Quadratic
Plateau Nitrogen Model
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cooperator |
Normal N Rate |
Pre Sidedress N Test |
Quadratic MERN |
Q. Plateau MERN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jack |
170 (150) |
68 |
--- |
--- |
|
Buurma |
170 (150) |
107 |
87 |
36 |
|
McEachren |
170 (150) |
103 |
82 |
--- |
|
Guilbeault |
170 (150) |
90 |
--- |
--- |
|
Annett-Home |
170 (150) |
80 |
87 |
--- |
|
Annett-Augrim |
170 (150) |
30 |
113 |
97 |
|
Seys |
170 (150) |
58 |
134 |
--- |
|
Elgie |
130 (117) |
0 |
--- |
--- |
Summary: The number of plots and participation across the region was excellent. The plots were done well, and most had 2 replications. Unfortunately the weather during the two years of the project was extreme on both ends of the scale. 2000 was very wet and 2001 hot and dry. The valid data sets prove that there are opportunities to reduce the rate of nitrogen in some fields. In 2000 the Seys plot showed a reduction of nitrogen from 180 kg/ha to 110 kg/ha. In 2001 the Annett-Augrim plot indicated a nitrogen reduction from 170 kgN/ha to 100 kgN/ha, and the Buurma plot from 170 kgN/ha to 90 or even 40 kgN/ha (see table above or graphs below). The quadratic plateau may be a good approach to determine the most appropriate rate of nitrogen for a whole field. It does not address variability of nitrogen within a field. This data will be compiled with other nitrogen research in Ontario to further fine tune nitrogen recommendations. With better weather more would have been learned from this project. The region is interested in continuing this project for 2 more years. Returning to some of the same fields from the first 2 years will help to test the MERN's predicted.


| Author: | Adam Hayes - Soil Management Specialist/OMAFRA |
|---|---|
| Creation Date: | February 2002 |
| Last Reviewed: | February 2002 |