In This Section |
Sow-Thistle,
Perennial
|
| Author: | Mike Cowbrough - Weed Management (Field Crops) Program Lead/OMAF |
|---|---|
| Creation Date: | 15 April 2005 |
| Last Reviewed: | 15 April 2005 |
Return to Problem Weed Index Page
A member of the composite or aster family and a very come weed in many of the field crops in Ontario. Perennial sow-thistle was one of the first weeds added to the Noxious Weed List under the Ontario Weed Control Act.
Perennial , reproducing by seed and from buds on the widely spreading underground root system.
Spiny annual, annual and perennial sow-thistle are often confused
with one another. Perennial sow-thistle can be differentiated from
sow-thistle as it will be the first to emerge in the spring and will
have an extensive underground root system. The leaves of perennial
sowthistle are also not as deeply lobed as annual sow-thistle. Spiny
annual sow-thistle can be differentiated from annual sow-thistle by
its dark green leaves with purplish margins. The leaves of spiny annual
sow-thistle also look and feel extremely waxy. Spiny annual sow-thistle
is also more "spiny" or "prickly" to the touch
versus annual sow-thistle. Lastly, spiny annual sow-thistle has leaves
which have rounded basal lobes that clasp around the stem..
Perennial Sow-thistle Pictures
Each thumbnail image links to a larger image
| Top of Page |
Glyphosate applied in the fall to perennial sow-thistle should offer the most effective long term control of this species provided a high enough rate is used and one does not become complacent with respect to yearly management of this weed. Pre-plant glyphosate applications in the spring can also be effective at providing in-season control, provided that the majority of perennial sow-thistle has emerged at the time of application. In general a glyphosate rate of 2 L/ac should provide good control of perennial sow-thistle.
A number of post-emergent broadleaf and "one pass" herbicides should provide supression/control of perennial sow-thistle in field corn (Tables 1 and 2).
| Active Ingredient | Trade Name (application timing) |
% Control
|
|---|---|---|
| dicamba/atrazine | MARKSMAN (post -high rate) |
94
|
| atrazine + superior oil concentrate | numerous products exists (post) |
92
|
| dicamba | BANVEL II (post - high rate) |
83
|
| prosulfuron/dicamba | PEAKPLUS (post) |
83
|
| diflufenzopyr/dicamba | DISTINCT (post) |
81
|
| bromoxynil + atrazine | PARDNER or KORIL + atrazine (post) |
76
|
| primisulfuron/dicamba | SUMMIT (post) |
71
|
| mesotrione | CALLISTO (post) |
27
|
| Active Ingredient | Trade Name |
% Control
|
|---|---|---|
| nicosulfuron + diflufenzopyr/dicamba | ACCENT TOTAL |
88
|
| formasulfuron + prosulfuron + dicamba | OPTION 35 DF + PEAKPLUS |
80
|
| rimsulfuron + s-metolachlor/benoxacor + dicamba | BATTALION (post) |
75
|
| primisulfuron/dicamba + nicosulfuron | SUMMIT EXTRA |
75
|
| nicosulfuron + prosulfuron + dicamba | ACCENT 1-PASS |
70
|
Dr. Peter Sikkema, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph.
Table 1 is based on a summary of 2 field trials.
Table 2 is based on a summary of 1 field trial.
Rates used in this trial are listed in OMAF Publication 75 - Guide to Weed Control.
Perennial sow-thistle was around the 2 to 8 leaf stage at the time of application.
We want your feedback. Let us know what you have experienced with these or other products, as well as any other effective management strategies.
| Top of Page |
A pre-plant application of glyphosate at 2 L/ac will provide good control of perennial sow-thistle that has emerged at the time of application. However since glyphosate has no "residual" activity, it will not control any secondary flushes of this weed. Therefore in "Roundup Ready" soybeans, a second application of glyphosate will be required to control perennial sow-thistle. If growing conventional soybeans, BASAGRAN FORTE (at the highest rate) offers the most consistent level of perennial sow-thistle control, while other herbicides can provide supression (Table 1). CLASSIC, at times, has provided impressive control of perennial sowthistle. However, results have been inconsistent and on average visual control with CLASSIC has been around only 60% (Table 1).
| Active Ingredient | Trade Name (product rate/acre) |
% Control
|
|---|---|---|
| bentazon | BASAGRAN FORTE |
94
|
| glyphosate | glyphosate (2 L/ac) |
92
|
| thifensulfuron-methyl | PINNACLE |
76
|
| acifluorfen | BLAZER |
75
|
| glyphosate | glyphosate (1 L/ac) |
74
|
| imazethapyr + bentazon | CLEANSWEEP |
73
|
| cloransulam-methyl | FIRSTRATE |
71
|
| imazethapyr | PURSUIT |
70
|
| chlorimuron-ethyl | CLASSIC |
60
|
| fomesafen | REFLEX |
54
|
Dr. Peter Sikkema, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph.
Table 1 is based on a summary of 3 field trials.
Rates used in this trial are listed in OMAF Publication 75 - Guide to Weed Control.
Perennial sow-thistle at the time of application.
We want your feedback. Let us know what you have experienced with these or other products, as well as any other effective management strategies.
| Top of Page |
Refer to Table 8-1 in OMAF Publication 75 - Guide to Weed Control for herbicide ratings on this species.
What has been your experience?
We want your feedback. Let us know what you have experienced with
these or other products, as well as any other effective management
strategies.
| | Return to Problem Weed Index Page | |
| Top of Page | |
For more information:
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: