|
|
Summary Report: Agronomy
Forum on Agricultural Biomass for Combustion Energy
Table of Contents
-
- Introduction and Context
- Presentations and Forum Highlights
- Conclusions Emerging from the Forum
This report summarizes the information and views expressed by
speakers and participants at the forum.
Synopsis
|
What we currently know/understand
|
What we still need to know/gaps
|
|
Perennial grasses:
- Over the long term, perennials present more opportunities
than crop residues; annuals also have a role
- Switchgrass is suitable on lighter, well-drained soils;
Miscanthus prefers heavier soils
- Prairie polycultures provide biodiversity benefits and
benefit from long-term stands
- Plug establishment methods for Miscanthus and
suitable seeding methods for switchgrass
- Most weed control issues can be addressed
- Harvesting timing, equipment and methods
- Miscanthus (sterile crosses) and switchgrass
have low invasiveness potential
- Impact on soil carbon/soil quality
Short-rotation woody biomass:
- Good potential on marginal lands, fast growing, easy
to propagate, good site adaptability, good breeding potential
- Weed control (first year only)
- Challenges related to accessing plant stock as well
as planting and harvesting equipment
- High establishment costs
- Difficult to return the land to another crop after growing
willow
Crop residues
- Crop residues have a place but have sustainability,
logistical and cost challenges; soil compaction, trampling
and biomass quality are issues;
- Residue removal may be increased by using cover crops,
other organic soil amendments, etc.
|
Perennial grasses:
- Minor use registrations of herbicides not yet available
- Better understanding of weed control at all stages,
especially post-emergent grasses (C3 perennial grasses)
- Miscanthus hybrids and propagation methods that
reduce costs, decrease the variability of stand establishment
and enhance genetic diversity
- Miscanthus and switchgrass establishment, harvest
and yield on poorly drained, cold soils
- Optimal use of cover crops
- Optimal mix of polycultures and yields
- Use of perennial grasses as part of long-term rotations
- Technical aspects of storing undensified material
- Effect of harvest timing on moisture, yield and winter
survival
- Monitoring crop susceptibility to diseases and insects
- Effect on alternative uses
- Reliable markets
Short-rotation woody biomass:
- Life-cycle assessment (in progress)
- Reliable markets
Crop residues:
- What percentage is practically and sustainably available
for removal given the need to maintain soil organic matter
and nutrients, erosion protection, and long-term productivity
of the land, while being cost-effective
|
Introduction and Context
The Agronomy Forum was hosted by the Steering Committee for the
Project to Commercialize
Agricultural Biomass for Combustion Energy. The purpose of
this project is to coordinate the analysis of the feasibility
of a commercial agricultural biomass industry for combustion energy
in Ontario and, if feasible, set the foundation for the industry.
The Steering Committee is co-chaired by the Ontario Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) and Ontario Power
Generation (OPG).
As a key component of the Ontario government's Climate Change
Action Plan, OPG is exploring the conversion of coal-fired generating
units to firing, or natural gas co-firing, with biomass fuels
including wood pellets and agricultural biomass. The cement industry,
some agricultural operations (e.g. greenhouses) and others currently
reliant on coal or natural gas are also seeking renewable sources
of energy as a greenhouse gas mitigation measure.
The Ontario agricultural sector is increasingly interested in
the value chains and business models associated with the utilization
of agricultural biomass for energy generation. Consequently, there
is a need to co-ordinate and focus the efforts of the agricultural
and rural sectors, researchers and key partners to validate the
long-term prospects of this business opportunity in terms of technical
feasibility, economic viability and environmental sustainability.
The Steering Committee has three Working Groups composed of individuals
in the forefront of this emerging industry: the Business Case
Working Group, the Technical Working Group and the Environmental
Sustainability Working Group. Working Group members are called
on to share their expertise and provide insight to the Steering
Committee. The Technical Working Group, led by René Van
Acker of the University of Guelph, is focused on the agronomic,
infrastructure and combustion challenges of agricultural biomass.
The Agronomy Forum was organized by the Working Group.
Agronomy Forum Objective
The objective of the Agronomy Forum was to bring together Ontario-based
researchers, growers, entrepreneurs and others to share research
and business interests on agricultural biomass agronomy. Its purposes
were to facilitate the Technical Working Group's efforts to understand
the state of knowledge on agricultural biomass agronomy and to
provide an opportunity to transfer knowledge and learn from a
broad group of stakeholders across the province.
Speakers were asked to provide practical information on biomass
production (both energy crops and agricultural residues), as well
as a critical review of what is known and still needs to be known
to understand the feasibility of growing and harvesting agricultural
biomass. Participants were also encouraged to share information
and help identify gaps that may need to be filled as the Steering
Committee coordinates its analysis of the potential to commercialize
agricultural biomass for the production of combustion energy in
Ontario.
Participants
Registrants for the forum numbered 175. Approximately 100 attended
in person at the Arboretum Centre, University of Guelph. Additionally,
60 individuals participated via webcast from their own computers
and 15 participated via webcast from satellite meeting locations
(Thessalon, Sturgeon Falls, Ridgetown and Kemptville).
A broad spectrum of people, mostly from Ontario, took
part university researchers, agricultural producers, agricultural
industry organizations, consultants, biomass processors, potential
biomass end users, financial institutions and government staff
(federal, provincial and municipal). A few individuals participated
via webcast from other provinces.
Presentations and Forum Highlights
Please note that the full set of speaker presentations
is available here.
Below are highlights from each presentation plus a summary of
input received from forum participants.
Perennial Grasses Panel: Miscanthus, Switchgrass, Polycultures
Growing, Harvesting, Storage, Sustainability
Dean Tiessen, New Energy Farms - Miscanthus
Dean is founder of New Energy Farms Ltd. and has been
working with dedicated energy crops for over four years. He started
by looking for a long-term economic solution to energy for Pyramid
Farm's greenhouse vegetable operation in Leamington, Ontario.
With offices in the UK, USA and Canada, New Energy Farms focuses
on the development of long-term, sustainable feedstock solutions
for various end-use applications.
New Energy Farms not only works with Miscanthus but many other
dedicated perennial biomass species like energy cane, switchgrass,
Napier Grass, and woody crops (e.g.willow), as well as annual
crops like sorghum.
-
Miscanthus has many beneficial characteristics: e.g.
low inputs (fertilizers, crop protection products), high yields
and returns, few pest issues, positive energy balance, contribution
to biodiversity, soil erosion mitigation and carbon sequestration
(1 1.18 tonne/acre/year), use of regular harvesting equipment,
sustainable yields for up to 20 years, efficient water use,
opportunities for full value chain development from farm to
end user, ability to grow in any region of Ontario (different
varieties available)
-
Establishment costs range from $340 to $480 per acre; land
preparation costs approximately $150 per acre
-
Yields higher on good soils; range in different geographies
is reported to be 8 to 26 dry tonnes/acre; 3rd year Leamington
crop is yielding 21-25 dry tonnes/acre
-
Heavier soils are best for Miscanthus
-
Currently planted from rhizomes but researchers are working
on seeded varieties
-
Currently enough foundation material (rhizomes) to plant
80,000 acres in Ontario; New Energy Farms has foundation sites
around the province
-
Late winter/spring harvest; 15-20 per cent moisture
-
Stored in bales that are covered with sheet of polyethylene
to repel precipitation, depending on the end use
-
Base energy value is 16.9 million BTU/tonne of dry matter
(17.9 gigajoules/tonne)
-
Value of carbon offset credits on the voluntary market is
currently approximately $12/unit in Ontario; in the EU, it's
14 euros; research is needed to validate this
-
Miscanthus can be grown in Ontario, but a big hurdle
is the need for market development and an understanding of the
price that markets will pay
Don Nott, Nott Farms - Switchgrass
Nott Farms operate 2,800 acres near Clinton, Ontario. Don
has been farming since 1967. Along with his wife and family, they
operate a grain processing facility year-round. For relaxation,
Don dabbles in growing switchgrass, currently at 345 acres.
-
Switchgrass is the most risk-free crop a farmer can grow.
It has a high tolerance for temperature and precipitation extremes,
is not susceptible to mould or fungus, outruns weeds, does not
spoil in the field (in the swath), makes use of standard farm
equipment (balers, forage harvesters, discbines), is carbon
neutral, friendly to wildlife, prevents erosion, improves soil
structure, and can be grown on marginal soils and in hilly areas
-
Soils should be lighter, with reasonable drainage; not good
on wet soils; field-tile-friendly
-
Nine to 10 pounds of seed per acre are used to establish
the crop
-
In Huron County, Cave-in-Rock variety is recommended; in
first year, it may be planted with a cover crop (e.g. oats or
wheat) as a weed control measure and to provide a source of
income; no fertilizer in first year (would encourage weeds)
-
In second year, weed control and fertilization (40 pounds
of nitrogen and potash per acre) are recommended; 50% yield
potential
-
In year three, fertilization is optional; no herbicides are
required; yield is 4 - 4.5 dry tonnes/acre on land capable of
producing normal yields of corn, soybeans and wheat
-
Cut with four- to five-inch stubble in late fall and left
in swaths on the field over the winter to enable nutrients and
other elements to leach out
-
Harvest in April to early May; late harvest means chlorine,
ash, phosphorus and nitrogen levels are reduced, making the
biomass better for combustion; seven to eight per cent moisture;
sharp stubble is hard on tires
-
Can store in covered storage, with bale wrap or in a traditional
straw stack; if baled wet, will not heat up
-
Volumes available are still unknown
Kurt Vanclief, Willowlee Sod Farm - Switchgrass
Kurt Vanclief began farming in 1987 when he purchased his
first farm in Prince Edward County and started cash cropping.
In 1999, he and his wife began a sod farm, Willowlee Sod. They
continued to cash crop on the side as well. Willowlee Sod Farms
has grown quickly in its 10 years of business and has diversified
to include landscape and snow services as well as its current
endeavour in biomass.
-
Potential to produce and consume biomass in the local community
is appealing
-
70-acre crop established in 2006:
-
Year 1: no-till seeding of Cave-in-Rock with John Deere
750; no cover crop; seeded late May; heavy weeds
-
Year 2: harvest and baling in spring (1.5 tonnes/acre)
-
Year 3: broadcast urea and potash blend; no weed control
weed pressure virtually gone; swathed in mid March, harvested
with forage harvester, stored in "Ag-Bag" (3 tonnes/acre)
-
Year 4: fertilized with urea; applied N from 0 to 200
lbs/acre; spot sprayed for dandelions; crop swathed in January
2010
-
46-acre crop establishment in 2009:
-
Constructing small-scale pellet plant
-
Challenges: balancing efficient production with capital requirements,
keeping storage costs to a minimum, deriving an appropriate
value in the marketplace, significant opportunity cost due to
the long establishment period (cash flow issue); incorporating
other types of biomass while maintaining quality, diversifying
markets beyond heat
-
Industry challenges: need network of industry members, market
stability to maintain product quality, furnaces that create
end-user confidence, offering a system that encourages conversion
from fossil fuels, knowledge of combustion and emissions, lower
costs for transportation and storage
Bryan Gilvesy, Norfolk Alternative Land Use Services (ALUS)
Prairie Polycultures
Bryan Gilvesy is a graduate of the Richard Ivey School of
Business at the University of Western Ontario. He is the proprietor
of the Y U Ranch and Chair of the Norfolk County Alternative Lands
Use Services (ALUS) Pilot Project. The Y U Ranch, located in Norfolk
County, produces beef certified by Local Food Plus, dealing directly
with consumers in Southern Ontario. The Norfolk ALUS Pilot Project
is an innovative, emerging program that envisions farmers as key
environmental solution-providers.
-
ALUS pays farmers growing polycultures $150/acre for biodiversity
benefits (e.g. habitat for endangered species like badgers and
bobolinks)
-
Can include up to 52 different grass species; high diversity
-
Bryan characterizes what he is doing as harvesting solar
energy
-
Roots provide carbon storage and fix nitrogen; potentially
carbon-negative (i.e., carbon credit opportunity)
-
Planted in 15-inch rows to allow filling in
-
Clump grasses plus a range of flowers e.g. cup plant, compass
plant (both of which are 10 feet tall) and Echinacea
add energy density
-
Show Me Energy (a co-operative in Missouri) claims 6-7000
BTU/lb is achievable on grass only and approximately 8,000 BTU/lb
on a grass/flower mixture
-
Polycultures do better in 20th year (long-lived); Walpole
Island has 1000-year-old stands
-
Grasses thrive in hotter temperatures and are drought-tolerant
-
Since seed is "fluffy" (feather-like), a special seeder is
used (no-till drill with extra seed box to handle fluffy seed
and another box to hold seed that flows)
-
Emerges in late May (seed right before it turns 30°C);
this helps reduce competition with weeds
-
Not sure what yields are; reports range from 4-8 tonnes/acre
-
Challenges include needing a better understanding of: soil
carbon, use of legumes for nitrogen, the mix of polycultures
that pelletizer will demand (i.e. standardization) and that
will maximize yield, how invasion from cool-season species can
be avoided, whether prairie grasses can be part of long-term
rotations (to take advantage of soil carbon that builds up),
and yields that can be expected
Bill Deen, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph
Overview of Perennial Grasses
Bill Deen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Plant
Agriculture at the University of Guelph. Dr Deen's expertise relates
to agronomy, physiology and functioning of field crop agro-ecosystems.
In recent years, he has initiated trials to examine productivity,
soil quality, and carbon and nutrient cycling in bioenergy crop
systems.
-
Picture is still emerging and some aspects are still unclear;
no need to wait for full certainty to proceed
-
Research is completed or underway to: compare different varieties
of perennial grasses, compare herbaceous biomass to woody (poplar
and willow), understand tall grass prairie agronomy, complete
life cycle assessments, predict biomass availability, undertake
Miscanthus vs. switchgrass comparisons, compare 26 Miscanthus
genotypes, evaluate cold tolerance and develop weed control
procedures
-
What we know about perennial grasses for biomass production:
-
Energy crops have more potential than agricultural residues
-
Residues have significant technical and sustainability
constraints
-
Varieties are available for Southwestern Ontario with
reasonable winter tolerance including avoidance of lodging
-
Suitable seeding methods are known for switchgrass
-
Experience is building with plug establishment methods
for Miscanthus, but there is still some uncertainty
-
Understanding of pre-emergent grass and broadleaf weed
control as well as post-emergent broadleaf weed control
-
Nitrogen will be required to maintain soil tilth
-
Fall and spring switchgrass and Miscanthus yield,
moisture, nutrient content, nutrient removal rates
-
Miscanthus yields are: Nagara sp. between
16.5-19.5 dry tonnes/ha harvested in fall; 10 dry tonnes/ha
for switchgrass (30% reduction when collected dry in spring)
-
Technical aspects of harvesting and storage
-
Techniques to eradicate Miscanthus and switchgrass
-
Low invasive potential of Miscanthus (M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus) and
switchgrass
-
Soil carbon/soil quality effects
-
What we don't know:
-
Minor use registration of herbicides
-
Post-emergent grass control, particularly C3 perennial
grasses
-
Transitioning from a sod or pasture is a crop year
required?
-
Miscanthus propagation methods that reduce cost
and decrease variability of stand establishment
-
Effect of land class and crop heat units on yield (particularly
Miscanthus)
-
Miscanthus/switchgrass establishment, harvest
and yield on poorly drained, cold soils
-
Technical aspects of storing undensified material (Don
Nott working on this)
-
Alternative uses livestock bedding, livestock feed,
anaerobic digestion (producers need options)
-
Effect of harvest timing on moisture, yield and winter
survival
-
Polycultures (all current work is focused on monocultures)
-
Varity development/enhancing Miscanthus genetic
diversity
-
Susceptibility to disease and insects
-
Need combustion demonstrations collect data, test a
range of materials
-
Availability of financing options (harvest in spring
of year four, followed by combustion)
-
Policy/program development some incentive is needed
to get biomass going like what's provided for solar and
other technologies
Short Rotation Woody Biomass Growing, Harvesting, Storage,
Sustainability
Naresh Thevathasan, School of Environmental Sciences, University
of Guelph
Naresh is Manager of Agroforestry Research and Development
at the University of Guelph (U of G) and an Adjunct Professor
in U of G's School of Environmental Sciences. He is the director
of a project in India funded by the Canadian International Development
Agency titled Open Distance Learning for Seed Technology, and
the manager for another CIDA-funded project in Ghana, West Africa
titled Agroforestry Practices to Enhance Resource-Poor Livelihoods.
-
U of G has approximately 55 acres of willow planted
-
170,000 ha of degraded, marginal farmland for plantations
within 100 km of Niagara and Essex counties; not targeting prime
agricultural land
-
100-km radius is considered the "economic growing zone"
-
Selection of equipment to minimize carbon emissions is important;
Swedish Step Planter thought to be preferable; it cuts whips
into 25 cm segments and jams them into the soil
-
Trials underway on agroforesty and monoculture sites
-
Land preparation should start the year before planting; post-emergent
weed control required to get good establishment; no herbicides
after second year
-
Hybrid clones being used; 15,000 stems/ha
-
Coppicing results in 40,000+ stems/ha
-
Fertilization every three years
-
Allow to grow for three years prior to first harvest; seven
cycles are possible before replanting
-
First harvest yields 6 dry tonnes/ha/year
-
First willow bale harvester in Canada used from Quebec
(Anderson biobaler) with a Fendt tractor
-
Allow to winter dry in field; in May, bales have approximately
12-16% moisture
-
Biomass was pelletized at Remasco in Kingsville, ON and used
to heat greenhouses
-
Keeping track of all greenhouse gases associated with willow
biomass production; no net on-farm carbon emissions
-
Leaf litter cycling is efficient method of nutrient cycling
-
Challenges: weed control during first year only, no commercially
available supply of plant stock, availability of planters and
harvesters, need for business model, need for conversion technologies
-
Poplar has high establishment costs, but may be good on very
marginal land
-
To return land to another agricultural rotation, growers
(e.g. in Chile) use glyphosate to kill the crop; willows will
then decompose over next six to seven years
Agricultural Residues Crops, Harvesting Logistics, Soil Sustainability
Ian McDonald, Applied Research Coordinator, Field Crops, OMAFRA
Ian McDonald is responsible for on-farm research and demonstration
coordination within the Field Crops Unit of OMAFRA's Agriculture
Development Branch. He is involved in scientific review, protocol
and project development, data analysis, and reporting, among other
functions within the branch.
Ian investigates crops and agriculture-based feedstocks for
appropriate opportunities in the emerging bioeconomy including
types, agronomy, economics and environmental benefits.
-
Crop residue includes corn stover, corn cobs, soybean stubble,
cereal straw
-
Comprises only a small portion of total available agricultural
biomass in Ontario
-
Theoretical volume in millions of tonnes is corn 5.37; soybean
2.12; wheat 2.24; forages 5.16; for a total of 14.9
-
Practically and sustainably available volumes are much less
-
Concerns over soil compaction, trampling, nutrient cycling,
small window for harvesting given the timing of other cropping
demands and weather, labour, equipment modifications to pick
up residue (new equipment under development), contamination
with soil and stones, storage and competing uses
-
Corn cobs can easily be captured during harvest
-
Break-even price ranges from $58 to $69/tonne
-
Competing uses include livestock bedding, mushrooms, vegetable
mulch, industrial uses
-
Sustainability is based on soil organic matter, soil erosion
protection, nutrient replacement, and long term productivity
of the land
-
Winter wheat has 1.6 times as much biomass below ground as
above
-
Minimum amount required to financially justify harvest is
500 kg/ha/year
-
To increase residue amounts, could increase rotation complexity,
add cover crops, or add other organic amendments such as manure,
biosolids, compost or biogas digestate
-
Research needed on long-term productivity of the land, amount
of sustainable removal, true cost, and impact of removal on
subsequent crop yields
-
See "Assessment of the Availability of Agricultural Biomass
for Heat and Energy Production in Ontario" (Hilla Kludze, Bill
Deen et al, University of Guelph)
Agricultural Biomass Opportunities in Northern
Ontario
John Rowsell, Head, Northern Stations, University of Guelph
John Rowsell has lived in northern Ontario for 32 years. A
Master's graduate from the University of Guelph, he has evolved
from a lecturer in Soil Science at the New Liskeard College of
Agricultural Technology to an agronomist who has administrative
responsibilities for the research stations in New Liskeard and
Emo. Northern Ontario is a big place a vast and magnificent
land and he is humbled to be its servant.
-
Large expanses of limestone deposits and clay belts in Northern
Ontario
-
4.4 million acres of Canada Land Inventory Classes 2 to 4
soils suitable for cultivation including biomass: 9.3% of Ontario's
Class 2 land; 50.4% of Ontario's Class 3 land; 67.8% of Class
4 land
-
2.2 million acres have climate limited soils (i.e. can't
grow field tomatoes) which are suitable for canola and forage
grasses, and in fact, are even better than Essex County
-
Stone free, lacustrine clay belt has fairly well drained
soils
-
Lake Abitibi area is farmland in Quebec and forest in Ontario;
Quebec aggressively pursuing agricultural development, while
Ontario is not; this is a policy issue rather than related to
soil or climate
-
Only 2% of the Great Clay Belt (Cochrane area) is used for
agriculture; 80-100 frost-free days; crop heat units 2100 to
2700
-
Forages, spring cereals and canola dominate, with silage
corn, soybeans and winter wheat on the rise; breeders producing
earlier varieties that are well suited to the north
-
Working on reed canary grass, switchgrass and straw from
spring cereals for biomass
-
Switchgrass tends to be very leafy; not getting as much stem
as in the south (which is what is required for energy)
-
Competing use: mining industry uses straw for reclamation
-
Non-food canola could be used for energy; energy content
is high at 28 megajoules/kg (compared with wood at 18 MJ/kg
and coal at 32 MJ/kg); tested at CANMET Energy Technology Centre,
Natural Resources Canada; clean burning
Discussion/Input from Participants
Participants at the forum were asked to add to the speakers'
information by sharing their views on what is known and still
needs to be known on agricultural biomass agronomy. Below is a
summary of their input on biomass agronomy and other related areas.
|
What we currently know/understand
|
What we still need to know/gaps
|
- Need for pre-emergent grass and broadleaf weed control,
especially on marginal land
- Proven harvesting techniques exist
- May need to fertilize in first year, particularly on
marginal soils
- Storage options are known and available
- Perennial energy crops have agronomic, economic and
environmental benefits over annual energy crops
- Annual crops do have a role
- Energy crops hold more potential than agricultural residues
due to sustainability and harvest timelines
- Three-year or longer wait from planting seed/rhizomes
to sale of crop poses significant cash flow issues
- "Buy local fuel" may capture the public's imagination,
like local food
- Some research being done in Algoma on speckled alder;
may have greater potential in the north
- Need to look beyond switchgrass and Miscanthus; others
have as good as or better potential
- Cellulosic ethanol is also worth pursuing, although
Canadian experience is limited
|
- Effect of soil capability for agriculture and crop heat
units on yields; more work on using poorer capability
soils
- Access to registered herbicides
- Susceptibility to pests and diseases
- More research on polycultures and optimal combinations
of plants, use of cover crops, crop selection with low
chlorine and potassium levels
- More residue removal studies
- Potential to use non-grasses e.g. canola, other oilseeds
for energy crops
- Methods of Miscanthus propagation; growers not
familiar with rhizome separation and transplantation
- Market development (end uses); need to look at heating
systems used in Scandinavia and elsewhere in Europe
- Economic analysis of the value chain; return on investment;
how to cover costs until first harvest; current FIT price
is insufficient to promote establishment
- Tested combustion appliances
- How combustion efficiency compares with other renewable
energy technologies (GJ/tonne and $/GJ); comparison of
decentralized power generation vs. centralized
- How to achieve year-round supply given seasonality of
harvest and of use (re: heat)
- What fuel standard must be met?
- Will public policy support?
- Social acceptance (food vs. fuel)
- Should energy crop production be directed to particular
geographic areas?
- More research on other high value uses of biomass e.g.
biomaterials
- OPG's future use of biomass in southern Ontario generating
stations
- Economical densification (cubes, pellets, wafers, pucks)
to meet end users' needs
- Lifecycle assessment, including a comparison of perennial
grasses to forestry biomass
- Energy crop impact on ground and surface water
- Potential for organic certification
- Research on carbon sequestration
|
Conclusions Emerging from the Forum
The knowledge base on the key issues related to agricultural
biomass production and harvesting is building quickly. Growers
can and are addressing agronomic challenges. Biomass production
is low-risk from the production perspective, but market certainty
must be in place for farmers to make the leap to this new opportunity.
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|