In This Section |
Chronic Wasting Disease Update
Table of Contents
Over the past 5 years, chronic wasting disease (CWD) has emerged as the most important disease to affect both wild and farmed cervid populations in North America. Since 2000, most jurisdictions in North America have developed surveillance programs to determine the presence or absence of CWD in both their farmed and wild cervid populations. In North America, more than 300,000 cervids have been tested for CWD in the past 5 years. Concerns over CWD transmission will affect the movement of live cervids and their products until better technology provides a live test with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. IntroductionCWD of elk and deer is an infectious disease causing animals to have increased salivation, polydypsia (increased drinking), polyuria (increased urination), excessive drooling, ataxia (incoordination) and progressive neurological signs. The incubation period can be up to 36 months, post exposure. CWD belongs to a group of diseases called transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). The emergence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) has raised the profile of CWD and other diseases in the TSE group. Hueston and Bryant have summarized the current knowledge on the TSE diseases (1). Current research indicates that the agent associated with CWD is an abnormal infectious protein or prion. A prion is a normal cellular protein involved in synaptic (nerve junction) function at the neuron and coded by a single gene. The abnormal prion or proteinaceous infectious particle is protease resistant and abbreviated to PrPres. The specific prion associated with CWD is abbreviated to PrPCWD. PrPres corrupt normal cellular prions and cause them to become protease resistant. Protease-resistant prions accumulate and cause vacuolation of neurons and loss of function. A recent theory is that a slow virus is the infectious agent and the abnormal prion is a manifestation of the infection(2). There is no evidence that CWD can be transmitted naturally to other livestock or humans(3). Regional DistributionUnited StatesCWD has been present in free-roaming elk, mule deer, white-tailed deer and black-tailed deer in an endemic area that includes northern Colorado, southern Wyoming and southwestern Nebraska since the late 1970s. The prevalence rate of CWD in the endemic areas of north-central Colorado and southeastern Wyoming can be as high as 17% in local populations of mule and white-tailed deer and about 1% in elk. Recently, a wild moose from the same area was identified as being infected with CWD. Many states and provinces have increased their surveillance in both farmed and wild cervids. Wisconsin tested 69,000 samples from 2002 to 2005(4). The common saying, "The more you test, the more you find," has unfortunately come true. Since 2001, the geographic distribution of CWD has expanded on farms and in the wild to include two Canadian provinces - Alberta and Saskatchewan - and at least 14 states - Colorado, Wyoming, Wisconsin, Kansas, New Mexico, New York, West Virginia, Minnesota, Illinois, Montana, Utah, South Dakota, Nebraska and Oklahoma. The increased geographic distribution may be due to heightened awareness and increased testing or to a true expansion of the range of the disease. CanadaThe first reported case of CWD in Canada was in a group of mule deer imported in 1974 via a shipment from the Denver Zoo to the Toronto Metropolitan Zoo. The last animal with CWD of the group died in 1981(5). In 1996, CWD was diagnosed on 40 cervid farms in Saskatchewan. The source of this outbreak was traced to elk imported from South Dakota. This outbreak, coupled with a heightened awareness of the TSEs in the late 1990s, brought CWD to the forefront. In addition to the 40 Saskatchewan herds, two farms in Alberta in 2002 were also diagnosed with CWD. Approximately 9,000 farmed cervids were destroyed, with 233 being infected, 31 of them considered clinical(6).
Figure 1. Distribution of Chronic Wasting
Disease in North America current to June 2007. TransmissionCervid SpeciesEpidemiology supports CWD as primarily being an infectious disease. Maternal transmission appears to be relatively rare (3). During the eradication of the farmed herds in Saskatchewan, the infection rate in herds using stock tanks with large volumes of water (60 gal or more) was greater than in herds using small-volume water bowls(9). This would be consistent with observations that cervids exhibiting clinical signs of CWD drool while drinking and spend more time around water sources than normal. These observations support the hypothesis that saliva and feces are important in the transmission of the agent(1, 3). The PrPCWD accumulates in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (e.g., tonsils, mesenteric lymph nodes). Saliva and feces are important in the shedding of the agent. TSE infectivity can persist, when buried, for at least three years(10).
Practices that increase the concentration of cervids and, therefore, the
environmental contamination (e.g., holding cervids in captivity or through
artificial baiting of wild cervids) may be important in increasing the
transmission of the agent. Casual fence-line contact is less likely to
increase the possibility of transmission. Both direct (e.g., prolonged
contact across the fence) and indirect transmission (e.g., from contaminated
pastures) are possible. Shedding of the virus probably precedes clinical
signs in both elk and deer(3). Wild Cervids
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year | Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 Total submissions |
51
|
15
|
18
|
10
|
6
|
2
|
|
| 1999 Total submissions |
47
|
16
|
15
|
9
|
3
|
4
|
|
| 2000 Total submission |
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Histology on brain |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IHC |
6
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
| 2001 Total submissions |
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IHC |
25
|
19
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
| Year 2002 |
Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild (MNR) - IHC |
155
|
4
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
| Farmed - IHC |
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total - IHC |
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year 2003 |
Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild (MNR) - IHC |
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Farmed - IHC |
241
|
167
|
16
|
47 |
1
|
10 |
|
| Total - IHC |
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year 2004 |
Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild (MNR) Bio-Rad | 420 | ||||||
| Farmed - IHC | 234 | 115 | 23 | 52 | 1 | 43 | |
| Total IHC & Bio-Rad | 654 |
| Year 2005 |
Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild (MNR) Bio-Rad | 1436 | 1436 | |||||
| Farmed Bio-Rad | 109 | 41 | 16 | 43 | 1 | 9 | |
| Farmed - IHC | 1 | ||||||
| Total IHC & Bio-Rad | 1544 |
| Year 2006 |
Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild (MNR) Bio-Rad | 1451 | 1451 | |||||
| Farmed Bio-Rad | 316 | 202 | 26 | 88 | |||
| Total | 1767 |
| Year 2007 to July 26/07 |
Submissions | Elk | Reds and Elk/Red Hybrids |
White- tailed Deer |
Fallow Deer |
Other Reindeer, Moose |
Unspecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild (MNR) Bio-Rad | Not reported | ||||||
| Farmed Bio-Rad | 203 | 104 | 28 | 50 | 20 | 1 | |
| Total | 203 |
IHC = The number of immunohistochemistries performed. Full necropsies
may have been performed in addition to the IHC.
Wild = Data from wild deer, including hunter-killed white-tailed deer
(WTD), elk from the elk restoration project and WTD from park culls.
MNR = Ministry of Natural Resources.

Figure 2. The brain stem is cut 1 cm above and below the obex (the "V" on the dorsal surface of the brain stem).
If Bio-Rad is being used, place the obex in a whirl-pack and keep it refrigerated or freeze it prior to submission to the laboratory. If immunohistochemistry is being used, place the obex in 10% buffered formalin. Some jurisdictions may require samples to be split, with half placed in buffered formalin and half fresh or frozen.
The Animal Health Laboratory (AHL), at the University of Guelph, is now using Bio-Rad to test for CWD and is no longer using IHC. All samples from Ontario to be tested using Bio-Rad must be shipped fresh or fresh/frozen. Ontario samples can be shipped to the AHL by Purolator at no cost by using "Purolator - University of Guelph incoming account #096691" on the waybill. Samples shipped in formalin can no longer be tested by AHL.
When developing surveillance programs of slaughter animals, it is necessary to hold all carcasses until the samples have been declared free of CWD. The turn-around time between the collection, testing and release of carcasses can be a problem when cooler capacity in an abattoir is limited. With the new rapid tests having 24-36-hour turn-around times, this is less of a problem but requires the coordination of meat inspection and laboratory services.
With the detection of CWD in at least 14 states and two provinces, its long incubation period, the public's heightened awareness and fear of the TSE diseases, it is critical that deer farmers and governments continue with surveillance to halt the spread of CWD.
| Top of Page |
For more information:
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's
Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: