In This Section |
The "Hand" Measurement for Horses
Tracing a tradition backward is a dicey proposition. We know that today a "hand" is 4 inches, with one inch increments, and the measurement is from level ground to the highest non-variable skeletal structure on the horse, the withers.
History suggests that at one time, perhaps 5,000 years ago, it was as rudimentary as stacking a man's clenched fist one upon another, which tells us it was rather rough and inaccurate. At some point, horse owners, and especially traders, agreed that the "hand" will always represent 4 inches, and will always measure the height from level ground to the withers. But why a "hand"? In the ancient Mediterranean cultures, the hand unit developed along with other measures based upon references people of the time could relate to, such as body parts (e.g., foot). The problem was, whose foot, or whose hand? There were some inaccuracies. Ancient Egypt - 3,000 BC
The CubitIn the Egyptian system, measurement was based on the cubit (sometimes mentioned in reference to the construction of the pyramids or Noah's ark). The Egyptian cubit is generally recognized as having been the most widely accepted standard of linear measurement in the very ancient world. The cubit was based on the length of the arm from the elbow to the extended fingertips, an arbitrary distinction, which was then standardized by a royal master cubit of black granite. It was kept in a royal vault and all the cubit sticks in use in Egypt were measured at regular intervals.
The royal cubit (524 millimetres, or 20.62 inches) was subdivided in an extraordinarily complicated way. There were 28 subunits, known as digits, likely a finger's breadth, in the royal cubit. Five digits equalled a hand, four digits, a palm. This was not a planned system. It evolved, growing out of custom and popular usage, unlike planned systems of measurement like the Metric or the International System of Units (ISU) that we are more familiar with today. The standardized "hand" has become as good an increment to use in the determination of a horse's height at the withers as any other. But it is by no means the only means. Regardless of its origin, the hand has become a tradition of British measurement. In the rest of Europe however, height was and still is measured in metres and centimetres. In some places, like Europe and South Africa, there exists the dual situation of measurement in hands and centimetres. At some sales, for example, the height (at the withers) of a horse for sale is catalogued as 16.3 hh. 170/181 + 3. 16.3 hh. 170/181 + 3 - Explanation
One can argue which system is better, the hand is accurate to one inch whereas the metric system can be as accurate as the decimal places you include. But in measuring a horse, how much accuracy is required, especially with growing horses? If measurements within an inch are good enough, and there are 5,000 years of tradition behind the system, just how easy is it going to be to change it? Withers - The top of the shoulders, between the neck and the
back. The highest point of the withers is used in measuring the horse's
height. History of Linear Measurement10th Century (Saxon King Edgar & Henry I) 12th Century (Richard the Lionheart) 13th Century (Edward I): Measurements defined Note: A horse of 15.2 hands measures 15 times 4 inches, plus 2 inches = 62 inches. It is therefore important to keep in mind that you can have 15.3 hands but after the next full inch the height is taken as 16 hands not 15.4. References:http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=114986&tocid=13608#13608.toc | Top of Page | For more information:Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300 Local: (519) 826-4047 E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca |
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's
Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: