In This Section

Soybeans: Tillage Options

Author: OMAFRA Staff
Creation Date: 01 March 2002
Last Reviewed: 01 March 2002
Agronomy Guide > Pub 811: Soybeans > Tillage Options
Excerpt from Agronomy Guide for Field Crops (Chapter 4)
Order OMAFRA Publication 811: Agronomy Guide for Field Crops

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Tillage Options
  3. Winter Wheat Following Soybeans
  4. Updates on Soybeans:Tillage Options
  5. Related links...

Introduction

Soybean acreage in Ontario has doubled in the past 10 years to over 809,000 ha (2 million ac). This represents more than a 2,000% increase over the past 50 years. The development of earlier maturity varieties, a wider selection of herbicides, improved yield stability, adaptability to no-till production and the relative low cost of production have contributed to this increase.

Expansion in the demand for specialty soybeans with identity preservation (e.g., food-grade, non-GMO, organic, etc.) has created new marketing opportunities for Ontario beyond the traditional end use of soybeans for oil production (i.e., crush) and livestock feed.

Tillage Options

The wide adaptation of soybeans to various tillage systems, particularly no-till, has contributed to rapid expansion in soybean acreage. Approximately 40% of the soybean crop is no-tilled, and 30% is planted with reduced tillage. Field experience and research trials have shown nearly identical yields between tillage systems. Management of the tillage system used is as important as the actual system selected.

| Top of Page |

No-Till and Minimum Tillage

Ontario tillage research from 1997 to 2000 found that no-till soybean yields equalled the fall moldboard plow in twin rows and row widths 56 cm (22.5 in.) or less (see Table 4-1, Soybean Yield Response Under Various Tillage Systems). Although the yields are similar between the two tillage systems, no-till input costs are often lower and profit higher. Where single 76-cm (30-in.) rows were used, moldboard plowing produced the highest yields. When soybeans are planted in twin rows, soybean yields improve over 76-cm (30-in.) rows for all tillage systems. In this study, zone tillage has shown no significant yield improvement over no-till. Twin rows should be used in the spring zone-till system.

Table 4-1. Soybean Yield Response Under Various Tillage Systems1
Tillage Row Width cm (in.)
Single
76 cm
(30 in.)
Twin
76 cm
(30 in.)
56 cm
(22.5 in.)
38 cm
(15 in.)
19 cm
(7.5 in.)
Soybean Yields t/ha (bu/ac)
No-till 2.72
(40.4)
3.04
(45.3)
2.93
(45.5)
3.06
(45.5)
3.06
(45.5)
Fall moldboard 2.94
(43.8)
3.02
(44.9)
2.93
(43.6)
3.12
(46.4)
3.21
(47.7)
Fall zone-till 2.78
(41.3)
2.93
(43.6)
N/A N/A N/A
Spring zone-till 2.71
(40.3)
3.02
(45.0)
N/A N/A N/A

Least Significant Difference (P = 0.05) = 2.42

1Average of nine sites per year. University of Guelph (1998-2000). Trials were conducted on clay loam, silty-clay loam, silt loam and Guelph loam soil types. Spring zone-tillage conducted approximately 1 day prior to planting.
2Where the difference between two treatments exceeds 2.4, there is a less than 1 in 20 chance that it is due to random variation.

The greatest challenge in the adoption of minimum/no-till tillage is on heavy texture (clay, silty clay loam or silty clay) soil types. In some years, growers have reported reduced no-till soybean yields on these soil types compared to conventional tillage. Long-term tillage system research on Brookston clay soil at Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, resulted in equal soybean yields for no-till and fall moldboard tillage (see Table 4-2, Soybean Yields for Ridgetown College 1992-2000).

| Top of Page |

Table 4-2. Soybean Yields for Ridgetown College 1992-2000
Tillage Treatment Average Yield (excluding 1996)
t/ha bu/ac
Fall moldboard plow 3.21 a 47.7 a
Fall chisel plow 3.05 b 45.4 b
Ridge tillage 2.96 b 44.1 b
Zone tillage 3.06 b 45.5 b
No-till 3.21 b 47.8 a
LSD (0.05) 2.2 2.2

Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level.

When soybeans follow a cereal crop, special attention must be paid to the management of cereal residue beginning at harvest to avoid problems with soybean establishment. The best action is to remove the straw and spread the chaff evenly. In research trials done by University of Guelph, removal of wheat straw improved seedbed conditions, stand establishment, growth and yield for no-till soybeans (see Table 4-3, Effect of Tillage and Wheat Residue Management on Soybean Yields). Cereal residue can form a mat that slows soil warming and drying in the spring. This can delay soybean planting, reduce soybean emergence and early growth, and lead to increased pressure from slugs. Minimum tillage in the fall or spring without the need for secondary tillage improves seedbed conditions and creates looser, finer soil to improve early soybean growth, while maintaining adequate residue to reduce erosion.

Tillage is best avoided along highly erodable knolls and slopes. In these situations, it may be prudent to use tillage only where the soil routinely remains cooler or wetter in the spring.

| Top of Page |

Table 4-3. Effect of Tillage and Wheat Residue Management on Soybean Yields
Tillage (& Straw Management) Soybean Yield
t/ha bu/ac
Fall moldboard/straw baled 3.29 48.9
Fall chisel/straw baled 3.30 49.1
Fall disk/straw baled 3.21 47.8
Fall zone-till/straw baled 3.19 47.5
No-till/all straw and stubble remain 2.27 33.8
No-till/straw baled but stubble remains 3.00 44.7
No-till/straw baled and stubble removed 3.28 48.8

Average 1994-96, Centralia & Wyoming

Note: Stubble heights were approximately 20-30 cm (10-12 in.) except for plots where stubble was cut and removed. Soil types: Centralia: loam, clay loam. Wyoming: silty clay, silty clay-loam. Soybeans were seeded with JD 700 conservation planter equipped with a single 1.25 in. coulter. No-till planter was equipped with tine row cleaners.

Source: T. Vyn, G. Opuku and C. Swanton, University of Guelph

| Top of Page |

Crop Rotation Considerations

Soybeans are very responsive to crop rotation. Table 4-4, Soybean Yield Response Under Various Crop Rotations, presents the results of rotation studies conducted at Ridgetown College, University of Guelph. A rotation of soybeans, winter wheat and corn provided the greatest yield response. The continuous soybean rotation had the lowest yield. A short rotation leads to a build-up of disease and other long-term problems. Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) populations can increase rapidly, further reducing yields (see Soybean Cyst Nematode). To reduce the incidence of white mould, maintain a 3-4 year rotation with other non-host crops. In fields with a history of Phytophthora root rot, a short rotation contributes to an increase in severity and number of races of the disease. The repeated use of Group 2 Herbicides-ALS inhibitors will encourage the spread of Group 2-resistant weeds.

Table 4-4. Soybean Yield Response Under Various Crop Rotations
Crop Rotation Soybean Yield
t/ha bu/ac
Continuous soybeans 2.89 43
Corn, soybeans 3.09 46
Winter wheat, soybeans 3.23 48
Winter wheat, corn, soybeans 3.23 48

Ridgetown College/University of Guelph, 1997-2000.

| Top of Page |

Winter Wheat Following Soybeans

If winter wheat is to be grown following soybeans:

  • Select a variety that requires about 100-200 heat units less than the number available in your area. Research from Ridgetown College, University of Guelph (1990-99), indicated that a variety requiring 100 CHUs less than a full-season variety advanced the maturity by an average of 5 days (range: 3-7 days). Going a further 100 CHUs less advanced the maturity 9 days compared to full-season varieties (see Table 4-5, Soybean Maturity Dates for 2950, 3050 and 3150 Heat Unit Varieties).
  • Plant the soybean crop early, as late planting will delay wheat planting.
  • The wheat planting date can be calculated using the soybean planting date and the days to maturity of the soybean variety.
  • Select a full-season soybean variety if broadcasting the winter wheat into a standing crop.
  • Refer to winter wheat planting dates in the section Planting Dates.

For more information on soybean crop rotations and precautions under different tillage systems, refer to the section Crop Rotation.

Table 4-5. Soybean Maturity Dates for 2950, 3050 and 3150 Heat Unit Varieties1
Soybean Maturity Dates2
Year Planting Date 2950 Heat Unit Varity 3050 Heat Unit Variety 3150 Heat Unit Variety
1990 May 28 Sept. 20 Sept. 25 Sept. 30
1991 May 11 Sept. 8 Sept. 13 Sept. 20
1992 May 15 Sept. 25 Sept. 27 Oct. 2
1993 May 20 Sept. 21 Sept. 26 Oct. 1
1994 May 27 Sept. 14 Sept. 16 Sept. 21
1995 May 23 Sept. 16 Sept. 18 Sept. 21
1997 May 23 Sept. 17 Sept. 21 Sept. 27
1998 May 21 Sept. 14 Sept. 17 Sept. 23
1999 May 12 Sept. 10 Sept. 13 Sept. 19

Source: Ablett, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph.

1For 1990-99.
2These dates are for physiological maturity. Combining would be 3-10 days after these dates.

| Top of Page |

Updates on Soybeans: Tillage Options

No updates available at this time.

| Top of Page |

Related links...

| Top of Page |

For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca