Benchmarks for a Good Lamb Crop
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Transitional Pre-breeding (August - September)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Transitional Post-breeding (February - April) | |
|
|
| Anestrus Period (May - August) | |
|
|
Replacement ewe lambs begin cycling later and quit cycling sooner compared to mature ewes. Subsequently, expected conception rates and lambing percentages will be lower for them, and more so, during the transitional periods.
If it is the intention to keep lambs from first time lambers as flock replacements it is recommended that these first time lambers are run, and managed as a separate flock. Here are a few important reasons:
Their lambs are at a distinct disadvantage to reaching targets by breeding
time. Considerations of early weaning, or creep feeding can help offset
these challenges.
Producers who are unable to manage the replacement ewe lambs separately might consider using a terminal breed ram of small to medium size for breeding to improve survival and growth rates of lambs.
For the most part, any differences in the performance targets listed, between the two production systems, can be related back to two factors - breed choice and season of year for lambing (breeding).
Most successful accelerated lambing systems rely on prolific ewe breeds or crosses as their base genetics. Prolific breeds are recognized for having the following traits:
These traits allow replacement ewe lambs from prolific breeds to cycle and breed at lighter weights, to have higher conception rates, and higher lambing rates compared to non-prolific breeds. As well, mortality rates are also higher in prolific breeds, since birth weight decreases with increased number of lambs per litter.
Pasture lambing flocks tend to rely on breeds and breed crosses that have the following traits:
Extended breeding season is not as important for pasture based flocks
since breeding time is chosen to target lambing to coincide with pasture
growth. Because fecundity is not as high, lamb mortality targets are lower
in pasture systems compared to accelerated lambing systems. Recognize
that these are average mortality targets, since weather during lambing
can contribute to mortality rates as happened in the spring of 2002. This
type of weather is the "one in 10 year" worst case scenario.
Mortality rates of lambs from first time lambers are higher than mortality rates of lambs from mature ewes. Generally, first time lambers take longer to lamb, are slower cleaning off their lambs, and more reluctant to allow lambs to nurse. This applies equally to all production systems.
Every management decision must include the economic impact - what is
the cost? What is the benefit? This pertains equally to management and
performance of the replacement ewe lamb flock. Feed costs account for
the highest portion of operating expenses, and are expected to remain
high this feeding season. A balanced approach to improvements in the feeding
program will ensure that unnecessary expenses are avoided.
Comparison of Good Production Performance with Average Performance
for two 60 ewe startup flocks (Alberta, 1994)
Total feed per ewe per year .80 Tonne
|
Average Performance
|
|
|---|---|
| Live lambs born | 160% |
| Lamb mortality | 18% |
| Lambs raised to market weight | 132% |
| Market weight of lambs | 105 pounds |
| Total feed per ewe per year | .80 Tonne |
| Net profit | ($3,551) |
| Net profit per ewe | ($59.19) |
| Net cash flow per year | ($1,995) |
|
Good Performance
|
|
|---|---|
| Live lambs born | 190% |
| Lamb mortality | 10% |
| Lambs raised to market weight | 171% |
| Market weight of lambs | 110 pounds |
| Total feed per ewe per year | .66 Tonne |
| Net profit | $466 |
| Net profit per ewe | $7.76 |
|
Net cash flow per year |
$1,951 |
Although not specific to replacement ewes, this table shows the impact of good production performance on net profit compared to average performance levels. These numbers are from a Cost of Production Study of Alberta operations in 1994.
Performance targets are difficult to achieve unless real measures are taken and evaluated. Producers are encouraged to:
Use these data to fine-tune your management so that next year's replacements will have every opportunity to perform at the desired levels.
The following table provides some performance targets and their ranges for replacement ewe lambs.
Reproduction Targets for Replacement ewe Lambs in Two Production Systems
|
Annual Pasture
|
Accelerated
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Target
|
Range
|
Target
|
Range
|
||
| Age @ Breeding (months) |
7
|
7-9
|
7
|
6-12
|
|
| Wt @ Breeding (% of mature ewe wt) |
65%
|
60-70
|
65%
|
55-80
|
|
| Length of Breeding Period (days) |
21
|
17-35
|
21
|
17-35
|
|
| Wt @ Weaning (pounds) |
60
|
55-70
|
50
|
35-60
|
|
| Age @ Weaning (months) |
3.5
|
2.75-4
|
2
|
1.5-2.5
|
|
| Average Daily Gain-Weaning to Breeding (pounds) |
0.4
|
0.25-0.5
|
0.35
|
0.2-0.6
|
|
| Conception Rate (In Season) % |
80
|
>65
|
80
|
>70
|
|
| Conception
Rate (Out of Season) % |
-
|
-
|
30
|
>20
|
|
| Lambing Percentage (Prolific) |
1.6
|
>1.2
|
1.6
|
>1.2
|
|
| Lambing Percentage (Non-prolific) |
1
|
>0.8
|
1
|
>0.8
|
|
| Mortalities |
Non-prolific
|
Prolific
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lambs
|
% Stillborn | 7 | 7-9 | 7 | 6-12 |
| % Birth to 10 Days | 65% | 60-70 | 65% | 55-80 | |
| % 10 Days to Weaning | 21 | 17-35 | 21 | 17-35 | |
| % Weaning
to Market |
|
||||
|
Annual Pasture
|
Accelerated
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mortality in Adult Ewes (%) |
2
|
1-5
|
4
|
2-5
|
|
| Confined (In Addition to Annual or Accelerated) |
2
|
-
|
2
|
--
|
|
| Outwinter (In Addition to Annual or Accelerated) |
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
|
Conception Rate = number of ewes lambing/number of ewes
exposed to ram
Lambing Percentage = number of lambs born/number of ewes
lambing
Lamb Crop = conception rate x lambing percentage
AgVentures - Ag. Business Profile: Commercial Sheep Production. 1999. Alberta Agriculture. Agdex 430/830-1.
Achieving Production Targets for Prime Lamb. 2000. Department of Agriculture, Western Australia.
Reducing the Seasonality of Prime Lamb Production. 1998.
E.J. Grennan, Teagasc Research Centre, Ireland.
| Author: | Anita O'Brien - Sheep and Goat Specialist/OMAFRA |
|---|---|
| Creation Date: | 05 December 2003 |
| Last Reviewed: | 5 February 2010 |