Controlling
Whiteflies On Poinsettias
| Author: |
Graeme Murphy -
Greenhouse Floriculture IPM Specialist/OMAFRA; AnnMarie Cooper
- Plant Products Co. Ltd.; Mike Short - EcoHabitat AgriServices
|
| Creation Date: |
01 January
2006
|
| Last Reviewed: |
01 January
2006
|
Table of Contents
The trouble that many growers have had in controlling whitefly on
their poinsettias in recent years, coupled with concerns about the
newly arrived "Q-biotype" of sweetpotato whitefly, have
led to increased interest in biological control. This interest has
been further piqued by the recent availability of a new biocontrol
agent, Eretmocerus mundus which is specific to Bemisia
whiteflies (i.e. silverleaf/sweetpotato whiteflies).
A collaborative project was set up with 3 commercial growers all
of whom were interested in using biocontrol. As an added twist, trap
plants (plants known to be attractive to whiteflies) were used at
a rate of one per 1000ft2 with the purpose of attracting the whiteflies
so that larger populations would establish on them than on the poinsettias.
The idea was that the biocontrol agents would then be released onto
the trap plants, creating a rearing system for the biocontrols within
the greenhouse.
| Top of Page |
The 3 growers we'll call A, B and C
- Grower A had about 150,000 ft2 of poinsettias. The trap plants
used were primarily eggplants and tomato plants (side by side),
although there were some others used as well such as zucchini, okra
and sweet potato. Cuttings were purchased unrooted and biocontrol
agents were introduced after the cuttings had been on the rooting
bench for about 2 weeks.
- Grower B had 15,000 ft2 of finished crop. Trap plants were only
tomato. The poinsettia plants were purchased as rooted cuttings
and biocontrols introduced after all the plants were potted up.
- Grower C grew 100,000 ft2 of finished crop. He purchased unrooted
cuttings and began introductions when the plants were removed from
the rooting benches and had been placed in the greenhouse. The trap
plants used were eggplant and tomato plants side by side for comparison
(Figure 1).

Figure 1. Tomato and
eggplant used as trap plants in poinsettia
All 3 growers used Eretmocerus mundus for the silverleaf
whitefly, but also Encarsia formosa for any greenhouse whitefly
that may have been present. Greenhouse whitefly does not usually come
in on poinsettia cuttings, but is often already present in the greenhouse
on weeds or other plant material.
| Top of Page |
Results - The poinsettias
The following graphs show the sticky card weekly whitefly counts
for all 3 growers and the percentage of poinsettia plants each week
that were found to have whitefly present (very rarely was there more
than 1-2 whiteflies found per plant).
The main point of interest for Grower A is the spike in whitefly
numbers on the sticky cards at week 37. Normally, these sorts of numbers
would result in the biocontrol program being terminated. What kept
us from abandoning ship was that despite the sticky card numbers and
the fact that adults were becoming easier to find on the plants, we
found very little evidence of reproduction. No egg-laying, no sign
of immature whiteflies. From week 37 onwards, we were able to breathe
a lot more easily as the adult numbers declined and there was still
no sign of whitefly eggs, larvae or pupae on the poinsettias. This
crop was shipped without any whitefly problems.

Text
equivalent of graph
| Top of Page |
Grower B purchased 2 varieties of poinsettia that from the outset
were infested with whiteflies. The biocontrol agents did not give
effective control early on, but there was some suggestion that the
cuttings were treated with pesticides on the rooting bench before
the grower received them. If this was the case, then the lack of parasitism
makes sense. The case for pesticide residues being the culprit is
supported by the fact that a few weeks after the trial was stopped
and pesticides were used to control the whitefly, we actually started
to see significant numbers (up to 50% ) of parasitized whitefly (the
parasitism would have taken place before the pesticides were used
and the wasps were then protected inside the whitefly nymph.). As
the initial pesticide residues declined to levels that were not toxic
to the Eretmocerus, we started to see parasitism taking place.
If this is the case, it emphasizes how whitefly management by propagators
can affect the biocontrol program in the end crop.

Text
equivalent of graph
| Top of Page |
Grower C seemed to be following the same trend as Grower A with increasing
numbers of adults being seen, but initially without significant reproduction.
However, at about week 40, it started to become obvious that there
was colonization taking place with increasing numbers of immatures
starting to be seen. The biggest difference in this crop, compared
to the other growers was a lower introduction rate, about one third
that of the other two growers. The pesticide history of the cuttings
is also unknown, but may have played a role in the lack of success.
Both these factors will be taken into account in developing a program
for next year's crop.

Text
equivalent of graph
| Top of Page |
Results - Trap Plants
The trap plants gave mixed results. The zucchini, okra and sweet
potato used by Grower A were only occasionally found infested by whiteflies
and were used sparingly. Figure 3 shows the percentage of eggplants
and tomatoes found to be infested with whiteflies compared to the
poinsettia crop. Eggplant was by far the most attractive of the three
and it would appear from the graph, that it shows great promise. The
problem however, is that the same trend was seen on these plants as
on the poinsettias. Adults were commonly found, but very little reproduction
and colonization, which meant that the biocontrols were not able to
build up on the trap plants either. However, as a monitoring tool
and a release point for biocontrols they were very useful. Similar
observations were made at Grower C.
The tomato trap plants used by Grower B worked very successfully
with greenhouse whitefly. There was good establishment on the plants
and the Encarsia established well on the whitefly colonies. However,
they were ineffective in attracting large populations of silverleaf
whitefly. Very few adults were found and no reproduction or establishment.
Infested trap plants in Greenhouse A showing the higher
numbers caught on eggplant compared to poinsettia and tomato.

Text
equivalent of graph
| Top of Page |
Costs
For Greenhouses A and B, the cost for the biocontrols was between
$0.10 - 0.11 per pot. Greenhouse B had some extra pesticide costs
after the biocontrols were stopped, but probably less than $0.01/pot.
For Greenhouse C, the cost for biocontrol agents was a little more
than $0.03/pot, reflecting the lower introduction rates. Both Grower
A and B felt that $0.10/pot was a reasonable cost for whitefly control
if consistent, successful results could be obtained. For Grower A,
this was lower than the pesticide costs for whitefly control the previous
year, and with much better control achieved.
Other issues
Using eggplants as a trap plant in poinsettias has other challenges
apart from whether or not it actually works as planned.
- The planting or purchase of the plants has to be scheduled so
that they arrive as young plants at the same time as the poinsettia
cuttings.
- The plants have to be managed somewhat differently from the poinsettias.
Water requirements will be different. Obviously the height of the
plants is very different compared to the poinsettias. The 3 growers
in this trial treated their trap plants differently. One used growth
regulators to keep the plants at a manageable height. This had the
effect of hardening the growth, possibly making it less attractive
as a whitefly egg-laying site. Another grower pinched off the top
growth to control height. This worked well, but made the plant bushier,
creating potential problems with the surrounding poinsettias. Also,
by removing the new growth which is favoured by the whiteflies for
egg-laying, it may have had a negative effect on the establishment
of whitefly colonies on the trap plants. Grower B who used tomato
plants only, grew them using the same technique as a commercial
tomato grower, supported by polypropylene twine. Although the tomato
plants were not effective in attracting Bemisia whiteflies, there
were considerable numbers of greenhouse whiteflies reproducing on
the plants.
- Perhaps the issue of most importance is that eggplant works as
a trap plant for more than just whitefly. Thrips, mites, aphids
all seem to have selected eggplant as one of their favourites and
it is almost inevitable that they will find their way onto the trap
plants at some stage during the poinsettia crop. As long as you
are aware of this, it is not as big a problem as it might seem.
Preventitive releases of biocontrol agents against these other pests
keep them well under control and the cost is minimal. It is critical
however, that these releases be done.
| Top of Page |
So, what was the final analysis of the trials? For one grower, the
results exceeded his expectations and he shipped out one of his cleanest
ever crops. The other two growers, despite not maintaining biocontrol
through to the end were reasonably satisfied with the end result,
and were able to successfully clean up with pesticides over the last
month of the crop. Both have indicated that they are willing to try
the strategy again next year.
And what did we learn?
- We need to pay more attention to introduction rates and ensure
that adequate numbers are released as soon as possible
- Eggplant was the most attractive trap plant used. However, we
now need to better understand what is happening with whitefly reproduction
on these plants
- Pesticide residues are likely to play an important role in the
effectiveness of biocontrol in poinsettia. Growers should be talking
to propagators to better understand the pesticide history of the
cuttings they buy.
- Biocontrol programs in poinsettia stock plant crops may result
in cuttings that will allow for more effective biocontrol in the
finished crop.
| Top of Page |
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|