|
|
2005
Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials
| Author: |
Ontario Cereal Crops
Committee
|
| Creation Date: |
01 September
2005
|
| Last Reviewed: |
01 September
2005
|
Table of Contents
- Table 1 - Ontario Performance Trial; Winter
Wheat 2005; Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for Area
I & II Combined2, OCCC, August, 2005
- Table 2 - Ontario Performance Trial; Winter
Wheat 2005; Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for Area
1, OCCC, August, 2005
- Table 3 - Ontario Performance Trial; Winter
Wheat 2005; Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for Area
II2, OCCC, August, 2005
- Table 4 - Ontario Performance Trial; Winter
Wheat 2004; Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for Area
III2, OCCC, August, 2004 - all Area III trials lost
in 2005
- Table 5 - Ontario Winter Wheat Varietal Characteristics
Based on Data from Across Ontario, 2005, OCCC, August, 2005
Table 1 - Ontario Performance Trial; Winter Wheat
2005; Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for Area I & II
Combined2, OCCC August, 2004.
Variety |
Class3 |
5 year |
4 year |
3 year |
2 year |
1 year |
| sww |
102 |
100 |
99 |
98 |
96 |
| sww |
103 |
102 |
102 |
101 |
99 |
| sww |
104 |
103 |
102 |
100 |
101 |
| sww |
100 |
99 |
99 |
97 |
99 |
| sww |
99 |
97 |
94 |
93 |
95 |
| sww |
101 |
98 |
98 |
98 |
99 |
| sww-a |
|
|
102 |
100 |
99 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
99 |
98 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
102 |
100 |
| sww |
|
|
|
|
99 |
| srw |
102 |
102 |
101 |
101 |
103 |
| srw |
104 |
103 |
101 |
101 |
102 |
| srw |
102 |
100 |
100 |
99 |
97 |
| srw |
98 |
96 |
97 |
96 |
98 |
| srw-a |
|
108 |
107 |
107 |
105 |
| srw |
|
109 |
109 |
109 |
109 |
| srw |
|
102 |
101 |
102 |
103 |
| srw-a |
|
|
113 |
111 |
114 |
| srw |
|
|
98 |
97 |
98 |
| srw |
|
|
|
104 |
106 |
| srw |
|
|
|
111 |
112 |
| srw-a |
|
|
|
|
104 |
| srw |
|
|
|
|
101 |
| hrw |
100 |
98 |
98 |
98 |
94 |
| hrw-a |
98 |
96 |
96 |
94 |
95 |
| hrw-a |
91 |
88 |
89 |
89 |
88 |
| hrw |
97 |
97 |
96 |
96 |
93 |
| hrw |
|
103 |
101 |
99 |
98 |
| hrw-a |
|
101 |
101 |
100 |
102 |
| hrw |
|
98 |
98 |
98 |
97 |
| Mean Yield |
|
6.20 |
6.23 |
6.20 |
6.09 |
6.09 |
| No. of locations |
|
37 |
29 |
22 |
15 |
7 |
1 Indexed for each site and then averaged. Index = 100
x (variety yield/site yield). Values differing by less than 3 within
a column may not represent true differences in yield.
2 AREA I & II Combined = 2900 West of Frontenac County
3 sww = soft white winter, srw = soft red winter, hrw =
hard red winter, a= awned.
4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions
are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years.
5 Entry has been dropped from the 2005/2006 Winter Wheat
Performance Trial.
Table 2 - Ontario Performance Trial;
Winter Wheat 2005; Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for
Area I, OCCC August, 2004.
Variety |
Class3 |
5 year |
4 year |
3 year |
2 year |
1 year |
| sww |
102 |
99 |
98 |
98 |
99 |
| sww |
103 |
101 |
102 |
100 |
100 |
| sww |
104 |
103 |
103 |
101 |
103 |
| sww |
99 |
99 |
98 |
96 |
101 |
| sww |
98 |
97 |
94 |
95 |
98 |
| sww |
101 |
99 |
98 |
99 |
103 |
| sww-a |
|
|
98 |
95 |
93 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
98 |
96 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
96 |
94 |
| sww |
|
|
|
|
100 |
| srw |
102 |
101 |
101 |
101 |
105 |
| srw |
105 |
104 |
103 |
103 |
106 |
| srw |
100 |
99 |
99 |
99 |
97 |
| srw |
97 |
96 |
97 |
96 |
98 |
| srw-a |
|
111 |
111 |
110 |
108 |
| srw |
|
108 |
108 |
109 |
107 |
| srw |
|
101 |
100 |
102 |
104 |
| srw-a |
|
|
114 |
112 |
115 |
| srw |
|
|
96 |
96 |
93 |
| srw |
|
|
|
104 |
103 |
| |
|
|
|
110 |
110 |
| srw-a |
|
|
|
|
100 |
| srw |
|
|
|
|
96 |
| hrw |
101 |
99 |
100 |
100 |
96 |
| hrw-a |
98 |
97 |
97 |
97 |
96 |
| hrw-a |
90 |
87 |
87 |
86 |
86 |
| hrw |
99 |
99 |
99 |
100 |
99 |
| hrw |
|
102 |
102 |
103 |
101 |
| hrw-a |
|
100 |
99 |
100 |
100 |
| hrw |
|
97 |
97 |
97 |
95 |
| Mean Yield |
|
6.30 |
6.40 |
6.63 |
6.31 |
5.62 |
| No. of locations |
|
15 |
12 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
1 Indexed for each site and then averaged. Index = 100
x (variety yield/site yield). Values differing by less than 3 within
a column may not represent true differences in yield.
2 AREA I = 2900 Crop Heat Units or more.
3 sww = soft white winter, srw = soft red winter, hrw =
hard red winter, a= awned.
4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions
are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years.
5 Entry has been dropped from the 2005/2006 Winter Wheat
Performance Trial.
Table 3 - Ontario Performance Trial;
Winter Wheat 2005 - Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for
Area II2, OCCC August, 2005.
Variety |
Class3 |
5 year |
4 year |
3 year |
2 year |
1 year |
| sww |
103 |
101 |
100 |
98 |
93 |
| sww |
104 |
102 |
102 |
102 |
99 |
| sww |
103 |
102 |
102 |
100 |
100 |
| sww |
99 |
96 |
93 |
92 |
94 |
| sww |
100 |
100 |
99 |
98 |
98 |
| sww |
100 |
98 |
98 |
97 |
95 |
| sww-a |
|
|
104 |
103 |
103 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
100 |
98 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
106 |
104 |
| sww |
|
|
|
|
98 |
| srw |
103 |
102 |
101 |
101 |
101 |
| srw |
104 |
102 |
100 |
100 |
99 |
| srw |
103 |
101 |
101 |
99 |
97 |
| srw |
98 |
96 |
96 |
97 |
98 |
| srw-a |
|
106 |
105 |
105 |
103 |
| srw |
|
109 |
109 |
109 |
110 |
| srw |
|
102 |
102 |
102 |
103 |
| srw-a |
|
|
113 |
110 |
114 |
| srw |
|
|
99 |
98 |
101 |
| srw |
|
|
|
105 |
108 |
| srw |
|
|
|
111 |
114 |
| srw-a |
|
|
|
|
106 |
| srw |
|
|
|
|
104 |
| hrw |
100 |
98 |
97 |
97 |
92 |
| hrw-a |
97 |
96 |
95 |
93 |
95 |
| hrw-a |
92 |
89 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
| hrw |
95 |
95 |
94 |
93 |
89 |
| hrw |
|
103 |
100 |
97 |
95 |
| hrw-a |
|
103 |
101 |
101 |
102 |
| hrw |
|
98 |
99 |
100 |
98 |
| Mean Yield |
|
6.13 |
6.12 |
5.90 |
5.95 |
6.45 |
| No. of locations |
|
22 |
17 |
13 |
9 |
4 |
1 Indexed for each site and then averaged. Index = 100
x (variety yield/site yield). Values differing by less than 3 within
a column may not represent true differences in yield.
2 AREA II = West of Frontenac between 2300 and 2900 Crop
Heat Units, Area IV = The Dundalk Plains with less than 2500 heat
units, use Area II data.
3 sww = soft white winter, srw = soft red winter, hrw =
hard red winter, a=awned.
4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions
are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years.
5 Entry has been dropped from the 2005/2006 Winter Wheat
Performance Trial.
2004 DATA6
Table 4 - Ontario Performance
Trial; Winter Wheat 2004;
Cumulative Yield Index1 Summary for Area III2,
OCCC August, 2004.
Variety |
Class3 |
5 year |
4 year |
3 year |
2 year |
1 year |
| sww |
102 |
102 |
101 |
105 |
111 |
| sww |
111 |
112 |
112 |
112 |
115 |
| sww |
106 |
107 |
103 |
103 |
107 |
| sww |
105 |
105 |
108 |
110 |
114 |
| sww |
89 |
89 |
93 |
79 |
66 |
| sww |
102 |
103 |
95 |
94 |
96 |
| sww-a |
|
|
|
|
85 |
| srw |
102 |
103 |
102 |
100 |
101 |
| srw |
|
102 |
104 |
100 |
96 |
| srw |
|
96 |
96 |
90 |
89 |
| srw |
|
101 |
99 |
96 |
95 |
| srw |
|
100 |
96 |
91 |
83 |
| srw-a |
|
|
98 |
95 |
88 |
| srw |
|
|
107 |
112 |
107 |
| srw |
|
|
108 |
108 |
111 |
| srw |
|
|
95 |
95 |
99 |
| srw-a |
|
|
|
113 |
109 |
| srw |
|
|
|
103 |
105 |
| srw |
|
|
|
|
96 |
| hrw |
94 |
95 |
96 |
97 |
104 |
| hrw-a |
93 |
94 |
93 |
94 |
107 |
| hrw-a |
95 |
95 |
91 |
89 |
89 |
| hrw |
|
98 |
98 |
100 |
105 |
| hrw |
|
|
103 |
109 |
109 |
| hrw-a |
|
|
99 |
99 |
95 |
| hrw |
|
|
105 |
109 |
118 |
| Mean Yield |
|
5.96 |
5.94 |
6.59 |
7.22 |
6.76 |
| No. of locations |
|
6 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 Indexed for each site and then averaged. Index = 100
x (variety yield/site yield). Values differing by less than 3 within
a column may not represent true differences in yield.
2 Area III = East of Frontenac between 2500 and 2900 Crop
Heat Units. ** There were no yield data for Area III in 2000.
3 sww=soft white winter, srw=soft red winter, hrw=hard
red winter, a= awned.
4 Cultivar yield rankings may vary from year to year. Decisions
are therefore best made using data with the greatest number of years.
5 Entry has been dropped from the 2004/2005 Winter Wheat
Performance Trial.
6 All Area III trials lost in 2005
Table 5 - Ontario Winter Wheat Varietal Characteristics
Based on Data from Across Ontario 2005, OCCC August, 2005
Variety |
Test Weight
(kg/hl) |
TKW (g) |
Winter
Survival
(%) |
Lodging
(0-9)1 |
Height (cm) |
Heading Date2
|
Powdery Mildew (0-9)1
|
Leaf Rust (0-9)1 |
Septoria (0-9)1 |
Fusarium
Rating4 |
Years
(Fusarium
Data) |
| 74.7 |
39 |
76 |
1.6 |
92 |
158 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
4.1 |
HS |
4 |
| 75.2 |
39 |
81 |
2.5 |
91 |
159 |
2.7 |
1.3 |
3.4 |
S |
4 |
| 76.0 |
38 |
80 |
1.6 |
92 |
157 |
3.2 |
2.3 |
3.9 |
HS |
4 |
| 75.7 |
40 |
78 |
2.8 |
94 |
158 |
3.4 |
4.7 |
3.8 |
MS |
4 |
| 75.9 |
39 |
71 |
1.2 |
78 |
159 |
3.2 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
HS |
4 |
| 74.2 |
38 |
77 |
4.5 |
94 |
160 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
3.8 |
MS |
4 |
| 74.7 |
39 |
80 |
2.9 |
94 |
160 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
3.3 |
MS |
2 |
| 76.8 |
33 |
73 |
1.1 |
78 |
158 |
5.2 |
1.0 |
2.7 |
S |
2 |
| 74.6 |
40 |
81 |
1.8 |
85 |
158 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
4.6 |
HS |
2 |
| 76.7 |
35 |
74 |
2.5 |
86 |
159 |
2.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
MS |
1 |
| 77.0 |
34 |
84 |
4.2 |
88 |
157 |
6.1 |
2.0 |
4.9 |
MR |
4 |
| 75.2 |
38 |
85 |
3.8 |
87 |
158 |
2.9 |
0.7 |
4.0 |
S |
4 |
| 76.5 |
38 |
84 |
2.7 |
90 |
157 |
2.6 |
0.0 |
4.2 |
MS |
4 |
| 78.4 |
37 |
77 |
3.9 |
76 |
157 |
2.2 |
3.0 |
4.6 |
HS |
4 |
| 77.1 |
38 |
79 |
1.1 |
82 |
158 |
3.2 |
4.7 |
2.4 |
S |
4 |
| 77.1 |
32 |
81 |
2.0 |
89 |
157 |
0.2 |
3.0 |
4.3 |
MR |
4 |
| 78.7 |
42 |
83 |
2.8 |
86 |
156 |
2.2 |
0.7 |
4.3 |
MR |
4 |
| 76.7 |
36 |
82 |
1.9 |
80 |
157 |
3.8 |
0.7 |
2.8 |
S |
3 |
| 76.2 |
31 |
80 |
4.0 |
76 |
157 |
1.9 |
5.0 |
4.4 |
S |
3 |
| 80.5 |
35 |
79 |
3.4 |
79 |
156 |
0.4 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
MS |
2 |
| 77.0 |
37 |
83 |
2.5 |
85 |
158 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
3.7 |
MS |
2 |
| 78.0 |
37 |
72 |
1.4 |
82 |
158 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
S |
1 |
| 77.7 |
34 |
81 |
3.4 |
81 |
157 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
4.8 |
MS |
1 |
| 78.2 |
37 |
82 |
1.5 |
103 |
158 |
1.6 |
1.0 |
3.8 |
MR |
4 |
| 80.2 |
42 |
77 |
1.8 |
84 |
158 |
3.9 |
1.0 |
3.9 |
S |
4 |
| 79.0 |
39 |
80 |
0.2 |
99 |
161 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
3.9 |
MR |
4 |
| 79.9 |
37 |
83 |
0.8 |
91 |
159 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
3.6 |
MS |
4 |
| 80.2 |
44 |
78 |
0.9 |
91 |
157 |
3.5 |
0.7 |
3.5 |
S |
4 |
| 79.8 |
47 |
80 |
2.2 |
82 |
157 |
2.6 |
0.3 |
4.4 |
MS |
4 |
| 76.2 |
39 |
84 |
2.5 |
89 |
161 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
S |
4 |
| No. of locations
|
7 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
1 For ratings 0-9, a high score is undesirable.
2 Heading may vary from year to year and should only be
used to indicatie relative differences.
3 Entry has been dropped from the 2005/2006 Winter Wheat
Performance Trial.
4 Fusarium ratings are based on Fusarium head blight ratings
and deoxynivalenol (DON) levels from inoculated provincial trials.
MR=moderately resistant (best); MS=moderately susceptible; S=susceptible;
HS=highly susceptible (worst);
5 Entry has been dropped from the 2005/2006 Winter Wheat
Performance Trial
| Top of Page |
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|