In This Section |
Soil Fertility and Nutrient Use: Manure Management
| Corn |
Soybeans | Forages
| Cereals | Dry
Edible Beans | Pub 811: Agronomy Guide > Soil Fertility and Nutrient Use > Manure Management Excerpt from Agronomy Guide for Field Crops
The Value of ManureThe value of manure in crop production is often under-estimated. Manure contains all of the nutrients needed by crops but not necessarily in the proportions needed for specific soil and crop conditions. In addition to nitrogen, phosphorus and potash, manure contains many secondary nutrients and micronutrients, as well as organic matter that help build and maintain soil structure. An Example
The equivalent amount of commercial fertilizer can be calculated using Table 9-8, Typical Amounts of Available Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash From Different Types of Organic Nutrient Sources, and Table 9-13, Typical Manure Analysis by Livestock Type. At the sample prices for commercial fertilizer shown in this chart, the approximate value of the manure is $600/ha ($243/acre), assuming that all nutrients are needed by the crop. 1 Price based on average commercial fertilizer costs in 2008. Nutrient Management PlansA nutrient management plan matches the nutrients available from manure, cover crops, commercial fertilizer and the soil to the nutrients required by the crop. Analysis of nutrients contained in the manure, along with soil test results and crop requirements, help determine the manure application rate and additional commercial fertilizer requirements. A nutrient management plan may restrict the rate of manure or fertilizer applied if that application could create certain risks, as shown below:
1 Late fall application or early application with cover crop. Availability of Manure Nitrogen to CropsThe amount of nitrogen contained in manure that is available to crops will depend on the characteristics of the manure, the time that it is applied and how soon following application the manure is incorporated into the soil. The relevant manure characteristics are the total N content, the proportion that is in the mineral (ammonium) and organic forms, and the rate of breakdown of the organic material to release mineral N. Mineral Nitrogen From ManureAmmonium-N (NH4-N) is immediately available to the crop, as
nitrogen is from mineral fertilizers, but it is also subject to volatile
loss to the air. Manure from different farming systems contains varying
proportions of organic and ammonium-N. Liquid manure contains a higher
proportion of the nitrogen in the ammonium form than solid manure. The
proportion of ammonium-N and organic-N can be determined from a manure
analysis, or estimated from the values in Table 9-9,
Approximate Ammonium-Nitrogen as a Percentage of Total Nitrogen in Various
Manure Types.
Source: NMAN software. 1 Ammonium content increases as liquid concentration increases. As soon as the manure is applied to the field, the ammonium-N starts to volatilize into the air. This process continues until the manure is moved into the soil by incorporation or rainfall, or until the ammonium-N in the manure is depleted to the point that it is stable. Manures that are incorporated quickly will provide much more nitrogen to the crop. The rate of ammonium-N loss will depend on the soil moisture and weather conditions at the time of application. Moist soils increase the opportunity for ammonium to be absorbed in the soil water. Warm temperatures increase the rate of ammonium loss to the air. The estimated losses under various conditions are listed in Table 9-10, Estimated Percentage of Ammonium-N Lost Due to Weather and Soil Conditions. The balance of ammonium-N that remains in the soil is available for crop uptake, or for loss to the environment if there is no crop present to take up the nitrogen.
Adapted from Beauschamp, University of Guelph, 1995.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Dairy | ||||||
| Solid average |
S
|
25
|
0.59
|
0.12
|
0.17
|
0.49
|
|
30% + |
S
|
39
|
0.65
|
0.08
|
0.17
|
0.53
|
| 18%30% |
S
|
21
|
0.57
|
0.13
|
0.16
|
0.48
|
| Liquid average |
L
|
8.4
|
0.35
|
0.15
|
0.08
|
0.24
|
| 10%18% |
L
|
14
|
0.49
|
0.18
|
0.14
|
0.32
|
| 6%10% |
L
|
8.0
|
0.36
|
0.16
|
0.07
|
0.24
|
| 2%6% |
L
|
4.4
|
0.24
|
0.12
|
0.05
|
0.19
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Beef | ||||||
| Solid average |
S
|
25
|
0.59
|
0.12
|
0.17
|
0.49
|
|
30% + |
S
|
39
|
0.65
|
0.08
|
0.17
|
0.53
|
| 18%30% |
S
|
21
|
0.57
|
0.13
|
0.16
|
0.48
|
| Liquid average |
L
|
8.4
|
0.35
|
0.15
|
0.08
|
0.24
|
| 10%18% |
L
|
14
|
0.49
|
0.18
|
0.14
|
0.32
|
| 6%10% |
L
|
8.0
|
0.36
|
0.16
|
0.07
|
0.24
|
| 2%6% |
L
|
4.4
|
0.24
|
0.12
|
0.05
|
0.19
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Runoff | ||||||
| 0%2% |
L
|
0.7
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
0.09
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Horses | ||||||
| 0%2% |
S
|
37
|
0.50
|
0.07
|
0.15
|
0.43
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Sheep | ||||||
| Average |
S
|
34
|
0.80
|
0.23
|
0.28
|
0.78
|
| 80% + |
S
|
85
|
3.36
|
0.21
|
1.69
|
1.74
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Poultry | ||||||
| Layers |
S
|
34
|
1.93
|
0.78
|
0.89
|
0.80
|
| Pullets |
S
|
48
|
3.14
|
0.72
|
1.36
|
1.35
|
| Broilers |
S
|
68
|
3.09
|
0.44
|
1.33
|
1.52
|
| Liquid average |
L
|
11
|
0.82
|
0.56
|
0.30
|
0.30
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Poultry | ||||||
| Layers |
S
|
34
|
1.93
|
0.78
|
0.89
|
0.80
|
| Pullets |
S
|
48
|
3.14
|
0.72
|
1.36
|
1.35
|
| Broilers |
S
|
68
|
3.09
|
0.44
|
1.33
|
1.52
|
| Liquid average |
L
|
11
|
0.82
|
0.56
|
0.30
|
0.30
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
| DM Range | Solid/ Liquid |
Ave. DM |
Total N |
Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | NH4-N1 | P | K | |
| Biosolids | ||||||
| Aerobic |
L
|
2.0
|
0.12
|
0.01
|
0.06
|
0
|
| Anaerobic |
L
|
4.4
|
0.28
|
0.08
|
0.14
|
0
|
| Dewatered |
S
|
32
|
3.76
|
0.34
|
1.31
|
0.11
|
1 To convert from % to ppm, multiply by 10,000.
Details for interpreting a manure analysis are shown in Calculating Available Nutrients from Spring-Applied Manure Using a Manure Analysis, next page. Information from a manure analysis, plus knowledge of the conditions at the time the manure was applied, can be used to provide a more precise estimate of the available nutrients in the manure applied to your fields.
There are two nitrogen components in manure. Ammonium-nitrogen makes up the largest percentage of the nitrogen in liquid manure with approximate percentages listed by livestock type in Table 9-9, Approximate Ammonium-Nitrogen as a Percentage of Total Nitrogen in Various Manure Types. The organic-N component is available over time as the organic matter breaks down, similar to a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. About 20%-30% of the organic nitrogen component of manure is assumed to be available to a growing crop in the year of application. The percentage is generally higher in poultry and lower for ruminant livestock manure.
Ammonium-N is immediately available to a growing crop but is also easily lost to volatilization unless incorporated soon after application. Soil moisture and weather conditions will determine how quickly and how much loss to expect. These losses are highest on sunny, warm days, when soils are dry; losses are lowest when conditions are overcast and cold (<10°C), when soils are moist or during rainy periods. Table 9-10, Estimated Percentage of Ammonium-Nitrogen Lost Due to Weather and Soil Conditions, gives estimated losses due to weather and soil conditions only for the ammonium-nitrogen component of manure. With manure applied in late fall, the losses are low since cooler temperatures slow down microbial action in soil, which minimizes conversion. Losses can be high due to runoff from late fall applications, especially when not incorporated. Denitrification and leaching losses of nitrogen are dealt with in Nitrogen Risk Mitigation.
Table 9-11, Estimated Percentage of Organic Nitrogen Available in Year of Application, gives estimated nitrogen available from the organic nitrogen portion of the manure based on livestock type.
The long-term availability of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium, zinc or manganese from previous manure applications is best estimated by soil testing. Application of large quantities of manure over time can result in high levels of available P and K in soils. Manure also provides organic matter and other plant nutrients to the soil that will contribute to improved soil physical structure and buffering capacity.
| Available Nitrogen1 | Available Phosphate2 | Available Potash2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Total Nitrogen | H. Total Phosphorus | K. Total Potassium | |||
| B. Ammonium-N | I. Available Phosphorus (H x 0.4) |
L. Available Potassium (K x 0.9) |
|||
| C. Organic N3 (A-B) |
J. Available Phosphate (I x 2.29) |
M. Available Potash (L x 1.2) |
|||
| D. Ammonium Losses (B x factor from Table 9-10) |
|||||
| E. Available Ammonium (B-D) |
|||||
| F. Available Organic N (C x factor from Table 9-11) |
|||||
| G. Total Available N (E+F)4 |
1 Available nitrogen is determined by subtracting the ammonia
losses to the air from the ammonium-N applied and adding the mineralization
from the organic N portion of the manure.
2 Calculate reductions in fertilizer phosphate and potash by
determining the available portion of the total P and K in the manure (40%
for phosphorus and 90% for potassium) and multiplying by a factor to convert
from the elemental form to the oxide form (fertilizer nutrients are expressed
in the oxide form). In the year of application, 40% is available; another
40% is available in following year.
3 Organic N will also give an N credit for several years after
application: 10% in 2nd year, 5% in 3rd year, x 2% in 4th year.
4 To estimate the available N from summer or fall applications
of manure, multiply the Total N content by the appropriate factor in Table
9-12, Estimate of Available Nitrogen From Late Summer- and Fall-Applied
Manure.
For Values in Percent
To get
kg/1000 L multiply by 10
lb/1,000 gal multiply by 100
kg/tonne multiply by 10
lb/ton multiply by 20
Example: Dairy manure is spring applied at (5,000 gal/acre) under cool,
dry conditions ahead of planting corn (incorporated within 3 days); DM
content is 7%; total N is 0.65%; ammonium N is 0.35%; total P is 0.2%,
total K is 0.3% (as-is basis)
| Available Nitrogen1 | Available Phosphate2 | Available Potash2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Total Nitrogen |
0.65
|
H. Total Phosphorus |
0.2
|
K. Total Potassium |
0.3
|
| B. Ammonium-N |
0.35
|
I. Available Phosphorus (H x 0.4) |
0.08
|
L. Available Potassium (K x 0.9) |
0.27
|
| C. Organic N3 (A-B) |
0.30
|
J. Available Phosphate (I x 2.29) |
0.18
|
M. Available Potash (L x 1.2) |
0.32
|
| D. Ammonium Losses (B x factor from Table 9-10) |
0.13
|
||||
| E. Available Ammonium (B-D) |
0.22
|
||||
| F. Available Organic N (C x factor from Table 9-11) |
0.06
|
||||
| G. Total Available N (E+F)4 |
28
|
||||
| Nutrients lb/1,000 gallons |
28
|
18 | 32 | ||
An electronic version of this worksheet can be found in the OMAFRA NMAN software or as a spreadsheet at www.gocorn.net.
Most of the available nitrogen in manure is used by the crop or is lost during the first growing season following application. The remaining organic nitrogen becomes available in small, diminishing quantities in the succeeding years. Generally, the amount of residual nitrogen from one application of liquid manure is too small to make a practical difference in nitrogen recommendations for a crop. However, where solid manure is applied regularly to the same field, there can be significant residual nitrogen available for a crop. Use regular soil testing for P and K to measure residual levels of these nutrients from manure applications.
Soil test results and yield goals will determine the maximum economic manure application rate and/or additional fertilizer requirements. Often soil test levels on livestock farms indicate that soil fertility levels are high enough that we do not expect any response to additional fertility.
An alternative to determining application rates from soil test values is to apply manure based on the amount of nutrients removed by a crop and then match phosphorus and/or nitrogen from manure to determine an application rate. In theory this method should keep soil fertility levels constant. Table 9-14, Average Nutrient (N, P, K) Removal by Common Field Crops, will help determine the average nutrient removal for various crops.
If manure is applied to meet the entire nitrogen requirements of a corn crop, there will usually be more P and K applied than the crop will remove, and soil test levels will increase. For liquid manure, an application goal of two-thirds to three-quarters of the nitrogen requirements for a corn crop is a reasonable compromise. The high carbon content in the bedding materials of solid manure makes the release of nitrogen much less predictable. Due to difficulty in uniform application for both solid and liquid manure, starter fertilizer is still recommended unless soil test results indicate that there will be no economic response to additional fertilizer.
Take into account residual nitrogen from legume crops when determining additional nitrogen needs from manure or fertilizer (see Table 9-7, Adjustment of Nitrogen Requirement, Where Crops Containing Legumes Are Plowed Down). Apply manure to cereal crops, soybeans or canola with caution, since too high a rate will increase the potential for lodging. For summer application to standing crops such as corn or forages, keep rates below 45,000 L/ha (4,000 gal/acre) or 55-65 kg/ha (50-60 lb/acre) ammonium nitrogen. Complete application to forages as soon as possible after harvest to avoid wheel track damage to new growth and potential nitrogen burn to new leaf growth. Older forage stands with higher grass content will benefit most from the manure nitrogen. Do not apply concentrated manures with high ammonium-nitrogen levels (e.g., liquid layer poultry or concentrated finisher hog manure) into standing crops.
Soil compaction is a problem for many growers and is the main reason
that late summer or early fall manure application is so popular. Compaction
leads to poor drainage and decreased aeration. The best way to reduce
or avoid soil compaction from manure application is to spread manure when
the soil is dry. Loads should stay below 4.5 tonnes (5 tons) per axle.
Spring spreading is often carried out on fields where soils are too wet,
and it is not unusual for strips of stunted crops to reveal the location
of wheel traffic from application equipment.
Manure is still one of the factors that make livestock farmers think twice about no-till systems. When manure is utilized in a no-till system, there has to be a compromise - some tillage or some loss of nutrients from manure.
A few points to consider when applying manure in a no-till system:
Source: Based on Ontario data where possible and general North American
data where local data was insufficient.
Forage crop data from Agri-Food Laboratories, Guelph. (1990-95).
1 The range of P and K in cereal straw and dry hay will be
reduced (leached) if heavy or frequent rainfall occurs while the material
is in windrows in the field.
2 Soybeans, dry beans and forage legumes receive most of their
nitrogen from the air.
| Silage/Forage Crops |
Removal in DM3 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| N4 | P205 | K20 | |
| Corn Silage |
11-15
(22-30) |
4.6-6.8
(9.3-14) |
8.3-15
(17-30) |
| Legume haylage |
27-37
(53-73) |
5.3-7.9
(11-16) |
22-35
(45-71) |
| Mixed haylage |
23-34
(46-68) |
5.2-7.8
(10-16) |
22-35
(45-71) |
| Grass haylage |
16-27
(32-55) |
4.9-7.8
(9.8-16) |
20-36
(41-72) |
| Legume hay |
22-33
(45-66) |
5.2-8.0
(10-16) |
21-35
(41-70) |
| Mixed hay |
17-27
(34-55) |
5.0-0.2
(10-14) |
17-30
(34-59) |
| Grass hay (1st cut) |
13-23
(26-45) |
4.4-7.0
(8.8-14) |
14-28
(28-56) |
| Mixed hay (2nd cut)5 |
25-36
(51-72) |
5.7-7.8
(11-16) |
20-32
(40-64) |
Source: Based on Ontario data where possible and general North American
data where local data was insufficient.
Forage crop data from Agri-Food Laboratories, Guelph. (1990-95).
3 To convert from "as harvested" to "dry matter
yield," multiply the as-harvested yield by the dry matter content
of the crop (e.g., 25T corn silage x 40% DM (60% moisture) = DM yield
of 10T)
4 The range of N removal is large, because hay is harvested
at a wide range of protein levels. Generally, higher protein means lower
yield.
5 2nd cut generally has a higher legume content.
Calibrating manure application equipment is essential. Several methods
can be used to measure spreading rates. Weighing a load of manure and
measuring the area that load covers is one method of estimating the rate
of application. Weigh solid manure by placing plastic sheets on the ground
and liquid manure by using straight-walled pails for measuring depth of
application. Consider overlap, especially in irrigation systems. Table
9-15, Calibrating Manure Spreaders, gives an estimate of application
rates, while Table 9-16, Densities of Different Types
of Manure, distinguishes between the densities of different types
of manure. For further detail, visit the OMAFRA website at www.ontario.ca/crops.
1 Using a 122 cm x 102 cm sheet (40 in. x 48 in. plastic feedbag).
2 Using a straight-walled pail.
3 Tons per acre = tonnes per hectare x 0.45.
Using manure to meet but not exceed crop nutrient needs will help minimize nutrient losses to the environment. Take additional care to avoid the movement of manure into streams from erosion, surface and tile runoff. Contamination of the environment is prohibited under the Environmental Protection Act, the Ontario Water Resources Act, and the federal Fisheries Act. In addition, there are specific requirements for manure application under the Nutrient Management Act and Regulation 267/03. See the most recent updates of the regulation, or contact an OMAFRA Nutrient Management Specialist, for more details.
Application to fields with steep slopes or impermeable soils can cause
manure runoff when application rates are too high. For some soil types,
several applications at lower rates may be necessary. Spreading manure
in the winter and early spring is not recommended because of the potential
for runoff to surface water and nutrient accumulations in water-ponded
areas. Although winter application should not be part of a nutrient management
plan, there are some mild spells where field application accompanied by
immediate incorporation is possible. In years when winter spreading may
be necessary, take care to select fields with the lowest risk of runoff
to surface water.
1 bushel = 1.25 cubic feet
Rain can cause organic nitrogen to wash into streams if manure has been
applied to unprotected cropland. Phosphorus attached to soil particles
can be carried to streams by soil erosion. Conservation practices can
reduce the chances of nutrients polluting waterways.
Do not apply manure near watercourses. Runoff potential is influenced
by field slope and soil texture. Flow in tile drains can become contaminated
if manure enters a catchbasin or travels through soil cracks to the tiles.
To minimize the risk of contaminated tile flow, apply at low rates when
the tiles are not running, or lightly till the field before manure application
to break any cracks or worm holes.
Applications of nutrients contained in manure or fertilizer in excess of crop requirements can result in contamination of groundwater, particularly on shallow soils over bedrock, soils with a water table close to the surface or very sandy soils where leaching is a concern. Groundwater contamination can occur by mass flow through cracks and holes to groundwater or through leaching of nitrates through the soil. Contamination can also occur if manure seeps directly into inadequately protected water wells. Manure should not be applied within 15 m (50 ft) of drilled wells, 30 m (100 ft) of dug wells or 100 m (330 ft) from a municipal well (Nutrient Management Regulations).
Large livestock operations on small land bases pose special challenges. To avoid over-application of nutrients, especially on fields near the barn, complete a nutrient management plan. It may be necessary to sign agreements with neighbouring farms to ensure the availability of fields for proper manure spreading.
Detailed information about maximum application rates and setbacks from surface water or water wells can be found in the NMAN software or OMAFRA Publication 818, Nutrient Management Workbook, available at www.ontario.ca/crops.
The nitrogen cycle, with its many forms of nitrogen, is a complicated process that is influenced by many factors including weather, soil and physical, chemical and biological processes. Use the optimum amount of nitrogen, keeping in perspective that any nitrogen not used has the potential to leach below the root zone, volatilize into the atmosphere or denitrify (potentially to nitrous oxide - a greenhouse gas).
Nitrate that could potentially leach out of the rooting zone includes nitrogen that is applied in excess of crop removal and nitrogen from manure or biosolids applied during the non-growing season (late summer or fall). In Ontario, most of the drainage to groundwater occurs during the late fall to early spring period, when precipitation exceeds evaporation. On sandy, well-drained soils, much of the nitrate present in the fall could be leached into groundwater if drainage occurs. On heavier soils, more of the loss will be through denitrification. Minimizing the amount of soil nitrate present in the fall will reduce both types of loss.
Management practices to reduce the risk of nitrate losses include:
The risk of surface water contamination by phosphorus may be increased at higher soil test phosphorus levels. However, since phosphorus binds tightly to soil particles, the movement of soil from a field by erosion is also a major factor in determining the risk of surface-water contamination. Because of this, the risk of surface-water contamination by phosphorus cannot be based on a soil-test phosphorus level alone.
The risk of phosphorus contamination to surface water increases when soil test results indicate that no additional phosphorus is required to achieve maximum economic yield, but manure nutrients will still be applied. Phosphorus in surface-water sources increases eutrophication or aquatic plant growth, which leads to oxygen fluctuations and decreased ability for the water source to support aquatic life. To address the environmental risk of additional phosphorus application when soil test levels are adequate, a phosphorus index has been developed. The phosphorus index results in wider phosphorus-free buffers adjacent to water courses when there is a significant risk of nutrient/soil runoff and when phosphorus fertility levels are also high.
The phosphorus index considers:
For more information on phosphorus risk assessment, see the OMAFRA Factsheet,
Determining The Phosphorus
Index for a Field, Order No. 05-067, Publication
818, Nutrient Management Workbook, the
NMAN software, or visit the website at www.ontario.ca/crops.
Biosolids are nutrient-rich, processed organic materials derived from municipal wastewater treatment processes. They usually contain mineral and organic nitrogen, phosphorus, potash, organic matter and micronutrients such as zinc, magnesium and copper. The use of biosolids as part of a farm nutrient management package can reduce the demand for commercial fertilizers, improve soil fertility and enhance soil structure, moisture retention and permeability. Biosolids are ideal for crops such as corn, soybeans, cereals and forage crops.
Residuals include pulp-and-paper-mill fibre residuals, grain processing by-products and many other organic-based wastes, as well as some inorganic materials such as lime rejects from the sugar-processing industry. Each type of waste has unique characteristics that have the potential to benefit soil quality and/or crop production. Some may have limitations, e.g., sewage biosolids are very low in potassium. Be informed about the nutrient content, availability and possible negative impacts of biosolids and residuals use.
Biosolids and residuals land application is regulated under Part V of the Environmental Protection Act. The use of biosolids and residuals on agricultural land is regulated by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. The Guidelines for the Utilization of Biosolids and Other Wastes on Agricultural Land, March 1996, sets out the guidelines related to biosolids and residuals quality, the application site criteria and the application of these materials on agricultural land. A Certificate of Approval is required before land application of any regulated waste material can occur. When properly used, biosolids and residuals can provide a valuable supplementation to a farm nutrient management program.
| Phosphate Materials | Form | % Phosphate (P2O5) |
Salt Index1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single superphosphate |
dry
|
20
|
2.0
|
| Triple superphosphate |
dry
|
44 to 46
|
1.1
|
| Monoammonium phosphate |
dry
|
48 to 52
|
2.0
|
| Diammonium phosphate (18-46-0) |
dry
|
46
|
2.3
|
| Ammonium polyphosphate (10-34-0) |
liquid
|
34
|
2.3
|
| Potash Materials | Form | % Potash (K2O) |
Salt Index1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muriate of ptoash |
dry
|
60 to 62
|
9.7
|
| Sulfate of potash |
dry
|
50
|
4.3
|
| Sulfate of potash magnesia (11% Mg) |
dry
|
22
|
9.9
|
| Potassium nitrate (13-0-44) |
dry
|
44
|
6.1
|
1 Expressed per unit (100 lb) of nutrient.
2 Liquid under pressure.
For more information:
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's
Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: