Corn
Ear Mould and DON Survey Results for 2008
There are various pathogenic fungi which are responsible for the various
ear moulds in Ontario and some such as Gibberella have the potential to produce
mycotoxins which can have detrimental consequences if feed to livestock. Although
every year is different, there often are fields where ear mould problems do occur
each year. The persistent wet weather in certain parts of the province this summer
in conjunction with other factors such as leaf diseases, insect injury, bird damage,
hail injury, etc could have provided these corn ear rot fungi with the favourable
growing conditions necessary for disease development.
For these reasons,
the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) in conjunction
with the Ontario Corn Producers Association (OCPA) collected 88 corn samples (20
ears per sample) from across the province between October 3 to October 10, 2008
in order to determine visual ear mould and vomitoxin (DON) levels. In previous
years, OMAFRA, the OCPA and the University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus have demonstrated
proactive surveys such as these are effective in predicting potential problems.
Results shown in Table 1 indicate an average, across the province, of 26%
of the ears sampled had some visual ear mould. All samples were dried, shelled
and the grain when tested resulted in an average DON concentration of 1.1 ppm
and 85% of the samples were below the critical 2ppm level. These results are significantly
lower then in 2006 which bodes well for the industry and producers.
As
in previous years, the frequency of finding fields with DON levels above 2ppm
decreases as you go from southwestern to eastern Ontario. Microclimates and hybrid
selection have consistently been important factors in predicting DON and mould
problems and this year is no exception. Areas closer to the north shore of Lake
Erie or Lake St. Clair tended to have the greatest number of fields above 2ppm.
The
survey results reemphasize the importance of hybrid selection and the variability
amongst hybrids. For example, two hybrids grown side-by-side in the same location
could differ by as much as 4ppm. For producers with recurring ear mould problems,
hybrid selection continues to be one of the most important management tools available
to you.
Although this survey is limited in scope the results do provide
optimism for the 2008 corn crop. However, it also indicates there will be potentially
elevated vomitoxin levels in some fields within certain areas of the province
Ontario corn producers, should remain vigilant in examining fields for signs of
ear mould and testing for the presence of mycotoxins. This will allow for the
implementation of grain harvest, storage, marketing and feeding strategies to
minimize negative impacts.
Table 1. Results from the OMAFRA and OCPA 2008 Provincial Corn Ear Mould
Survey (October, 2008) | Region | #
of Samples | % of ears with visual mould | DON
(ppm) | # of samples with DON 0-2 ppm | #
of samples with DON 2-6 ppm | # of samples with DON
> 6 ppm |
Area 1 (Essex, Chatham-Kent,
Lambton, Elgin) | 19 | 40 |
1.8 | 16 | 2 |
1 |
Area 2 (Norfolk,
Oxford, Brant, Niagara, Hamilton) | 12 |
28 | 2.1 | 7 |
5 | 0 |
Area 3 (Middlesex, Huron, Perth. Waterloo, Wellington,
Dufferin) | 37 | 25 |
0.9 | 32 | 5 |
0 |
Area 4 (Durham,
Northumberland) | 6 | 13 |
0.8 | 5 | 1 |
0 |
Area 5 (Glengarry,
Stormont, Dundas, Ottawa) | 14 |
15 | 0.2 | 14 |
0 | 0 |
| Totals/Weighted Averages | 88 |
26% | 1.1 |
74 (84%) | 13 (15%) |
1 (1%) |