In This Section |
Pest
Management Program for Grape Series:
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
| Agdex#: | 231/634 |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 06/90 |
| Order#: | 90-123 |
| Last Reviewed: | 06/90 |
| History: | |
| Written by: | Kevin W. Ker - former Pest
Management Advisor/OMAFRA; J. Northover - Vineland Research Station/Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada; Todd Leuty - Agroforestry Specialist/OMAFRA |
For more than 60 years the grape industry recognized a disease "dead
arm" of grapes attributed to the fungus Phomopsis viticola (Sacc).
However, in the 1970's the actual dead arm" symptom was shown to
be caused by a second fungus, Eutypa armeniacae (Hansf. & Carter),
and the disease was renamed Eutypa Dieback. The symptoms caused by P.
viticola were established as a separate disease known as Phomopsis Cane
and Leaf Spot The symptoms of these two diseases and the control strategies
are quite different. The biology and control of Eutypa dieback will
be described in another Factsheet.
Phomopsis cane and leaf spot occasionally causes serious economic losses,
especially following unusually wet spring weather. Severe infection
during the early season may result in mechanically weakened shoots that
may break during strong winds, or infected clusters, parts of which
desiccate and break off, or even infected berries that shrivel and shed
before harvest.

Figure 1. Overwintering lesions on cane wood
| Top of Page |
Phomopsis overwinters in lesions, particularly on one-year-old wood infected by the fungus P. viticola the previous season (Figure 1). In early spring, rainfall releases spores from pycnidia on overwintering lesions. Newly released spores are splashed onto developing leaves and shoots, with new lesions appearing quickly on the new growth. The most extensive development of this disease occurs from bud break until shoots are 10 to 15 cm in length. The fungus does not appear to be active during the summer months but may reappear in late summer on leaves at the ends of shoots if cool wet weather occurs (see life cycle diagram).

Figure 2. Susceptible young, green shoots and leaves in early season.

Figure 3. Lesions coalescing on young shhot

Figure 4. Leaf infection by P.viticola and resultant puckering

Figure 5. Numerous infection sites on rachis.
| Top of Page |
Phomopsis can be minimized by the combination of good cultural practices and fungicide treatments. Labrusca (e.g. Niagara), American hybrids (e.g. Dutchess) and French hybrids (e.g. De Chaunac) are more susceptible than the vinifera cultivars to P. viticola, but few cultivars are resistant. Since the fungus spreads short distances mostly within and between neighbouring vines, pruning debris should be removed from the vineyard and burned, or shredded and disked into the vineyard soil.
Chemical protection can usually be achieved with two applications of an effective fungicide. The first spray should be applied when shoots are 1 to 3 cm long and the second when shoots are 10 to 15 cm in length. If cool, wet growing conditions exist, an additional application may be needed. A listing of currently available fungicides is given in OMAFRA Publication 360, Fruit Production Recommendations.
Phomopsis cane and leaf spot occasionally causes serious economic losses, especially following unusually wet spring weather. Severe infection during the early season may result in mechanically weakened shoots that may break during strong winds, or infected clusters, parts of which desiccate and break off, or even infected berries that shrivel and shed before harvest.
| Top of Page |
Click here for text equivalent
Photographs courtesy of N.Y.A.E.S. Geneva, N.Y. and OMAFRA.
Life Cycle of Phomopsis Cane & Leaf Spot of Grapes (Drawing by R.
Sticht, N.Y.A.E.S. Cornell University, Geneva, N.Y.)
| Top of Page |
For more information:
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's
Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: