Guide
to Custom Farmwork and Short-Term Equipment Rental
Table of Contents
Introduction
This
Factsheet provides the following decision-making tools for farm managers and custom
farmwork operators to manage the use of equipment and work time to meet production
and profit goals:
- Survey of Custom Farmwork and Short-Term Equipment
Rental Rates charged in 2009
- Guide to Calculating Custom Farmwork Rates
and Short-Term Equipment Rental Rates
- Factors to Consider in a Custom
Farmwork Agreement
Hiring custom farmwork provides an option for farm
managers to purchase fieldwork and other services instead of owning the equipment
and doing the work. In this Factsheet, a multi-year equipment lease is considered
to give the farm manager the same day-to-day control as ownership. For more information
on multi-year lease agreements, see the OMAFRA Factsheet, Leasing
Farm Equipment, Order No. 09-035.
For equipment owners, providing custom
farmwork services can be the focus of a business, a sideline farming enterprise
that spreads equipment ownership costs over more acres, or a marketing tool to
complement the sale of other farm inputs.
Equipment use options
Option
Own
or lease (long-term) equipment
Advantages
- Equipment and operator
are ready and available when needed, especially for weather-sensitive operations
such as planting, spraying and harvesting. Timeliness of operation impacts directly
on yield, product quality and farm revenue.
- Farm manager has direct control
of operating decisions.
- Farm manager develops and maintains hands-on knowledge
of operation.
- Limited risk of weed transfer or biosecurity concerns.
Disadvantages
- Farm business may not be large enough
to cover the equipment's ownership and operating costs.
- Equipment replacement
rate may not keep pace with new technology.
- The farm may not be able to
supply the labour at the time the operation is required.
- Farmer is required
to master an additional management skill set.
- Farmer is responsible for repairs beyond warranty when owned
or as per lease agreement.
Option
Hire
custom farmwork
Advantages
- Farm manager gains use of newer
and more efficient equipment without full cost of ownership/operating expenses.
- Custom
operator provides expertise gained from a wider experience.
- Custom operator
maintains required regulatory certification.
- Farmer can be busy elsewhere
while custom operator provides service.
- No direct repairs and maintenance
costs.
Disadvantages
- Custom operator may not be available
at the most optimum time, resulting in reduced yield, product quality and revenue.
- Farm manager loses direct control of operation.
- Farm manager
is dependent on the availability of custom operators.
- Increased risk of
weed transfer and other biosecurity concerns.
Option
Rent
equipment, short-term
Advantages
- If equipment is available,
farm manager controls the operation and the timeliness of the work.
- Farm
manager gains the use of equipment without the full cost of ownership and operating
expenses.
- Repairs and maintenance are made as per agreement.
Disadvantages
- Availability of equipment affects timeliness of operation.
- Rental
equipment may not be available due to lack of year-round demand or over demand
during a short season of use.
Survey Of Custom
Farmwork And Short-Term Equipment Rental Rates Charged In 2009
Table 7,
Survey of Custom Farmwork Rates Charged in 2009, shows the results of a survey
of the rates charged in 2009 by 275 Ontario custom farmwork operators. The survey
included:
- full-time custom operators
- farmers providing custom
farmwork as a significant sideline business
- farmers providing limited
custom farmwork to neighbours
- farm input suppliers providing custom
application as a service
The custom rate charged included the equipment,
fuel and operator cost but excluded the cost of material applied
The survey
shows what rates were charged in 2009 across Ontario; use these rates as a guide
in making management decisions. There is no assurance that using the "average"
rates reported here will cover the cost of providing the service. Custom operators
should carefully calculate all costs and returns before setting prices. See Guide
to Calculating Custom Farmwork and Short-Term Equipment Rental Rate Charges.
The
tables show ranges for the rates, as many factors can cause variations in the
rates charged, including:
- the type, size, age of equipment
-
the amount of use (number of acres covered or hours used)
- availability
of the equipment in the local area
- field shape, size and topography
-
soil conditions
- local tradition
Table 8, Survey of Short-Term
Equipment Rental Rates Charged in 2009, on page 16, summarizes two sources of
short-term tractor rental rates. The first source is 20 reports from custom operators.
The second source, used with permission, is taken from Iron Solutions' Eastern
Canada Winter 2009 Official Guide, a survey of tractor rental rates charged by
Eastern Canadian machinery dealers in 2009.
Survey Details
Results
are summarized by province and by six smaller regional areas. Where available,
the 2009 provincial average rates are also listed. (The most recent survey before
the 2009 survey was taken in 2006.)
Average Rates
An average rate
is given when there are at least three reports. The greater the number of reports,
the more the summary reflects the market rates.
What Are Percentiles and
How Can You Use Them?
Percentiles have been used to help show the range
of the rates that were charged. For example, in the Provincial Summary, the 15th
percentile for corn combining with grain buggy is $36/acre and the 85th percentile
is $43/acre. This means that 15% of those surveyed charged $36/acre or less and
15% charged more than $43. Seventy per cent (85th-15th percentile) of all those
reporting charged between $36 and $43/acre. The average rate charged was $40/acre.
Survey
Areas
Area 1 Chatham-Kent,
Elgin, Essex, Lambton, Middlesex
Area
2 Brant, Haldimand, Hamilton, Niagara, Norfolk, Oxford
Area
3 Bruce, Dufferin, Grey, Halton, Huron, Peel, Perth, Simcoe, Waterloo, Wellington
Area 4 Durham, Haliburton,
Hastings, Kawartha Lakes, Muskoka, Northumberland, Parry Sound, Peterborough,
Prince Edward, York
Area
5 Frontenac, Lanark, Leeds-Grenville, Lennox-Addington, Ottawa, Prescott-Russell,
Renfrew, Stormont-Dundas-Glengarry
Area
6 Algoma, Cochrane, Kenora, Manitoulin, Nipissing, Rainy River, Sudbury, Thunder
Bay, Timiskaming

Figure 1. Survey Areas
Guide
To Calculating Custom Farmwork And Short-Term Equipment Rental Rate Charges
Farm
managers who use the equipment in their own operations as well as providing custom
farmwork to others should calculate costs using the total of own farm and custom
acreage and operation hours.
Example calculations are based on market prices
and Tables 6, 7 and 8 of this Factsheet. See the OMAFRA Factsheet Budgeting
Farm Machinery Costs, Order No. 01-075, for additional machinery cost information.
Downloadable spreadsheet versions of the Custom Farmwork Rate Calculator and the
Short-Term Equipment Rental Rate Calculator are available as part of the Farm
Business Decision Calculators section of the Agricultural Business Management
Section of the OMAFRA website: www.ontario.ca/agbusiness.
Table 1. Custom farmwork rate calculator
Power unit (tractor or self-propelled machine) |
|
Annual fixed cost |
| Depreciation
= purchase price - trade-in value ÷ life of machine (years) | |
__________
|
Interest*=
(purchase price + trade-in) ÷ 2 x annual interest rate | |
__________
|
Insurance
& housing = purchase price x 1½% | |
__________
|
| Total |
(A) | __________ |
| Annual operating cost | | |
Fuel & lubricants = (Table 6) (L/hr x hr/yr x fuel
cost/L x 1.15) | |
__________
|
| Repairs = estimate using Table
5 | | __________ |
| Total | (B) |
__________ |
| + Machine
(tillage implement, PTO machine, other) |
| Annual
fixed cost | | |
Depreciation
= purchase price - trade-in value ÷ life of machine (years)
| |
__________
|
Interest* = (purchase
price + trade-in) ÷ 2 x annual interest rate | |
__________
|
Insurance
& housing = purchase price x 1½% | |
__________
|
| Total |
(C) | __________ |
| Annual operating cost | | |
| Repairs = estimate using Table 5 | |
__________ |
| Total |
(D) | __________ |
| = Annual machinery costs (A + B + C + D) |
(E) | |
+ Profit margin (return
to management, admin. costs) (suggest 15% of machinery costs ( E x 0.15 )
| (F) | |
+ Operator labour (self or hired) - (suggest 15%
over machine hr for travel, downtime) # of machinery hr x 1.15 x wage/hr
| (G)
|
__________
|
| =
Total costs (E + F + G) | (H) | |
| = Custom rate H ÷ Total annual acres
or H ÷ Total annual hours |
(I) |
__________ |
| |
per acre or per hour |
| * Interest - Interest calculation is the average annual interest
cost of the investment (yours and/or the lender's) that is tied up in the machine. |
Table 2. Short-term equipment rental rate calculator
| +Machinery costs (from Table
1, Custom Rate Calculator above) |
(E) |
__________ |
| - Total
fuel and lubricant cost (if any) (see Table 1, above) |
(J) |
__________ |
+ Profit
margin (return to management, admin. costs) suggest 15% of machinery costs (E
- J) x 0.15 | (K) |
__________ |
| = Total
costs (E - J + K) | (L) |
__________ |
|
= Rental rate H÷ Total annual
acres or H ÷ Total annual hours |
(M) |
__________ |
| per
acre or per hour |
| Note:
Rental rates may have minimum daily or weekly rates |
Example
1. Custom farmwork rate calculation
The following example calculates a custom
farmwork rate for a combine with corn and soybean heads scheduled to be traded
in 5 years.
VLife (years) = 5
- Purchase price = $240,000
- VTrade
in value = $105,000
- Interest rate = 5.0 %
- Acres/year = 1,600
- Hours
per year = 200
- Fuel cost/L = $0.60
- Corn/soy aver. acres/hr = 8
- Average
fuel used (L/hr) = 40
| Example
1. Custom farmwork rate calculator |
|
Power unit (tractor or self-propelled machine) |
| Annual fixed cost |
| Depreciation = (purchase price - trade-in value) ÷ life
of machine (years) | $27,000 |
| Interest = ((purchase price + trade-in) ÷
2) x annual interest rate | $8,625
|
| Insurance & housing = purchase
price x 1½ % | $3,600 |
| Total fixed costs/yr |
(A) |
$39,225 |
| Annual operating cost |
| Fuel & lubricants (Table 7)= (L/hr x hr/yr x fuel cost/L x 1.15) | |
$5,520 |
| Repairs
= estimate using Table 6 | |
2,000 |
| Total operating
costs/yr | (B) |
$7,520 |
| +
Machine (tillage implement, PTO machine, other) | |
|
| 1. Annual fixed costs |
(C) |
0 |
| 2. Annual operating
costs | (D) |
0 |
| = Annual machinery
costs (A+B+C+D) | (E) |
$46,745 |
+ Profit margin (return to management, admin. costs) (suggest 15% of machinery
costs ( E x 0.15 ) | (F) |
$7,012 |
| + Operator labour
(self or hired) - (suggest 15% over machine hr for travel, downtime) # of machinery
hr x 1.15 x wage/hr | (G) | |
| = Total costs (E+F+G) |
(H) |
$57,667 |
| = Custom rate H÷Total annual acres or H÷Total annual hours |
(I) |
$36.04/acre or $288.32/hr |
* Interest - Interest calculation is the average annual interest cost
of the investment (yours and/or the lender's) that is tied up in the machine.
In this example, if the operator combines 1,600 acres at $36/acre, the
return to management is $7,000 ($4.38/acre or $35/machine hr), and the return
to labour is $3,910 ($2.44/acre or $19.55/machine hr). The custom farmwork operator
also earns a return of 5% interest on the owner's equity in the machinery.
Cash
Flow Considerations
The example above calculates machinery costs and returns
to management, labour and investment. The estimated annual depreciation and interest
costs total $35,625. From a cash flow point of view, the depreciation is not a
draw on the bank line. However, in the case of financing, loan payments are a
cashflow requirement.
Actual loan principal and interest payments will
depend on the amount financed and will be different from the figures in the example.
It is possible to cash flow actual expenses at a lesser rate than the example
but this would come at the cost of lower returns to management, operator labour
and to the owner's equity tied up in the machine.
The capital cost of the
equipment (purchase/trade-in values) and the number of acres worked are the two
largest factors affecting price rate, and therefore have the biggest impact on
profitability.
Table 4 shows how volume of acres affects the per acre costs
in order to receive total returns equal to the 1,600 acres used in the previous
example.
Table 4. Cost per acre
comparison | | 1,200
acres | 1,600 acres | 2,000
acres |
| Machinery fixed costs |
$ 32.70 | $ 24.50 |
$ 19.60 |
| Machine operating
costs | $ 5.00 |
$ 4.60 | $ 4.40 |
| Return to management | $
5.80 | $ 4.40 |
$ 3.50 |
| Return to labour |
$ 2.50 | $ 2.50 |
$ 2.50 |
| Total rate |
$ 46.00 | $ 36.00 |
$ 30.00 |
The following example
calculates a short-term rental rate for the same combine with corn and soybean
heads used in Example 1.
Example
2. Short-Term Equipment Rental Rate Calculation | +
Machinery costs (from Example 1, Custom farmwork rate calculator) |
(E) | $46,745 |
| - Total fuel and lubricant cost (if any) (see Example 1,
Custom farmwork rate calculator) | (J) |
- $ 5,520 |
| + Profit margin
(return to management, admin. costs) suggest 15 % of machinery costs less fuel
and lubricants (E - J) x 0.15 | (K) |
+$ 6,184 |
| = Total costs
(E -J+K) | (L) |
$47,409 |
| = Rental rate
L÷Total annual acres or L÷Total annual hours |
(I) | $29.63/acre
or $237.05/hr |
Note: Rental rates may have minimum daily
or weekly rates
Table 5, Trade-in values as a percent of purchase
cost, and Table 6, Accumulated repair costs as a percent of purchase price, provide
information used in the example calculations.
Table 5. Trade-in values as a percent of new cost | End
of Year | Tractors | |
| <80 hp | 80-149
hp | 150+ hp | Grp
1 | Grp 2 | Grp
3 | Grp 4 | Grp
5 | Grp 6 | Grp
7 |
| 1 |
60 | 68 |
67 | 74 |
49 | 56 |
65 | 47 |
61 | 69 |
| 2 |
54 | 61 |
59 | 62 |
44 | 50 |
60 | 44 |
54 | 62 |
| 3 |
50 | 57 |
54 | 54 |
40 | 46 |
56 | 42 |
49 | 56 |
| 4 |
46 | 53 |
49 | 48 |
37 | 42 |
53 | 40 |
45 | 52 |
| 5 |
43 | 49 |
45 | 43 |
35 | 39 |
50 | 39 |
42 | 48 |
| 6 |
41 | 46 |
42 | 38 |
32 | 37 |
48 | 38 |
39 | 45 |
| 7 |
38 | 44 |
39 | 34 |
30 | 34 |
46 | 36 |
36 | 42 |
| 8 |
36 | 41 |
36 | 31 |
28 | 32 |
44 | 35 |
34 | 40 |
| 9 |
34 | 39 |
34 | 28 |
27 | 30 |
42 | 34 |
31 | 37 |
| 10 |
33 | 37 |
32 | 25 |
25 | 28 |
40 | 33 |
30 | 35 |
| 11 |
31 | 35 |
30 | 23 |
24 | 27 |
39 | 32 |
28 | 33 |
| 12 |
29 | 33 |
28 | 20 |
23 | 25 |
38 | 32 |
26 | 31 |
| 13 |
28 | 32 |
26 | 18 |
21 | 24 |
36 | 31 |
24 | 29 |
| 14 |
27 | 30 |
24 | 17 |
20 | 22 |
35 | 30 |
23 | 28 |
| 15 |
25 | 29 |
23 | 15 |
19 | 21 |
34 | 29 |
22 | 26 |
| 16 |
24 | 28 |
21 | 13 |
18 | 20 |
33 | 29 |
20 | 25 |
| 17 |
23 | 26 |
20 | 12 |
17 | 19 |
32 | 28 |
19 | 24 |
| 18 |
22 | 25 |
19 | 10 |
16 | 18 |
30 | 27 |
18 | 22 |
| 19 |
21 | 24 |
28 | 9 |
16 | 17 |
29 | 27 |
17 | 21 |
| 20 |
20 | 23 |
17 | 8 |
15 | 16 |
29 | 26 |
16 | 20 |
Source: American Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards, American
Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1999
Group 1: Combines, self-propelled
forage harvesters.
Group 2: Swathers, mower-conditioners, rotary hay mowers,
rotary mower-conditioners.
Group 3: Forage harvesters, balers, bale elevators,
tub grinders, augers, grinder-mixers, forage boxes, roller mills.
Group 4:
Planters, drills, sprayers.
Group 5: Moldboard plows, chisel plows, cultivators,
V-rippers.
Group 6: Disks, harrows, hoes.
Group 7: Manure spreaders, miscellaneous
equipment.
Table 6. Accumulated
repair costs as a percent of purchase price | Machine | ¼%
LIFE | ½ % LIFE | ¾
% LIFE | FULL LIFE |
| Accumulated
Hours | Costs (%) | Accumulated
Hours | Costs (%) | Accumulated
Hours | Costs (%) | Accumulated
Hours | Costs (%) |
| 2-wheel tractors |
3,000 | 6.2 |
6,000 | 25.0 |
9,000 | 56.2 |
12,000 | 100 |
| 4 WD and MFWD tractors |
4,000 | 4.8 |
8,000 | 19.2 |
12,000 | 43.2 |
16,000 | 80 |
| Self-propelled combines |
750 | 2.2 |
1,500 | 9.3 |
2,250 | 21.9 |
3,000 | 40 |
| Planters, drills |
375 | 4.1 |
750 | 17.5 |
1,125 | 41.0 |
1,500 | 75 |
| Moldboard plows |
500 | 8.3 |
1,000 | 28.7 |
1,500 | 59.6 |
2,000 | 100 |
| Disk, disk harrows |
500 | 5.5 |
1,000 | 18.0 |
1,500 | 35.9 |
2,000 | 60 |
| Chisel plows |
500 | 10.1 |
1,000 | 26.5 |
1,500 | 46.8 |
2,000 | 75 |
| Cultivators |
500 | 10.2 |
1,000 | 27.0 |
1,500 | 47.6 |
2,000 | 70 |
| Mowers |
500 | 14.2 |
1,000 | 46.2 |
1,500 | 47.7 |
2,000 | 150 |
| Square balers, small |
500 | 6.6 |
1,000 | 23.0 |
1,500 | 43.0 |
3,000 | 80 |
| Square balers, large |
750 | 6.0 |
1,500 | 20.7 |
2,250 | 43.0 |
3,000 | 75 |
| Large round balers |
375 | 7.4 |
750 | 25.9 |
1,125 | 53.6 |
1,500 | 90 |
| SP forage harvesters |
1,000 | 3.1 |
2,000 | 12.5 |
3,000 | 28.1 |
4,000 | 50 |
| Rakes |
625 | 8.6 |
1,250 | 22.7 |
1,875 | 40.1 |
2,500 | 60 |
Source: American Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards, American
Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1999
Example 3. Accumulated Repair Cost Calculation | New
combine cost | $240,000 |
| Projected use | 8,000 acres
or 200 hours per year over 5 years |
| Estimated accumulated repair
costs at 1,000 hours | 4.2% of purchase cost (estimated using Table 6) |
| Repair costs | Approx. $10,000 ($240,000 x 4.2%) over 5 yr for
an average of $2,000/yr |
| Used machinery | When calculating
the depreciation on used machinery, use the actual price paid for the machine
minus its expected trade-in or salvage value, divided by the expected life of
the machine on your farm. Increase repair rates to levels appropriate for the
age or number of hours on the machine. Expect to have higher than normal repair
expenses in the first year of ownership of a used machine as you bring it back
into top operating shape. |
Table 7. Performance, horsepower and fuel requirements of selected farm
equipment | | HP
required | acres/hr | L/acre | L/hr |
| 4-18-in. furrow plow | 75 |
2.8 | 4.5 |
12.5 |
| 6-18-in. furrow
plow | 130 MFWD |
4.2 | 5.1 |
21.6 |
| 8-18-in. furrow
plow | 160 | 5.6 |
4.7 | 26.5 |
| 12.5-ft field cultivator | 75 |
9.0 | 1.4 |
12.5 |
| 18-ft field cultivator |
105 MFWD | 13.0 |
1.3 | 17.4 |
| 37-ft field cultivator | 225 |
26.7 | 1.4 |
37.5 |
| 11-ft chisel plow |
75 | 60 |
6.4 | 1.5 |
| 15-ft chisel plow | 130
MFWD | 8.7 |
2.0 | 17.4 |
| 11-ft tandem disk | 60 |
6.4 | 1.5 |
9.9 |
| 15-ft tandem disk |
105 MFWD | 8.7 |
2.0 | 17.4 |
| 4-r-36-in. row crop planter | 40 |
5.6 | 1.2 |
6.8 |
| 6-r-30-in. row crop
planter | 60 |
7.0 | 1.4 |
9.9 |
| 12-r-30-in. row crop
planter | 105 MFWD |
14.0 | 1.2 |
17.4 |
| 4-r-36-in. minimum-till
planter | 60 |
5.1 | 1.9 |
9.9 |
| 6-r-30-in. minimum-till
planter | 75 |
6.4 | 2.0 |
12.5 |
| 8-r-30-in. minimum-till
planter | 105 MFWD |
8.5 | 2.1 |
17.4 |
| 25-ft grain drill |
130 MFWD | 4.7 |
4.6 | 21.6 |
| 35-ft grain drill | 160
MFWD | 14.9 |
1.8 | 26.5 |
| 12-ft presswheel drill | 75 |
6.6 | 1.9 |
12.5 |
| 20-ft presswheel
drill | 130 MFWD |
8.5 | 2.1 |
17.4 |
| 15-ft no-till drill |
130 MFWD | 6.4 |
4.6 | 21.6 |
| 20-ft no-till drill | 160
MFWD | 14.9 |
1.8 | 26.5 |
| 30-ft sprayer | 40 |
5.1 | 2.5 |
12.5 |
| 50-ft sprayer |
60 | 25.6 |
0.4 | 9.9 |
| 9-ft mower conditioner | 40 |
4.4 | 1.6 |
6.8 |
| 9-ft rotary mower/conditioner |
75 | 6.6 |
1.9 | 12.5 |
| Square baler | 40 |
4.4 | 1.6 |
6.8 |
| Round baler 1,000
lb | 60 | 3.0 |
3.3 | 9.9 |
| Round baler 1,500 lb | 60 |
4.4 | 1.6 |
6.8 |
| Large size square
baler | 130 MFWD |
16.3 | 1.3 |
21.6 |
| Round baler 1,000
lb/wrapper | 60 |
3.0 | 3.3 |
9.9 |
| 2-row forage harvester |
105 MFWD | 1.4 |
12.5 | 17.4 |
| Large forage blower | 60 |
| |
9.9 |
| Combine 4-r-30 in.
corn head | 190 |
2.8 | 11.4 |
31.8 |
| Combine 12-r-30
in. corn head | 275 |
7.6 | 6.0 |
45.9 |
| Combine grain head
20 ft | 220 |
6.8 | 5.4 |
36.8 |
| Combine grain head
30 ft | 275 |
10.2 | 4.5 |
45.9 |
| Combine soybean
head 15 ft | 220 |
4.5 | 8.2 |
36.8 |
| Combine soybean
head 25 ft | 275 |
7.4 | 6.2 |
45.9 |
Source: American
Society of Agricultural Engineers Standards, American Society of Agricultural
Engineers, 1999.
Factors to Consider in a
Custom Farmwork Agreement
Custom hiring is a business arrangement. Write
the terms of the arrangement in a formal agreement. If unwritten, the terms are
more likely to be misunderstood in the case of a dispute. While written custom
hiring agreements have not been common in the past, increased demands for nutrient
management plans, quality assurance programs and environmental stewardship records
give added incentive beyond the business benefits of written agreements. Consider
the following in a custom hiring agreement.
Timeliness
Significant
losses can occur if an operation is not started or completed on time. To facilitate
planning, include a schedule of operations for both parties in the custom hiring
agreement. Such a schedule would be subject to weather conditions and crop maturity.
Operations
Write
into the agreement the exact operations to be performed by each party and the
machine, materials and labour to be supplied by each.
Rate Schedule
Stipulate
the rate for each operation to be performed on the basis of acreage, time (hour,
day, week) or total operation performed.
Management
State that both
the custom operator and the owner will adhere to appropriate and accepted farming
practices in his or her respective part of the farming operations. The contract
provides an opportunity to clarify management roles and responsibilities, create
mutual understanding and provide a dispute resolution mechanism.
Environment
Matters
While the owner is ultimately responsible for activities occurring
on the property, regulatory authorities can charge any one of the owner, the tenant
farmer or the contract operator for causing environmental damage. It is the responsibility
of each party to understand his or her environmental responsibilities. Where the
custom farmwork operation carries the risk of an environmental spill, such as
in manure or pesticide application, it is important that a contingency plan exists
that identifies the containment and clean-up process, which party has the authority
to initiate the contingency plan and to which party the clean-up costs are assigned.
Terms of Payment
Stipulate terms of payment for custom operations.
Bill the client upon the completion of each custom operation, indicating actual
units (hours, acres, etc.) completed, the rate charged per unit, the total charge
and the date payment is due.
Termination
Include a minimum period
for notice of termination in a custom hiring agreement. State penalties, if any,
for termination or for failure to give appropriate notice of termination.
Other
Considerations
Insurance
A custom operator may be classified differently
from a farmer when insuring equipment. Be clear with the insurance company about
which role you are playing if considering doing custom work or renting out equipment.
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB)
Custom operators are
responsible for carrying appropriate WSIB coverage for their employees. The WSIB
issues Clearance Certificates to employers to document this WSIB employee coverage.
WSIB
coverage is optional for sole proprietors, partners, independent operators and
executive officers of a corporation.
A WSIB Independent Operator Ruling
documents that the custom operator is not considered to be an employee of the
farmer by the WSIB.
The WSIB deems the operator of the equipment to
be an employee of the farmer during the custom farmwork unless the custom equipment
operator has either a WSIB Clearance Certificate or a WSIB Independent Operator
Ruling.
Farmers should ask the custom operator to see a copy of a
WSIB Clearance Certificate or WSIB Independent Operator Ruling prior to the work.
If there is no Clearance Certificate or Independent Operator Ruling, custom operators
should itemize the labour component of the custom rate charge on the bill so that
the farmer can pay the required WSIB premiums on the equipment operator's labour.
For further information regarding WSIB responsibilities, contact the WSIB
at 1-888-259-4228.
Licences and Certifications
The custom operator
should maintain, as required, any regulated certifications or licences for the
equipment and equipment operators involved in the custom work.
Summary
Contracting
custom farmwork will continue to provide farm managers with an option to manage
machinery costs and technical skills. Developing clear custom farmwork contracts
is a benefit to both the farm manager and the custom operator.
This
Factsheet is intended as general information, not specific advice concerning individual
situations. Individual custom farmwork agreements should be discussed with your
lawyer. The Government of Ontario assumes no responsibility for persons using
this publication as a basis to draft a custom farmwork agreement or to set custom
farmwork and short-term equipment rental rates.
Averages shown in the tables
are a simple average of the rates charged in 2009 across Ontario as reported in
a survey of Ontario custom farmwork operators. Percentiles show the range of the
rates that were charged. There is no assurance that using the average rates reported
here will cover the cost of providing the service. Before setting prices, carefully
calculate all costs and returns.
References
The
author would like to gratefully acknowledge the permission given by the authors
of the following publications from which portions of this paper were developed:
Farm Machinery Custom and Rental Rate Guide 2000. Economics and Farm Management
Section, Sustainable Production Branch, Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food.
1999 Minnesota Farm Custom Rate Survey. Bill Lazarus, Extension Economist,
Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota Extension Service.
Acquiring Farm Machinery Services: Ownership, Custom Hire, Rental, Leasing,
2001. William Edwards, extension economist, and Vernon M. Meyer, retired extension
agricultural engineer, Iowa State University Extension.
Iron SolutionsTM
Eastern Canada Region Winter 2009 Official Guide. Dealer edition.
The
author also wishes to thank the custom farm operators who completed the survey
of rates charged in 2009.
This Factsheet was updated by John Molenhuis,
Business Analysis and Cost of Production Program Lead, Economic Development Division,
OMAFRA, Brighton, and originally written by Carl Fletcher, Strategic Business
Planning Lead, Economic Development Division, OMAFRA, Guelph.