Corn Ear Mould and DON Survey
Results for 2008
| Author: |
Greg Stewart - Corn Specialist/OMAFRA; Albert Tenuta - Field Crop
Plant Pathologist/OMAFRA
|
| Creation Date: |
30 October 2008
|
| Last Reviewed: |
30 October 2008
|
There are various pathogenic fungi which are responsible for the various
ear moulds in Ontario and some such as Gibberella have the potential to
produce mycotoxins which can have detrimental consequences if feed to
livestock. Although every year is different, there often are fields where
ear mould problems do occur each year. The persistent wet weather in certain
parts of the province this summer in conjunction with other factors such
as leaf diseases, insect injury, bird damage, hail injury, etc could have
provided these corn ear rot fungi with the favourable growing conditions
necessary for disease development.
For these reasons, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural
Affairs (OMAFRA) in conjunction with the Ontario Corn Producers Association
(OCPA) collected 88 corn samples (20 ears per sample) from across the
province between October 3 to October 10, 2008 in order to determine visual
ear mould and vomitoxin (DON) levels. In previous years, OMAFRA, the OCPA
and the University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus have demonstrated proactive
surveys such as these are effective in predicting potential problems.
Results shown in Table 1 indicate an average, across the province, of
26% of the ears sampled had some visual ear mould. All samples were dried,
shelled and the grain when tested resulted in an average DON concentration
of 1.1 ppm and 85% of the samples were below the critical 2ppm level.
These results are significantly lower then in 2006 which bodes well for
the industry and producers.
As in previous years, the frequency of finding fields with DON levels
above 2ppm decreases as you go from southwestern to eastern Ontario. Microclimates
and hybrid selection have consistently been important factors in predicting
DON and mould problems and this year is no exception. Areas closer to
the north shore of Lake Erie or Lake St. Clair tended to have the greatest
number of fields above 2ppm.
The survey results reemphasize the importance of hybrid selection and
the variability amongst hybrids. For example, two hybrids grown side-by-side
in the same location could differ by as much as 4ppm. For producers with
recurring ear mould problems, hybrid selection continues to be one of
the most important management tools available to you.
Although this survey is limited in scope the results do provide optimism
for the 2008 corn crop. However, it also indicates there will be potentially
elevated vomitoxin levels in some fields within certain areas of the province
Ontario corn producers, should remain vigilant in examining fields for
signs of ear mould and testing for the presence of mycotoxins. This will
allow for the implementation of grain harvest, storage, marketing and
feeding strategies to minimize negative impacts.
Table 1. Results from the OMAFRA and OCPA 2008 Provincial Corn
Ear Mould Survey (October, 2008)
| Region |
# of Samples |
% of ears with visual mould |
DON (ppm) |
# of samples with DON
0-2 ppm |
# of samples with DON
2-6 ppm |
# of samples with DON
> 6 ppm |
Area 1
(Essex,
Chatham-Kent, Lambton, Elgin) |
19
|
40
|
1.8
|
16
|
2
|
1
|
Area 2
(Norfolk,
Oxford, Brant, Niagara,
Hamilton) |
12
|
28
|
2.1
|
7
|
5
|
0
|
Area 3
(Middlesex, Huron, Perth. Waterloo,
Wellington,
Dufferin) |
37
|
25
|
0.9
|
32
|
5
|
0
|
Area 4
(Durham,
Northumberland) |
6
|
13
|
0.8
|
5
|
1
|
0
|
Area 5
(Glengarry,
Stormont,
Dundas,
Ottawa) |
14
|
15
|
0.2
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
| Totals/Weighted Averages |
88
|
26%
|
1.1
|
74 (84%)
|
13 (15%)
|
1 (1%)
|
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|