Publication 360, Fruit Production
Recommendations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pub
360, Fruit Production Recommendations > Chapter
6: Grapes > Table 6-5. Relative Susceptibility of Grape Cultivars
to Diseases
|
Table
of ContentsTable 6-5. Relative Disease Susceptibilities, provides a relative rating of grape variety susceptibility based on observations in Ontario and northeast United States under average conditions. Under adverse weather conditions, such as extended cool weather, any given variety may be more seriously affected.
| Eutypa dead arm | Phomopsis cane blight | Black rotb | Downy mildew | Powdery mildew | Botrytis bunch rot | Phytotoxic chemical sensitivityc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auxerrois | - | ++ |
-
|
+
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| Cabernet Franc | - | ++ |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+
|
|
| Cab. Sauvignon | ++ | ++ |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+
|
|
| Chardonnay | + | ++ |
+++
|
+++
|
++++
|
+++
|
3
|
| Gamay | + | + |
++
|
++
|
+++
|
++
|
|
| Gewurztraminer | ++ | - |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| Merlot | - | + |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
++
|
5
|
| Pinot Blanc | - | - |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| Pinot Gris | - | - |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| Pinot Noir | - | - |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| Riesling | + | + |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| Sauvignon Blanc | - | - |
++
|
++
|
++
|
+++
|
|
| Zweigeltrebe | - | ++ |
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
+
|
|
Note: Vinifera varieties not listed are considered susceptible to powdery
mildew, downy mildew and black rot.
Susceptibility rating:
- unknown
+ slight
++ moderate
+++ high
++++ extreme.
b - Black rot is more serious adjacent to bush or similar
areas with poor air drainage.
c - Sensitive to:
1 = Sulphur
2 = Dikar + Zolone combination
3 = Dikar
4 = Thiodan/Thionex
5 = Copper
6 = Flint and Pristine
These notes are based on grower experience and could vary under stress conditions. No entry in this column indicates that no chemical sensitivity has been observed.
| Eutypa dead arm | Phomopsis cane blight | Black rotb | Downy mildew | Powdery mildew | Botrytis bunch rot | Phytotoxic chemical sensitivityc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baco Noir | - | ++ |
+
|
+
|
++
|
+++
|
4
|
| Chambourcin | - | + |
++
|
++
|
++
|
+
|
1, 4
|
| De Chaunac | + | +++ |
+
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
1
|
| Frontenac* | ? | + |
++
|
+
|
+++
|
+
|
|
| Marechal Foch | ++ | ++ |
+
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
1, 2, 3
|
| Seyval Blanc | - | ++ |
++
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
|
| S.V. 23-512 | - | + |
-
|
-
|
++
|
-
|
|
| Vidal 256 | - | + |
+
|
++
|
++
|
+
|
5
|
* denotes American Hybrid, all the rest are French Hybrids
Susceptibility rating:
- unknown
+ slight
++ moderate
+++ high
++++ extreme.
b - Black rot is more serious adjacent to bush or similar
areas with poor air drainage.
c - Sensitive to:
1 = Sulphur
2 = Dikar + Zolone combination
3 = Dikar
4 = Thiodan/Thionex
5 = Copper
6 = Flint and Pristine
These notes are based on grower experience and could vary under stress conditions. No entry in this column indicates that no chemical sensitivity has been observed.
| Eutypa dead arm | Phomopsis cane blight | Black rotb | Downy mildew | Powdery mildew | Botrytis bunch rot | Phytotoxic chemical sensitivityc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concord | + | ++ |
++
|
++
|
++
|
+
|
1, 4, 5, 6
|
| Elvira | +++ | +++ |
++
|
+
|
++
|
++
|
5
|
| Fredonia | + | ++ |
++
|
+++
|
++
|
+
|
|
| Himrod* | - | + |
++
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
|
| N.Y. Muscat | + | - |
+
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
2
|
| Niagara | ++ | ++ |
+++
|
+++
|
++
|
+
|
5
|
| Sov. Coronation | - | + |
-
|
++
|
+++
|
-
|
|
* denotes American Hybrid, all the rest are Labrusca type.
Susceptibility rating:
- unknown
+ slight
++ moderate
+++ high
++++ extreme.
b - Black rot is more serious adjacent to bush or similar
areas with poor air drainage.
c - Sensitive to:
1 = Sulphur
2 = Dikar + Zolone combination
3 = Dikar
4 = Thiodan/Thionex
5 = Copper
6 = Flint and Pristine
These notes are based on grower experience and could vary under stress conditions. No entry in this column indicates that no chemical sensitivity has been observed.
| Author: | OMAFRA Staff |
|---|---|
| Creation Date: | 23 July 2007 |
| Last Reviewed: | 09 August 2010 |