Water Sanitation Options: Considerations

To view PDF version, click here.

 

Availability of Test Strips

Monitoring Device: Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) Meters

Monitoring Device: Other

Requires Micro Verification

pH Range of Water During Treatment

Concentration Recommended

Effectiveness in the Presence of Organic Matter

Work Safety (Risk)

Environmental Impact

Treatment Speed of Large Volumes of Water

Cost*

Unique Attributes

Chlorine (Food Grade)

Yes
Works well
Yes
Yes
6.5 - 7.5
50 - 300 ppm
Limited
Medium:Irritant to skin, eyes and throat
Medium
Fast
1 X
Odour. Continues to be some disposal concerns.

Chlorine Dioxide

Yes
Works well
Yes
Yes
6 - 10
5 ppm
Effective
High: Irritant to skin, eyes and throat
Medium/High
Fast
15 X
Most demanding form of Chlorine - must produce onsite. Odour.

Hydrogen Peroxide

Yes
Challenging
Yes
Yes
6 - 8
3%
Effective
Medium:Irritant to skin, eyes and throat
Low
Medium
90 X
Need to acidify to pH 6.

Peroxyacetic Acid

Yes
Challenging
Yes
Yes
< 4
50 - 80 ppm
Effective
High: Severe irritant to skin, eyes and throat. Requires ventilated area
Medium
Medium/Fast
5 X
Not ideal for sensitive produce. pH may need to be increased prior to disposal. Very strong odour.

UV

No
Not suitable
Yes**
Yes
NA
NA
Not Effictive (must filter)
Low
Low
Slow
Varies based on facility
Ensure bulb is functional and clear of mineral deposits. Challenges with hard water.

Ozone

No
Challenging
Yes
Yes
6 - 8
3 ppm
Limited
(must filter)
Medium: Must have off-destruct device and detector(s)
Low
Slow
Varies based on facility
Fast oxidizer, however, delivery system reduces speed of large water volume sanitation.

 

* All cost is relative to Chlorine (Food Grade)

** This is a detector to ame sure the bulb is working

 


For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca


Author: OMAFRA Staff
Creation Date: 25 March 2010
Last Reviewed: 25 March 2010