Are
You Conducting On-Farm Trials On Your Farm This Season?
| Author: |
Ian McDonald - Applied
Research Coordinator/OMAFRA
|
| Creation Date: |
March 2003
|
| Last Reviewed: |
March 2003
|
Scenario
If you conduct on farm trials on your farm, especially with cereals
or solid seeded soybeans, are you getting reliable information from
them? The last thing anybody wants is to do a whole lot of work without
getting anything for it.
Important Information You Should Consider!
If you are putting your inputs for the whole trial area on in the
same directions that your treatments are laid out, you may be creating
problems (not that putting inputs on perpendicular to the crop rows
doesn't pose problems of its own). This is especially true for inputs
that are put
on after the crop has been planted, including fertilizer, fungicide
and weed control but still applies to preplant inputs if there is
overlaps or misses in the application.
Impacts of Wheel Tracks, Spraying Overlaps & Misses
Consider the following diagram of a winter wheat plot layout in a
field. The treatments are 30 feet wide and you have a 25 foot combine
header that you will use to harvest the plots (1 pass down the plot).
If your sprayer has a 60 or 90 foot wide boom, and you spray Folicur
or post herbicides over the plot area, you will only be putting wheel
tracks (A) in every second to third plot. Depending on how
long your plots are, the impact of the lost yield in the wheel track
area could ruin your chance to see the real effect of the treatment
differences you set out to investigate. In addition, if the driver
is not 100% accurate, you can have spray overlaps or misses (B)
that can cause treatment effects due to crop damage or reduced yield
from weeds not controlled in the missed area. All these contribute
to a yield impact in the plots that is not due to the intended treatments
you started out to compare.

Considering the above scenario, the impact on crop yields within
plots due to wheel traffic and overlaps/misses can be significant.
| Top of Page |
So, if you have this potential loss of yield in every 2nd
or 3rd plot, do you think you can see the true treatment
effects if you are comparing tillage systems, starter fertilizer differences,
etc. I think we would be hard pressed to see a 20% difference between
such treatments, but by applying overall plot inputs parallel to the
crop planting and harvesting direction, the tramping alone in some
treatments can be reducing harvestable yield by up to 20%. What differences
do you want to see? Notice that increasing the plot length did not
reduce the impact of the wheel tracks.
Inputs Perpendicular To Treatments
This clearly demonstrates that we have to seriously consider setting
up our on farm trials so that application of whole plot inputs can
be made perpendicular to the direction of our treatments (which are
usually the direction of planting).
Wheel Tracks In Every Plot
If you are comparing treatments in an on-farm trial that need to
be applied after the crop has emerged (ie herbicide treatment comparison),
then you need to ensure that you have wheel tracks down the plot including
the untreated check plot. In this case you run down the plot with
the sprayer turned off. In this way the track tramping effect will
be consistent in every plot. This still requires that the operator
drive straight since weaving down the field can cause a wider tramping
pattern than driving straight. Alternatively, you can have your plot
setup wide enough that the combine can harvest an area within each
plot where no wheel tracks exist.
| Top of Page |
Impact of Wheel Tracks on Plot Results
| Plot width Harvested(ft)
|
Plot Length (ft) |
Acres per Plot(ac) |
Wheel TrackArea |
Impact on Results
(% loss from tracks) |
| 25 |
500 |
.0287 |
0.057 |
-19.86 |
| 25 |
1000 |
0.574 |
0.115 |
-20.03 |
| 25 |
1500 |
0.861 |
0.172 |
-19.98 |
| 25 |
2000 |
1.148 |
0.230 |
20.03 |
1 Wheel track assumes 2 tracks x 2.5ft wide (tire width)
per tract x length of the plot
Setup Plots To Minimize In-Field Variation
This issue of plot setup also applies to inherent in-field variation
such as tile line direction, slope, change in soil type, removal of
old fence bottoms etc. Anything we can do to minimize the variability
in the trial area, or make it so that it impacts all plots equally,
will go along way to allowing the trial to give us reliable and accurate
results.
For more information, refer to OMAFRA Publication 811, "Agronomy
Guide for Field Crops", Chapter 1, or resources on the OMAFRA
Crop Website.
Related Links
| Top of Page |
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|