|
| Infosheet
#8 On-Farm Storage of Livestock Manure and Other Prescribed Materials Table of Contents IntroductionThis
infosheet provides background to Worksheet #8 of the Environmental Farm Plan Workbook.
It outlines options you could adopt to address problem areas in your operation.
In most cases you'll need more information before implementation. Please refer
to the resource materials listed in the infosheet, and consult OMAFRA Environmental
Farm Plan (EFP) Technical Advisors. All options are classed as Actions,
Compensating Factors or Monitoring. Actions address the areas of concern identified,
and will change the rating to (3) or Best (4). Compensating Factors are alternatives
that will adequately address the concerns, but will not change the rating in the
EFP worksheets. Monitoring is an alternative only in special circumstances and
is explained in the infosheet when and how it can be used. At the request
of the Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition, consisting of Ontario Federation
of Agriculture, Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario, AGCare, and the Ontario
Farm Animal Council, the following people contributed to the development of Infosheet
#8: Don Hilborn, OMAFRA (Chair) Jack Rodenburg, OMAFRA Murray Blackie,
MOEE Peter Doris, OFAC Tracy Ryan, Grand River Conservation Authority The
following people contributed to the revision (2004) of Infosheet #8: Don
Hilborn, OMAFRA (Co-Chair) Kevin McKague, OMAFRA (Co-Chair) Steve Miller
(Stonecrest Engineering) Scott Abernethy, MOE Anne Loeffler, Grand River
Conservation Authority Margaret May, Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association Technical
Editing Committee: H. J. Smith, OMAFRA Bob Stone, OMAFRA Jim Myslik,
OMAFRA OMAFRA = Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
MOE = Ontario Ministry of the Environment Location
of StorageIssue: 8-1 Distance from manure/prescribed
material storage to nearest surface water The shorter the separation distance
the greater the risk of contaminating surface water supplies. Steeply sloping
topography and heavy soil will further increase the chance for surface runoff
to reach surface water. (See Section 63.(3) of O. Reg 267/ 03, as amended) What
can you do?Option #1 - Action Build storage an adequate distance
from surface water: - locate downslope from surface water where possible
-
new storage location should change the final EFP distance rating to a (3) or better.
Option
#2 - Action Move surface water away from storage: - a small
watercourse could be redirected and moved farther away from the storage or moved
underground through a non-perforated pipe system - make sure necessary approvals
from relevant agencies (e.g. MOE, MNR, DFO, Municipality, and local CA) are received
before making this change. Note, that many have found this option to be cost prohibitive
Approvals may also be difficult to obtain
- new surface water location
should change final EFP distance rating to a (3) or better.
Option
#3 - Action Increase the flow path distance between surface water and
materials storage: - earthen diversions can be built that will redirect
manure spillage to run alongside the watercourse or cause it to meander in an
upslope area for a distance instead of running directly to the surface water.
This increases the distance runoff has to travel before entering surface water.
It allows for more time to block any spillage from entering surface water. Ensure
any berming will not cause or increase erosion on either your property or neighbouring
lands. Professional assistance to site and design berms is recommended when such
work is being considered, particularly along larger watercourses. A permit from
the local Conservation Authority will be necessary if work is done in floodplain
areas
- length of flow path must be the minimum distance specified in
the (3) category.
Option #4 - Monitoring For storages that
have, or will have within two years, complete storage of manure/prescribed materials
and/or runoff with adequate capacity and are in good working condition, monitor
storage regularly, visually checking for leaks, cracks, holes, seepage or overtopping
of storage: - consider constructing secondary containment to catch
possible spills.
For More Information: - Nutrient
Management Act, O. Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and
NSTS standards.
- NMAN/MSTOR - Ontario's nutrient management planning and
manure storage sizing software
Local Conservation Authority (CA) - for floodplain
related questions. Issue: 8-2 Distance
from manure/prescribed material storage to well The greater the separation
distance, the less chance there is of spilled prescribed materials collecting
in the vicinity of the well head and causing direct contamination. As well, if
the storage leaks to ground water, contamination reaching the well is less likely
if the well is located further away from the storage. The soil type, depth to
water table and bedrock will also influence the contamination potential.
(See Section 63.(1) of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended) What can you do?Option
#1 - Action Rebuild storage an adequate distance away from well:
- when new storage is constructed, it should be sized to match the livestock
housing capacity of the barn or facility it services
- locate new storage
downslope of well if possible
- new storage location should change the
final EFP distance rating to a (3) or better
- where the minimum legal
separation distance cannot be attained due to site restrictions, seek guidance
from MOE
- test well water for indicator bacteria at least three times
a year, and once a year for other parameters (such as nitrate) until the new storage
is built.
Option #2 - Action Relocate water well away from
storage: - make sure old well is properly plugged (abandoned according
to Ontario Regulation 903)
- new water well location should change the
final EFP distance rating to a (3) or better
- where minimum separation
distances cannot be attained due to site restrictions, seek guidance from MOE
-
test well water for indicator bacteria at least three times a year, and once a
year for other parameters (such as nitrate) until the new water well is installed.
Option
#3 - Monitoring Well Water (Private Well) For concrete or steel storages
that have, or will have within two years, adequate capacity and are in good working
condition (no leaks or cracks), test the well water for indicator bacteria at
least three times a year and once a year for other parameters (such as nitrate):
- monitoring of well water is NOT A SOLUTION - in case a test reveals
contamination of the well water, have a plan of action in place to immediately
identify and address the source of contamination
- for earthen storages,
monitoring well water is an alternative only when the storage is to be upgraded
with an hydraulically secure man-made or soil-based liner. It is recommended these
liners meet or exceed the minimum requirements specified in the Nutrient Management
Act for the design and siting of nutrient storage facilities
- if you
have an EFP rating of (1), contact MOE for further guidance.
For
More Information: - Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03,
as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards
- NMAN/MSTOR - Ontario's
nutrient management planning and manure storage sizing software.
- Best
Management Practices Book: Information Kit - Keeping Your Well Water Safe to
Drink, Order No. BMP 12K (Available from MOE or OMAFRA)
Issue:
8-3 Distance from manure/prescribed material storage to floodplain(See
Section 63.(4) of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended) What
can you do?Option #1 - Action Build storage outside of known
or suspected floodplain: - if it is suspected that a site could be
in a floodplain contact your local municipality or the local Conservation Authority
to determine if floodplain mapping is available. In many cases floodplain mapping
in rural areas is not available. Priority areas for floodplain mapping are those
where there is a high risk to human life or economic loss. If flooding of the
chosen building site is thought to be a good possibility, municipal officials
may request the Conservation Authority investigate to assess risk.
Option
#2 - Action Floodproofing measures approved by local Conservation Authority:
- floodproofing a storage could involve ensuring the storage top elevation
exceeds the flood lines and that the structure is designed to withstand a potential
flood situation. Ensure both the engineer and contractor retained to design and
construct/modify the storage are aware of the flood-proofing measures required
by the local Conservation Authority.
Option #3 - Action Have
storage location approved by the local Conservation Authority: - in
some cases, Conservation Authorities may conclude that other environmental benefits
arising from building the storage at a site are greater than the flooding risk.
Their staff could assist in determining this.
For More Information:
- Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended,
and associated protocols and NSTS standards.
- Local Conservation Authority
(CA) - for floodplain related questions.
Issue:
8-4 Distance from manure/prescribed material storage to subsurface perforated
or clay drainage tile Surface water is at less risk if there are no subsurface
perforated tile drainage systems in close proximity to the storage (See Section
63.(5) of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended). What can you do?Option
#1 - Action Remove all perforated drainage tile located beneath and within
75 ft. of the storage. - refer to tile drain maps or records
to locate all known subsurface tiles. May require some trenching in the vicinity
(within 75 ft.) of the storage to find all suspected subsurface drains.
Option
#2 - Action Replace all perforated drainage tile located beneath and near
the storage with non-perforated pipe and all subsurface joints properly sealed.
- may conduct clean water around a storage (e.g. eavestrough water, upslope
diversion water).
Option #3 - Action Collect and store all
tile water: - this is an option when perforated drainage tile are
located beneath and near the storage.
Option #4 - ActionCollect
and treat all tile water: - this is an option when perforated drainage
tile are located beneath and near the storage.
For More Information:
- Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended,
and associated protocols.
- OMAFRA Agricultural Engineer or Nutrient Management
Specialist.
- Engineer and contractor you have retained to design and construct
the storage.
Storage
StructuresLiquid and Semi-solid Manure/Prescribed
Materials Issue: 8-5 Concrete or steel tanks Concrete
or steel storage tanks must be structurally sound. A major failure of a tank is
very serious, potentially causing extensive environmental damages and presenting
risk to human or animal safety. A minor failure (e.g. a leak) could cause continuous
ground or surface water contamination. Failures causing off-farm environmental
contamination could be addressed by the Drainage Act, Environmental Protection
Act, Water Resources Act, or the Fisheries Act. Through the Ontario Building
Code Act, municipalities and townships will require building permits that have
acceptable design plans. For farms that are provincially-regulated through
the Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and
associated protocols and NSTS standards identifies minimum standards that concrete
or steel storages must meet. (See Part VIII of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and
associated protocols and NSTS - 04) What can you do?Option #1
- Action Evaluate the existing storage using OMAFRA's Checklist for Evaluating
Existing Liquid Nutrient and Runoff Storage Structures: - obtain a
copy of the checklist (use one for each concrete or steel storage to be evaluated)
-
if assessment reveals a concern, hire a qualified third party to make an independent
assessment and if necessary do the repairs. Document the repairs that were made.
Option
#2 - Action Replace storage tank: - when new storage is constructed,
it should be sized to match the livestock housing capacity of the barn or facility
it services
- it must be properly designed and meet all building code requirements
and,
- it is recommended that all storages built today in Ontario meet
or exceed the NSTS standards associated with the Nutrient Management Act
-
unused storages must be properly decommissioned.
Option #3 - Action
Reinforce or rebuild components of the tank to eliminate known leakage
and failure concerns: - repairs must be properly designed, meeting
all building code requirements
- it is recommended that all storages repaired
today in Ontario meet or exceed the NSTS standards associated with the Nutrient
Management Act.
For More Information: - Nutrient
Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols
and NSTS standards
- OMAFRA Agricultural Engineer or Nutrient Management
Specialist
- The engineer and contractor you have retained to design and
construct the storage.
- Constructing Hydraulically Secure Liquid Nutrient
Storage Facilities - OMAFRA Factsheet, Order No. 04-067
- Constructing
a Concrete or Steel, Liquid Nutrient or Runoff Collection Storage Facility
- OMAFRA Factsheet, Order No. 06-001
Issue:
8-6 Earthen storage Earthen storages must be properly designed, built
and maintained to avoid failure. A major failure of an earthen storage can be
very serious, causing environmental damage and hazards for humans and animals.
A minor failure could cause continuous ground or surface water contamination.
(See Part VIII of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS) Failures
of earthen storages causing off-farm environmental contamination could be addressed
by the Drainage Act, Environmental Protection Act, Water Resources Act, or the
Fisheries Act. Earthen storages are not considered "structures"
under the Ontario Building Code Act. However, Ontario Regulation
267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards identify the minimum
standards for earthen storages built today in Ontario. What can you do?Option
#1 - Action Evaluate the existing storage using OMAFRA's Checklist for
Evaluating Existing Liquid Nutrient and Runoff Storage Structures: -
obtain a copy of the checklist (use one for each earthen storage to be evaluated)
-
if assessment reveals a concern, hire a qualified third party to make an independent
assessment and if necessary do the repairs. Document the repairs that were made.
Option
#2 - Action Replace earthen storage with a new earthen, concrete, or steel
storage: - when new storage is constructed, it should be sized to
match the livestock housing capacity of the barn or facility it services
-
it is recommended that all storages built today in Ontario meet or exceed the
NSTS standards associated with the Nutrient Management Act
- existing
unused earthen storage must be properly decommissioned.
Option #3
- Action Reinforce or rebuild components of the storage to eliminate known
leakage and failure concerns (e.g. install an hydraulically secure man-made or
soil-based liner): - it is recommended that all earthen storages repaired
today in Ontario meet or exceed the NSTS standards associated with the Nutrient
Management Act.
For More Information: - Nutrient
Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols
and NSTS standards
- OMAFRA Agricultural Engineer or Nutrient Management
Specialist
- The engineer and contractor you have retained to design and
construct the storage.
- Constructing an Earthen Liquid Nutrient or Run-off
Storage Facility - OMAFRA Factsheet, Order No. 06-005
Solid
Manure/Solid Prescribed Materials Issue: 8-7 Control
of runoff from solid manure/solid prescribed material storage on a paved base
(e.g. concrete) Runoff from solid storages should be contained and properly
handled or eliminated. If runoff is not controlled, the solid manure/prescribed
material storage may have a serious impact on surface and ground water quality. Runoff
causing off-farm environmental contamination could be addressed by the Drainage
Act, Environmental Protection Act, Water Resources Act, or the Fisheries Act. Through
the Ontario Building Code Act, municipalities and townships will require building
permits that have acceptable design plans. (See Part VIII ofO. Reg. 267/03,
as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS-05) Ontario Regulation 267/03,
as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards identify the minimum standards
that lined solid storages built today in Ontario should meet. What can
I do?Option #1 - Action Install a roof over solid manure/solid
prescribed material storage to eliminate direct precipitation: - ensure
clean water does not enter solid manure storage (see 8-12 for more info)
-
add more bedding to manure to soak up all liquids and increase manure dry matter
content
- reduce the amount of water entering the manure in the barn
-
typically not as useful an option if facility also produces washwaters (e.g. milking
centre) that needs containment.
Option #2 - Action Install
a system to properly contain all runoff from pad: - install a properly
sized and designed runoff storage
- clean, upslope water should be diverted
away from pad and storage
- adjust size to accommodate any washwater to
be added to storage (e.g. milking centre).
Option #3 - Action Tarp
storage to eliminate entry of direct rainfall: - divert upslope water
away from storage location
- securely tie down the cover
- a more
feasible option for operations whose barns are cleaned out on an infrequent basis
(e.g., broiler barns, manure pack transferred to outside storage, etc.).
Option
#4 - Action Construct a vegetative filter strip to manage runoff:
- will require an engineered design to account for peak flows
- will
require approval from MOE for system operation and maintenance.
Option
#5 - Action Establish a physical barrier consisting of a flow path to
manage runoff from solid storage: - earthen diversions can be built
that will redirect manure spillage to run alongside the watercourse or cause it
to meander in an upslope area for a distance instead of running directly to surface
water. This increases the distance runoff has to travel before reaching surface
water. Ensure any berming will not cause or increase erosion on either your property
or neighbouring lands. Professional assistance to site and design berms is recommended
when such work is being considered, particularly along larger watercourses. A
permit from the local Conservation Authority will be necessary if work is done
in floodplain areas
- length of flow path must be at least 300 m and dry
matter (DM) content of stored manure must be greater than 30%
- upslope
water must be diverted.
For More Information: - Nutrient
Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols
and NSTS standards
- Constructing a Solid Nutrient Storage Facility
- OMAFRA Factsheet, Order No. 06-003
- Building a Permanent Storage for
Solid Manure or Prescribed Materials over 18% Dry Matter - OMAFRA Factsheet,
Order No. 05-039
Issue: 8-8
Control of runoff from solid manure/solid prescribed material storage stacked
on a soil base As with all other types of manure storages, runoff from
solid storages with an earthen base should be contained and properly handled or
eliminated. A manure storage with a soil base can have the added risk of contaminated
water percolating into the ground beneath the pile and reaching groundwater or
tile drainage systems. If runoff is not controlled, the solid manure storage may
have a serious impact on surface and ground water quality. Failures causing off-farm
environmental contamination could be addressed by the Drainage Act, Environmental
Protection Act, Water Resources Act, and/or the Fisheries Act. (See Part VIII
of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS-05) What
can you do?Option #1- Action Cover or tarp storage and verify
the suitability of the existing earthen base and if necessary upgrade or replace:
- field investigation of soils beneath the manure storage can be completed
to assess soil clay content and thickness. A layer of soil at least 1m thick that
has 15% or greater clay content in combination with a storage cover is typically
considered adequate protection if the site cannot meet these criteria, a new site
for an earthen-based manure storage should be chosen. Alternatively, a soil base
meeting or exceeding these minimum criteria could be established at the site.
A paved surface is also an option (see 8-7)
- an engineer or geoscientist
could assist with the design of the storage's soil base. For farm operations phased
in under the Nutrient Management Act building a new storage having a soil
base, a third party (geoscientist or engineer) needs to assess the soil material
forming the storage base
- divert upslope water away from storage location
-
prevents clean rain water or snowmelt from percolating through or running off
the pile reducing the amount of leachate that needs to be collected or managed
-
securely tie down the tarp covers
- this option is more feasible for operations
whose barns are cleaned out on an infrequent basis. (eg. broiler barns, manure
pack, etc.).
For More Information: - Nutrient Management
Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS
standards.
Issue: 8-9 Stacked
in the field on soil base (temporary field storage) Runoff from stored
manure can cause significant environmental damage to surface and ground water.
Off-farm environmental contamination caused by runoff from temporary solid storages
could be addressed by the Drainage Act, Environmental Protection Act, Water Resources
Act, and/or the Fisheries Act. There is no "Best" category because
field storage will not fully contain runoff. In general, it is not a best practice
to stack solid prescribed materials on the ground for long-term storage. Ontario's
Nutrient Management Act Regulations, however, leave the option for temporary
field storage if the site chosen and material stored combine to result in a low-risk
situation. The OMAFRA Factsheet entitled "Temporary Storage of Solid Manure
or Prescribed Materials" outlines temporary field storage and siting
criteria.(See Sections 83 to 86 of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and NSTS -08) What
can you do?Option #1 - Action Stack in field for period of 60
days or less on a site that meets all temporary field storage siting and management
criteria: - temporary storage locations must meet all of the minimum
siting criteria outlined in Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, to achieve
a (3) rating. These siting criteria include the following: not established on
highly permeable soils (e.g. hydrologic soil group AA; minimum depth to bedrock
under site and within 10 ft. of the side of the site, must be 1 ft.); 165 feet
or more to nearest surface water or tile inlet; 150 ft. or more to nearest drilled
well; 300 ft. or more to nearest bored/dug well; 330ft. or more to nearest municipal
well. Minimum depth to water table under the site and within 10 ft. of the side
of the site is 3 ft. or more; 410 ft. or more to nearest single residence; 820
ft. or more to nearest residential area. Upslope surface water diverted. Land
slope at sites never greater than 3%
- manure to be stored must be greater
than 30% dry matter content. The main animal types whose manure can typically
meet or exceed this dry matter content include chicken, horse, sheep and goat,
and beef cattle (well-bedded)
- move temporary storage to different sites
each year to reduce the chance of nutrient build-up in the soil
- cover
the temporary storage with a tarp or geotextile to minimize potential for runoff.
For
More Information: - Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation
267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards.
- Temporary
Field Storage of Solid Manure or Prescribed Materials - OMAFRA Factsheet,
Order No.05-009
Issue: 8-10
Composting facility Runoff from a composting site needs to be managed.
If not, a composting site may have a serious impact on surface and ground water
quality. Off-farm environmental contamination caused by runoff from composting
sites could be addressed by the Drainage Act, Environmental Protection
Act, Water Resources Act, and/or the Fisheries Act. The Ontario
Building Code Act requires building permits for any required new structures (e.g.
concrete pad). For farms that are provincially-regulated through the Nutrient
Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols
and NSTS standards identify the minimum standards that in-field composting sites
must meet.(See Sections 83 to 86 of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and NSTS -08) What
can I do?Option #1 - Action Install a system with a concrete
or synthetic liner or otherwise hydraulically secure earthen floor and collect
and contain runoff from the composting facility: - install a properly
sized and designed runoff tank or earthen storage
- capture and re-apply
contaminated liquids to the compost pile or land apply as a liquid manure in accordance
with a nutrient management plan.
Option #2 - Action Follow
all the site management and setback requirements for in-field composting (temporary
manure storage) as outlined in Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended:
- a well-managed composting process requires full attention be paid to the
moisture content, dry matter content, C:N ratio and temperature of the material
being composted. Keep complete records of your composting management activities
including where pile is located, dates when pile turned, compost pile monitoring
results, compost analysis results and dates piles were established and removed.
For More Information: - Nutrient Management Act,
Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards
- Interim Guidelines for the Production and Use of Aerobic Compost in Ontario,
MOE Publication 1749
- Manure Composting as a Pathogen Reduction Strategy
- OMAFRA Factsheet, Order No. 05-021
ManagementIssue:
8-11 Transfer system (when liquid manure pumped from barn to storage) If
a transfer system fails, a liquid tank could empty causing significant environmental
damage or create a human and animal health hazard. Many livestock farms
have long-term liquid storage tanks located at an elevation higher than the barn
floor or gutter. If these farms do not have transfer pipes with an air break,
they must have a transfer system that relies on a valve to prevent backflow. If
your farm is in this category, you should review the equipment available and the
operating procedures used to prevent backflow. (See Sections 87 and 88 of O. Reg.
267/03, as amended, and NSTS-09) What can you do?Option - Action
Make modifications to transfer system to eliminate chance of backflow
by installing one or more of the following: - install an "air
gap" in line if long-term storage is located higher than gutter or transfer
storage
- install a second valve in transfer line and install an alarm
system to give warning if tank is about to overflow. (Note that for liquid manure
transfer systems regulated by the Nutrient Management Act a second check
valve is required to be compliant with the Nutrient Management Act).
For
More Information: - Automatic and Remote Controlled Shut-off Systems
for Direct Flow Liquid Manure System - OMAFRA Factsheet, Order 04-091
Issue:
8-12 Preventing roof water or upslope clean water from entering liquid or solid
storage Premature filling of a tank is commonly caused by excessive uncontrolled
entry of clean water. Proper control of clean water entry is one of the lowest
cost components to any manure management system. Reducing the amount of
water entering the storage will reduce the amount of contaminated water that must
be handled, and/or operating costs associated with handling runoff. What
can you do?Option #1 - Action Prevent any roof water or upslope
water from entering storage: - install properly sized eavestroughing
and outlet pipes to conduct water away from storage
- re-route any surface
water flows away from storage
- install diversion bumps at all entrances
to storage
- use a vegetated flowpath between the barn and storage to capture
roof water and conduct away from storage
- slope roofs away from storage.
For
More Information: - Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation
267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards.
- OMAFRA's
NMAN/MSTOR nutrient management and manure storage sizing software.
Issue:
8-13 Reducing volume of wastewater and manure entering storage Reducing
the volume of wastewater and manure entering storage reduces environmental risk
and operating costs associated with manure handling. What can you do?Option
- ActionAt least three of the following alternatives are required for
this to be considered acceptable: - Reduce use of washwater in barn:
- consider installation of higher pressure and/or hot washing systems that
use less washwater
- consider recycling of cleaning fluids
- use recaptured
washwater for flushing instead of clean water.
- Reduce
or eliminate leakage from drinkers:
- consider installation of wet/dry
feeders in swine finishing barn
- avoid plugging of drinkers (install filters,
new style drinkers etc.)
- maintain drinkers on a regular basis.
- Prevent clean water from entering the barn's gutter system.
- Increase efficiency of feed usage:
- use a proper nutritional
balance of feed components
- test feed for nutritional content
- avoid
spoilage and wasting of feed products.
For More Information:
- OMAFRA's NMAN/MSTOR nutrient management and manure storage sizing software.
- Best
Management Practices Books: Nutrient Management Planning, Order No. BMP
14; Manure Management, Order No. BMP 16
Issue:
8-14 Manure storage capacity Adequate storage/prescribed material provides
the opportunity to spread manure in an environmentally acceptable manner. Municipalities
may have by-laws setting minimum requirements for period of storage. The Nutrient
Management Act's Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, also sets minimum
storage requirements for provincially-regulated facilities. (See Sections
69 and 69.1 of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and associated protocols). (See
Sections 47 and 48 of O. Reg. 267/03, as amended, and Part 9.4 of the Nutrient
Management Protocol). What can you do?Option #1 - Action Increase
storage capacity to at least 240 days: - install an additional manure
storage
- increase size of existing storage (this may be difficult especially
for reinforced concrete storages)
- if cropping cycles, soil conditions
or your management choices as outlined in your nutrient management plan limit
manure application frequencies to only the spring or summer months, manure storage
capacity may need to be between 240 and 365 days.
Option #2 - ActionPrepare
a nutrient management plan: - an NMS/NMP will determine minimum days
of storage required.
Option #3 - Action Reduce input to
existing storage: - roof the storage - eliminating direct rainfall
allows for more available capacity for the storage of manure
- reduce volumes
of clean water or manure entry to storage (see options in #8-12 and #8-13 of this
infosheet)
- only house the number of animals for which there is adequate
manure storage capacity
- build a separate system for milking centre washwater
(e.g. sediment tank and treatment trench).
Option #4 - Action Arrange
for a licensed manure broker to store and transport your manure off-farm:
- written agreements with a broker should be obtained and are required if your
farm requires a nutrient management strategy/plan under either the Nutrient
Management Act or under a township bylaw
- check to ensure that the
manure broker has sufficient storage available (240 days) to handle the volume
of manure you are wanting to transfer off-farm.
For More Information:
- Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended,
and associated protocols and NSTS standards
- OMAFRA's NMAN/MSTOR nutrient
management and manure storage sizing software.
Issue:
8-15 Manure storage safety Storages must meet or exceed current safety
standards. Liquid storages create a potential safety hazard on the farm. Entry
into a storage can cause injury or death due to inhaling of gases or drowning.
Proper safety measures are required to address these hazards. Through the
Ontario Building Code Act, municipalities and townships will require building
permits that have acceptable design plans. Even if the farm no longer functions
as a livestock enterprise, there can be existing storages filled or partially
filled with liquids. These storages have the same safety concerns. What
can you do?Option #1 - Action Install all safety requirements:
- proper fence or barrier
- signs at all access points
-
remove ladder from storage
- install safety railing on all manure hopper
openings greater than 100 mm (4 in.)
- install valve or gas trap between
tank and barn.
Option #2 - Action Remove unused storage:
- make sure unused storage is properly decommissioned. Contact OMAFRA
for most recent information on requirements for decommissioning a manure storage.
For
More Information: - Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation
267/03, as amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards
- The
National Farm Building Code of Canada
- Safety Features Around Liquid
Manure Storage, OMAFRA Factsheet, Order No. 02-007
- Hazardous Gases,
OMAFRA Factsheet Order No. 99-001
Issue:
8-16 Contingency Plans All farmers should have a written contingency plan.
A contingency plan includes the following: - an "emergency plan"
which outlines steps to be taken in the event of a manure or fertilizer spill.
- steps to be taken in the event manure storages are filling up faster
than expected or weather conditions or equipment failures delay spreading.
For
Ontario farms regulated by the Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation
267/03, as amended, requires that a contingency plan be part of the farm's nutrient
management plan. (See Part 11 of O. Reg 267/03, as amended, the associated
protocol) What can you do?Option #1 - Action Prepare a
contingency plan covering the critical risk points on your operation (e.g. agricultural
materials storage facilities, manure transfer systems, spreading near surface
water, etc.) The "emergency plan" component of a contingency
plan should include a list of emergency telephone numbers including the MOE Spills
Action Centre, the local municipality, local emergency response or contracting
companies with the type of equipment needed to address a manure spill. It should
also include contact numbers for downstream water users who may be affected and
neighbours who could provide assistance in an emergency situation. The Nutrient
Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as amended, requires that contingency
plans, prepared for provincially regulated farms, also demonstrate that thought
has been given to handling the following situations: - the actual amount
of prescribed material ends up exceeding the design capacity of the storage facilities
available
- weather conditions delay application plans and manure storage
is at risk of exceeding capacity
- equipment unexpectedly becomes unavailable
or breaks down and manure capacity is at risk of being exceeded
- any other
situation that could result in the emergency handling of prescribed materials.
Example
contingency plans are available from OMAFRA to guide in their preparation. Contingency
plans, however, need to be tailored to the operation to which they apply (i.e.
address situations thought to be of highest risk. For More Information:
- The Nutrient Management Act, Ontario Regulation 267/03, as
amended, and associated protocols and NSTS standards
- Manure Spill Contingency
Plan Factsheet, 1999 (Livestock Manure Pollution Prevention Project)
- Best
Management Practices Book: Nutrient Management Planning, Order No. BMP
14
- Best Management Practices Book: Manure Management, Order No.
BMP 16
Infosheet Table
of Contents
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|