Body Condition Scoring of Horses


Factsheet - ISSN 1198-712X   -   Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario
Agdex#: 460/28
Publication Date: 12/98
Order#: 98-101
Last Reviewed: 12/98
History: Original Factsheet
Written by: Dr. B. Wright - Veterinary Scientist, Equine and Alternative Livestock/OMAFRA; Gerrit Rietveld and Penny Lawlis - Animal Care Inspectors/OMAFRA

PDF Version (215 KB)

 

Table of Contents

  1. Figure 1 - Diagram of Areas Emphasized in Condition Score
  2. Body Condition Scoring
  3. Figure 2 - Lumbar Vertebra-Anterior View Indicating Profile Lines for Each Body Condition Score
  4. Figure 3 - Body Condition Scoring
  5. Table 1 - Descriptions of Anatomical Differences Between Body Condition Scores
  6. Herd Evaluation With Body Condition Scoring
  7. Table 2 - Evaluation of Herd
  8. Figure 4 - Change in Body Condition for the Herd of Horses
  9. Summary
  10. References

 

Body Condition Scoring (BCS) is an objective system of evaluating a horse's level of body condition (amount of stored fat) and assessing a numeric score to facilitate comparisons between horses. Many owners fail to recognize significant variations in the weight of horses or variations due to age and breed types. This often results in overfeeding or underfeeding.

Figure 1. Diagram of Areas Emphasized in Condition Score (Adapted from Henneke et.al. 1981, Texas A&M)

Figure 1 is a diagram depicting  areas emphasized in Condition Score.

Body condition scoring involves the palpation and visual assessment of the degrees of fatness of various areas of the horse, such as: over the ribs, tailhead area, neck and withers, and behind the shoulders. (Figure 1.) Fat reserves in these areas depend on the balance between energy intake and energy loss, for various activities.

If there is a negative energy balance (energy loss greater than energy intake), then weight, and subsequent body condition, will be lost. This energy balance depends on such factors as: availability of food and water, weather (e.g., ambient temperature and wind chill), reproductive activity (e.g., pregnancy, lactation) and physical activity demands for growth and health status. A positive energy balance (energy expenditure less than energy intake) will result in a horse adding fat and muscle and improving body condition.

Body Condition Scoring

The body condition score system described here is mainly based on the system described by Carroll and Huntington (1988)(1). Palpation and visual inspection of the ribs, tailhead area, neck and withers, and behind the shoulders, facilitates the comparison of horses with differing amounts of stored body fat, independent of body size or breed of horse.

Figure 2 shows the profile lines for the various body condition scores. The profile of BCS 0 and 1 follow the anatomical skeleton and describe stages of emaciation and extremely thin respectively. A score of 3 has a smooth appearance to the skeletal structure and represents a horse in optimum body condition for maintenance and is neither gaining nor losing weight. Horses scoring 3+ to 4 have a rounded appearance to their skeletal structure. They are in above average flesh but this should not impair their reproductive ability, especially if they are being maintained in outdoor housing during the winter.

A long hair coat can be misleading. Some conformational differences make it difficult to apply certain criteria to a specific animal. For example, animals with prominent withers, or flat across the back and mares heavy in foal (weight of the foal pulls skin taut over the ribs) may cause body condition scores to be lower than they actually are. However, when properly applied, the scoring system is independent of size or conformation of the horse.

Figure 2. Lumbar Vertebra-Anterior View Indicating Profile Lines for Each Body Condition Score

Figure 2 is a diagram of the lumabar vertebra-anterior view indicating profile lines for each body condition score.
Figure 3. Body Condition Scoring (adapted from Carroll C.L. and Huntington P.J., Body Condition Scoring and Weight Estimation of Horses)

A chart showing the body conditions of horses from Score 0 (poor) to Score 5 (fat)

When evaluating animals, there will be an animal-to-animal variation; thus the use of the terms "easy-keeper" and "hard-keeper". Easy-keepers include any of the individuals of the draft breeds, ponies and quarter horses. They also include the dominant animals in a herd situation. Hard-keepers include many of the individuals of the following breeds: Arabian, thoroughbred and gaited horses. Hard-keepers will also include the shy individuals who are lower on the pecking order in a herd situation. Table 1 summarizes the various body condition scores, while Figure 3 depicts the changes in body appearance.

Table 1. Descriptions of Anatomical Differences Between Body Condition Scores


 Condition

 Neck

 Withers

Back & Loin 

Ribs

 Hind Quarters

 0 Very thin

bone structure easily felt- no muscle shelf where neck meets shoulder

bone structure easily felt

3 points of vertebrae easily felt (see Figure 2)

each rib can be easily felt

tailhead and hip bones projecting

 1 Thin

can feel bone structure- slight shelf where neck meets shoulder

can feel bone structure

spinous process can be easily felt
- transverse processes have slight fat covering

slight fat covering, but can still be felt

can feel hip bones

 2 Fair

fat covering over bone structure

fat deposits over withers - dependent on conformation

fat over spinous processes

can't see ribs, but ribs can still be felt

hip bones covered with fat

 3 Good

neck flows smoothly into shoulder

neck rounds out withers

back is level

layer of fat over ribs

can't feel hip bones

 4 Fat

fat deposited along neck

fat padded around withers

positive crease along back

 fat spongy over and between ribs

can't feel hip bones

 5 Very fat

bulging fat

bulging fat

deep positive crease

pockets of fat

pockets of fat

As a guide to learning the scoring system and interpreting the results, examples of "typical" condition scores are listed below. There will be a range of condition within each score so it is sometimes convenient to assign +'s and -'s or half point scores as in 2.5 or 3.5.

 Score 0
 Emaciated
  • with sunken rump and deep cavity under tail, skin tight over ribs; e.g., severely debilitated older horses with abnormal teeth occlusion, starvation.
 Score 1.0
 Poor
  • very thin with prominent pelvis and croup, ribs visible
 Score 2.0
 Moderate
  • thin with flat rump, croup well defined, some fat; e.g., mare that has been severely dragged down by milking while on poor pasture.
 Score 2.5
 
  • e.g., racing condition or endurance horse.
 Score 3.0
 Good
  • ribs and pelvis covered with fat and rounded; e.g., a halter horse in prime show condition.
 Score 3.5
 
  • e.g., mature mare in mid-gestation.
 Score 4.0
 Fat
  • fat covering ribs and pelvis requiring firm pressure to feel; e.g., an easy-keeping, mature horse on pasture with little or no work.
 Score 5.0
 Very Fat
  • severe over condition with ribs and pelvis that cannot be felt, deep gutter in back; e.g., a fat pony prone to founder (laminitis).

Herd Evaluation With Body Condition Scoring

The BCS system is often used when evaluating individual animals. However, when dealing with a group of horses, changes in the body condition from month to month as a result of changes in total feed being fed, or feed quality and utilization, can be evaluated. Follow the instructions and evaluate a group or herd of horses throughout a winter feeding period or throughout the year.

1. Body condition score each horse in the herd. (The example uses a herd of 22 horses.) Record the results in a table like Table 2.

2. Create a blank chart similar to Figure 4, where Number of Horses is on the vertical-axis and BCS is recorded on the horizontal-axis. Place an "X" on the graph at the intersection of the number of horses in each group and the BCS.

3. Join the markings, creating a line graph. Use a different colour for each month.

4. Do this consecutively on a monthly basis. Observe any changes to the shape of the graph or movement of the curve either left or right.

Table 2. Evaluation of Herd

Body Condition
Score

 Number of Horses in Each Score
 Sept.  Dec.  Mar.
 0
 2
 0
 0
 1
 3
 0
 0
 2, 2 ½
 10
 8
 2
 3, 3 ½
 5
 12
 13
 4
 2
 2
 5
 5
 0
0
 2


Figure 4 shows the change in body condition for the herd of horses. Movement of the curve to the right shows that the herd is in a positive energy balance while movement to the left shows a negative energy balance.

The individuals who need extra care and energy are those whose body condition scores are 2 or less. These individuals usually include: older horses with poor teeth; young and shy horses that are competing for food; aged mares in foal; or mares that have been dragged down by lactation. Horses with a body condition score of 3.5 and above are usually the "easy-keepers", the dominant individuals, and ponies.

Nutrition was improved for the herd, especially those with body scores of less than 2. By the end of December, their body scores had improved and, by March, they were all greatly improved.

Figure 4. Changes in Body Condition for the Herd of Horses
A chart showing the changes in body condition in a herd o horses from March from March to December.

Summary

A consistent method of body condition scoring is a useful management tool. It will improve communication between stable employees, owners and veterinarians by providing a descriptive method, which is affected by changes in nutrition, physiological level of activity, or environmental conditions. It promotes a better awareness of feed utilization and allows for changes to feeding regimes based on individual and/or herd responses.

References

  1. Carroll C.L., and Huntington P. J., Body Condition Scoring and Weight Estimation of Horses, Equine Veterinary Journal (1988) 20 (1), 41 - 45.
  2. Henneke D. R., Potter G.D., Kreider J. L. and Yeates B. F., Relationship Between Condition Score, Physical Measurements and Body Fat Percentage in Mares, Equine Veterinary Journal (1983) 15 (4), 371 - 372.

| Top of Page |


For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca