|
|
Minimizing Weed Control Costs in Field Corn
| Author: |
Mike Cowbrough
- Weed Specialist/OMAFRA
|
| Creation Date: |
15 March
2005
|
| Last Reviewed: |
15 March
2005
|
It is instinctive to want to minimize production costs, especially
in years of low commodity prices. Reducing weed control costs is
possible, but it requires a higher level of management to maintain
weed control and crop yield. Keep in mind that herbicide costs are
relatively small compared to the economic losses that can be caused
by uncontrolled weeds. Simply switching to low cost herbicides will
not work unless the herbicide addresses the spectrum of weeds in a
field, or is combined with other weed control tools, such as timely
tillage.
Before altering your weed management program, ask yourself the following:
- How well do I know the weed infestations in my fields?
- i.e. species, time of emergence, and density
- What programs have I used in the past and have they been successful?
- Am I able to cultivate, or apply herbicides in a timely fashion?
How do I develop a long-term, low cost weed management system?
I have chosen to focus on three low-risk management options that
will aid in the quest for reduced weed control costs. Obviously there
are other opportunities to cut cost (i.e. reduced rates), however
these strategies come with much higher risk.
- Scout fields and identify weed species, density and time of
emergence.
This seems pretty basic, but it is amazing how this information
can provide you with the opportunity to lower weed control costs.
For example, one field at the Woodstock Research Farm has a history
of heavy lambs-quarters and pigweed pressure, with a very
low amount barnyardgrass. Given this weed spectrum, in 2003, field
corn was planted and we targeted the two broadleaf weeds with an
early application of Marksman and then took a wait-and-see approach
with the grasses. In this particular example, this saved us the
price of a post-emergent grass herbicide (about $22/ac). If grasses
had come up later, we still would have had the flexibility to go
in with an appropriate grass herbicide or tillage.
- Pick the most cost-effective weed management program
Lets be honest. Comparing the cost of herbicide programs
is almost impossible because manufacturers will offer numerous rebate
programs based on the quantities of herbicide or seed purchased.
I have attempted to provide you with lists of herbicides in different
price ranges (before program rebates), and some of the pros and
cons associated with each program (refer to Low Cost Herbicide
Programs For Field Corn Strengths and Weaknesses).
Hopefully this provides you with some options that perhaps you havent
considered before.
Several other factors should be considered when selecting a herbicide
program:
- crop safety,
- flexibility in application timing,
- consistency in performance,
- seed costs associated with herbicide (e.g. Roundup Ready Corn)
and
- rebate incentives there not going away, so use them
to your advantage.
- Review past successes and failures.
Attempting to reduce weed control costs may result in some successes
and failures. It is important to learn equally from both. For
example, I have been burned in the past by selecting a low cost
herbicide program that provided great control of the annual weeds,
but unfortunately perennials were present that I did not know of.
This illustrates the importance of scouting and documentation.
Alternatively, there have been fields where I applied the Cadillac
of weed control programs, only to notice that in a small section
were I didnt have the spray boom turned on (I could call this
my untreated check, but Ill be honest - I screwed up!), the
weed spectrum indicated that a lower cost program would have been
as effective as the more expensive one. Bottom Line - know what
you have and tailor a herbicide program accordingly.
| Top of Page |
What about Roundup Ready Corn for reduced weed control
costs?
From an input cost perspective, Roundup Ready corn is very competitive
plus it offers exceptional weed control, crop safety and application
flexibility (Table 1). However, it is important to manage this technology
appropriately in terms of glyphosate resistant weeds or weed shifts.
An overuse of any one herbicide program will eventually result in
weed management challenges. Provided yield is comparable to conventional
hybrids, Roundup Ready corn has a very nice fit in management systems
that have forages or if one is growing IP and conventional
soybeans in a rotation.
Table 1 - Comparing costs of a RR corn system using glyphosate
+ atrazine for weed control versus a conventional system using Converge.
| Input Costs |
37R70 (RR) |
37R71 (Conv.) |
| Additional Seed Costs($/ac) |
8.46 $/ac |
-------------
|
| Herbicide ($/ac) |
15.59 $/ac
glyphosate + atrazine
|
28.00 $/ac
Converge
|
| Application Costs ($/ac) |
9.00 $/ac |
9.00 $/ac |
| TOTAL ($/ac) |
33.05 $/ac |
37.00 $/ac |
| Additional yield (bu.)
needed to cover higher input costs |
0 bu. |
1.49 bu. |
Assumption - new crop corn price at $2.65/bu.
What does the above comparison tell us?
- Seed and Herbicide Costs are cheaper under the Roundup Ready
system (before any program rebates).
- That the conventional system would need to generate 1.49 bu/ac
more than the Roundup Ready corn system to off-set the
additional seed and herbicide costs.
What doesnt the above comparison tell us?
- Whether the above two hybrids yield the same. This is an important
consideration that should be researched before deciding on a seed/herbicide
system. In the above comparison, according to the 2004 Corn Hybrid
Performance Trials corn yields between the two are comparable.
Related Links
| Top of Page |
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|