs tested in the last two years as well as the average
EBV of pigs tested during this time period (compared to all other ROP
herds in the region). The report also gives a measure of environmental
or management performance of the herd, both in absolute terms and relative
to the average herd. Trends in genetic and management performance over
time are also given based on six-month periods. These trends can be
used as an indicator of the effectiveness of a breeding program, provided
that reasonable numbers of pigs are tested in each six-month period.
The trends are also useful for determining the results of a change in
management.
| Top of Page |
Using EBV'S
The Canadian Swine Genetic Evaluation Program provides breeders and
commercial producers with a means of identifying and selecting genetically
superior breeding stock. Because EBV's account for the effect of management
on an animal's performance, the selection of breeding stock is greatly
simplified. Within a breed and region (i.e. Ontario), comparisons can
be made between all pigs in ROP-tested herds. Prior to the development
and use of EBV'S, accurate comparisons of breeding stock in different
herds could not be made. The environment under which the animal was
raised was not accounted for. Therefore an animal's performance could
not be attributed strictly to genetics or management but some combination
of the two factors. Genetic improvement results from the selection and
use of genetically superior animals, not animals that have been raised
under ideal management conditions. Table 1 compares two methods of selection
of breeding stock - one using the traditional ROP Index and other, the
EBV Index.
Accurate selection of breeding stock is only the first step. Designing
an effective breeding program is essential for the selection process
to be of any benefit. EBV's can be used by breeders to predict the outcome
of a specific mating. By simply averaging the EBV's of the parents the
genetic merit (value) of the progeny can be determined. An example is
given in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Genetic (Breeding) Value of progeny
from mating a boar with an EBV of -6.0 days and a sow with an EBV of
-2.0 days.Not all progeny would have a genetic value of -4.0, however
over a large number of matings the progeny would, on average take 4
days less to reach 90 kg than progeny of parents with breed average.
Table 1a. Two Methods of Comparing Home-Tested Boars.
Given only this information on home-tested boars
| Boars |
Measured Backfat |
Measured Days to 90 kg |
Phenotypic Index |
| A |
10.8 mm
|
131 Days
|
139
|
| B |
12.5 mm
|
134 Days
|
126
|
Which boar is likely superior? * If both boars are from
the same herd? 'A'
Why? Because of lower backfat fewer days to 90 kg and
higher overall index in the same herd.
Why? Given only this information it cannot be determined
whether Boar A's apparent superiority is due to his genetic make-up
or the management of the herd under which he was raised.
Table 1b. Two Methods of Comparing Home-Tested Boars.
Given this additional information on the same boars
| Boars |
EBV Backfat |
EBV Days to 90 kg |
EBV Index |
| A |
-0.6 mm
|
+0.2 Days
|
112
|
| B |
-2.0 mm
|
-3.5 Days
|
149
|
Which boar is likely superior? 'B'
Why? Because of better EBV's for backfat and days to
90 kg and a resulting higher EBV Index.
Comments: It can now be concluded that Boar A's apparent
superiority in Example 1 was due to good management. Boar B is actually
genetically superior, but poor management prevented him from showing
his true potential. His genetic potential will be passed on to his
progeny, however. Had Boar A been selected over Boar B on the basis
of his performance figures as in Example 1, a genetic error would
likely have been made.
Breeding programs must be evaluated on a regular basis in order to
determine their effectiveness, Breeders can use the Herd Activity Monitor
(HAM) to assess their breeding strategies. The HAM lists trends in genetic
performance over time, indicating the amount of genetic improvement,
or lack of it, in the breeder's herd. Similar trends are given for management
performance, allowing the breeder to determine the effectiveness of
management practices in the herd.
The Canadian Swine Genetic Evaluation Program will also allow evaluation
of current breeding practices and testing programs on a national level.
Routine monitoring of genetic trends (genetic change) in performance
- tested breeding stock ensures continued genetic improvement for the
entire industry.
| Top of Page |
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|