In This Section |
No-Till:
Making It Work
|
| Author: | OMAFRA Staff |
|---|---|
| Creation Date: | 28 May 2002 |
| Last Reviewed: | 06 May 2004 |
In no-till, nutrient requirements don't change. But in many cases, the type and timing of application practices do. The differences in the no-till seedbed conditions pose challenges for nutrient retention, fertilizer materials, application methods and timing of operations. There are fewer conventional application methods available - modifications to planting and nutrient application equipment can overcome these.
Before
beginning a no-till system, soils should be in an acceptable pH range
for crops grown.
Ideally, nutrient levels (phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, etc.) will be at a medium-high range.
Surface-applied nutrients waste money and increase risk to the environment.
Understanding the fertilizer materials and their activity in no-till conditions is a first step to making nutrient management work in no-till:
Nutrient stratification occurs under long-term no-till conditions. This means that a buildup of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) occurs on or near the soil surface over time when the soil is managed in a no-till system. This stratification is caused by normal crop demands on the nutrients deeper in the soil profile, and the absence of incorporation.
The
nutrient-rich layer with depleted zones below show up after three
to five years of no-till management. When fertilizer is applied properly,
however, nutrient stratification should not affect yields. To counter
stratification, at least some of the phosphorus and potassium requirement
should be applied in a band with or near the seed row. Because these
two nutrients move very little in soil, plants use phosphorus and
potassium applied in a band almost twice as efficiently as they use
broadcast fertilizers.
No-till conditions help the growth of soil mycorrhizae. Soil mycorrhizae assist plant roots in obtaining nutrients (phosphorus) from the soil by increasing the area exploited by the roots.
Check the tables in OMAFRA Publication 296 for safe rates of nitrogen and potassium in starters.
| Source | Method | Time | Yield bu/ac @ 15.5% moisture |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Nitrogen |
76.3
|
||
| Urea | Broadcast | Preplant |
130.0
|
| Urea Ammonium Nitrate | Broadcast | Preplant |
136.0
|
| Urea Ammonium Nitrate | Coulter injected | Preplant |
145.2
|
| Anhydrous Ammonia | Knifed in | Preplant |
150.6
|
| Urea Ammonium Nitrate | Spoke wheel injected | Sidedress |
147.6
|
| Urea Ammonium Nitrate | Coulter injected | Sidedress |
146.3
|
| Anhydrous Ammonia | Knifed in | Sidedress |
152.3
|
The results from eight site-years showed a significant difference among nitrogen source, method and time of application treatments. The anhydrous ammonia and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) soil-injected treatments gave considerably higher yields than urea ammonium nitrate and urea surface broadcast.

We don't need to apply fertilizer to beans. But for corn we put dry
starter behind one coulter and 40 lbs. of liquid 28% nitrogen behind
the tillage coulter.
Charlie Bolton, Middlesex County

We've switched from anhydrous to liquid 28&. It's easier to apply
as sidedress.
Murray Lobb, Huron County

When we decided to get into no-till (1986), we tested the soil for
phosphorus, potassium and pH levels. We broadcast where there were
any problems. Now we test every three years and maintain the levels.
Elwin Vince, Kent County
Lime
won't move from where you put it, so surface applications won't help
deep problems. Maintenance applications will work, but soil test is
best.
Keith Reid, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
| Introduction
| Soil Management
| Residue Management
| Planting Equipment
| Weed Control
|
| Insect Management
| Disease Management
| Nutrient Management
| Crop Rotation
| Cover Crops
|
| Varietal Selection
| Case
Studies | Table of Contents |
| Top of Page |
For more information:
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's
Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: