In This Section |
Lease Agreements For Farm Buildings
Table of Contents
This Factsheet examines the major considerations in developing a lease agreement for crop and livestock facilities from both the landlord and tenant's points of view. A lease form to aid in the development of a lease arrangement is available in the Factsheet Farm Building Lease, Order No. 03-093. Section 1 - The Basics Of A Lease AgreementHuman Components Of A Successful LeaseAny form of business agreement requires mutual respect and trust. Leasing buildings or livestock facilities is no different. To be successful the lease arrangement must satisfy both the landlord and the tenant. Before entering into a lease both parties should consider more than just price. The compatibility of the landlord and tenant and the fairness of the lease are important considerations. The following is a list of characteristics commonly found in successful lease agreements:
| Top of Page | Advantages Of A Written AgreementWhile many farm lease agreements are verbal, there are advantages to putting an agreement in writing.
Table 1. Summary of Required, Recommended and Optional
Lease Items
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Item |
Useful Life (yrs.) |
Repairs (% of new replacement cost) |
|---|---|---|
| Livestock buildings | 15-25 | 1-3% |
| Livestock equipment | 5-10 | 3-5% |
| Grain storage, drying | 15-20 | 3-4% |
| Machinery and hay storage | 20-25 | 1-2% |
Calculating Variable Costs
Repairs and Maintenance - Unlike most other ownership
costs, repair and maintenance costs usually increase as a building or
other structure ages. Repair costs can be estimated as a percent of
new replacement value, to allow for changes in the costs of parts and
labour. Table 3 shows some suggested percentages for estimating
repair costs for various types of rental items. For older or well-used
items, use the high end of the ranges shown.
A more satisfactory method may be to keep a record of actual repair and maintenance costs incurred by the landlord during the lease period. Some tenants may be able to reduce repair costs by providing some or all of the necessary labour.
Other Operating Costs - Other operating costs such as water, fuel and oil, electricity or gas should be borne by the tenant, either directly or indirectly through the overall rental charge. The most accurate method is to actually measure consumption of fuel or other energy, perhaps through a separate meter. If electrical use cannot be metered separately, an estimate of its cost can be made based on the size of lights and motors involved and their hours of use.
| Variable |
Calculated Amounts
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Building Fixed Costs | ||
| 1 - Current replacement cost | $40,000 | |
| 2 - Total useful life | 20 years | |
|
3 - Average age during lease period |
13 years | |
| 4 - Years of life remaining (Line 2 - Line 3) (adjusted for condition) | 7 years | |
| 5 - Average value: (Line 1 x Line 4 ÷ Line 2) | $14,000 | |
| 6 - Amount of financing on the building | $ 0 | |
| 7 - Interest rate on financing | 7.0% | 0 |
| 8 - Depreciation rate per year and total amount (Line 1 ÷ Line 2) | 5.0% | 2,000 |
| 9 - Return on Investment (Line 9 x Line 5) | 4.0% | 560 |
| 10 - Insurance and taxes rate (Line 10 x Line 5) | 1.0% | 140 |
| 11 - Total Fixed Costs (Lines 7 + 8 + 9 + 10) | $ 2,700 | |
| Variable Costs (if paid by owner) | ||
| 12 - Repairs (% of replacement cost) (Line 12 x Line 1) | 2% | 800 |
| 13 - Utilities | 0 | |
| 14 - Total Variable Costs (Line 12 + Line 13) | $ 800 | |
| Total Costs | ||
| 15 - Total Annual Ownership Cost (Line 11 + Line 14) | $ 3,500 | |
| 16 - Cost per month (Line 15 ÷ 12 months) | $ 292 | |
| 17 - Total Cash Costs (Line 15 - Line 8 - Line 9) | $ 940 | |
| 18 - Cash Costs per month (Line 17 ÷12 months) | $ 78 | |
| Top of Page |
A partial budget format can be used to evaluate the cost benefit to the tenant of renting the facility. The tenant would compare the estimated added income and reduced expenses to any reduced income and added costs. Table 4 shows an example evaluation of a hay storage facility. Appendix 1 contains a blank worksheet, Table 7.
| Tenants Value in Renting a Hay Storage Building | ||
| 1 | Added income from using the building | $ 1,000 |
| 2 | Reduced costs from not having to own the building | $ 3,920 |
| 3 | Reduced or lost income which could be earned by investment in another building or asset | - |
| 4 | Added cost from using the building, not including the rent | $ 600 |
| Added Value In Renting [Line 1 + Line 2 - (Lines 3 + 4)] | $ 4,320 | |
Line 1 - Tenant expects added income because stored hay will result
in better quality feed
Line 2 - Annual ownership of a building would be $3,920. (See Line 15
of Table 3)
Line 3 - Income would not be reduced by renting the building
Line 4 - Cost of travel to the location to store and retrieve feed
Establishing A Rental Rate
In the end a rental rate is negotiated between the landlord
and tenant. Use a combination of methods below to arrive at the final
price.
| Top of Page |
Total Costs of Landlord
The total of all ownership and operating costs can be used
to estimate a rental charge for the whole year or a portion of the year.
If a structure or piece of equipment is rented for less than a full
year, the annual ownership cost estimates should be reduced proportionately.
Or the total can be divided by a typical annual production level to
estimate a charge per unit of production or use, such as the cost per
pig finished.
Keep in mind that many structures may not attract sufficient rent to pay for all ownership and operating costs, due to their fixed location or a low demand for their services. However, rental rates should at least cover operating costs and added wear to make it worthwhile for the landlord to enter into a lease. When selecting or negotiating with a potential tenant, characteristics such as reliability, experience, honesty, financial condition, availability, possession of skills and equipment for making repairs or improvements, and likely longevity should be considered.
A lower rental charge may be acceptable in exchange for strong performance in these other areas.
Commercial Rates
In some cases the same service being offered by the landlord
may be available from a commercial source at an established price. An
example is storage for grain. A tenant may not be willing to pay more
for grain storage than the rate at which it can be obtained at a local
elevator, unless convenience is a factor. In fact, on-farm storage rates
tend to be below commercial rates because the tenant must assume the
risk of loss, perform the labour and management functions, and use loading
and unloading facilities, which may be less convenient. Nevertheless,
commercial rates serve as an unbiased reference, which reflect current
costs, and supply and demand conditions.
Property rental agents can help determine an appropriate rental rate for a farm home or other building. Some commercial livestock companies may pay standard rates for the use of feeding facilities. An advantage of using commercial custom rates as a guide to rental charges is that they reflect average per unit costs at an efficient level of use.
| Top of Page |
Farm Records
A third approach to setting a fair rental value is to find
out how much it costs other farming operations to own and operate the
same facilities. Benchmark data, if available, could provide detailed
cost data. If possible, use data for the same enterprise and size of
operation as for the facilities under consideration. Try to include
all the ownership and operating costs that the landlord of the facilities
will pay. Keep in mind that records may not include interest (opportunity)
costs on the landlord's own capital.
Many private production record services also provide group summaries with detailed enterprise cost data. Generally only members or users of the service have access to this information.
While record data from other farms may not accurately reflect costs for a particular set of facilities, they at least indicate typical opportunity costs for the tenant of not owning his/her own buildings and equipment. These three approaches can provide a starting point for negotiating an acceptable rental rate. The actual rent agreed on will probably fall somewhere among these values, depending on each person's bargaining position and the demand for and the supply of similar property in the area.
| Top of Page |
Several areas of responsibility need to be discussed and agreed on before the leasing period begins. How these are handled may affect the amount of rent that is paid for the facilities.
Most buildings and equipment will need some maintenance and repairs eventually. At the beginning of the lease, the tenant and landlord should jointly inspect the rental property to be sure everything is in satisfactory working order. In general, it is the landlord's responsibility to have the facilities in good condition when the lease begins. Some leases contain a 30-day trial period at the beginning during which the landlord agrees to repair any part of the facility that is not performing satisfactorily. This is especially important when equipment has not been used recently.
Next the landlord and tenant need to agree on how future repairs and maintenance costs will be handled. Lubrication, sharpening, adjustments to controls, and replacement of fasteners, controls, and small equipment are usually the tenant's responsibility. This ensures that such repairs are done quickly and also motivates the tenant not to abuse equipment. When major building components need to be fixed or replaced, the landlord generally pays the cost. The tenant may provide labour and expertise to perform the repairs, when possible.
Either party can provide portable items such as feeders and waterers, heaters, gates and panels, skid loaders, and feed grinders. Naturally, the rental rate will be higher if the landlord provides such items. The lease agreement should list who will supply specific items. In any case, the owner of such equipment usually pays major repair costs. Some leases allow the tenant to charge repairs up to a maximum dollar amount without prior approval, but the landlord must approve amounts over this limit before they are carried out. Another possible lease provision is to allow a third party arbitrator to decide if major repair costs are caused by normal wear and tear or by tenant misuse of the buildings and equipment.
An adequate supply of water is essential for livestock facilities. Determine the source of the water and condition of pumps and waterlines at the beginning of the lease. Include the value of the water system when estimating a fair rental rate. Repairs and maintenance can be handled as described in the previous section.
| Top of Page |
If the water supply becomes inadequate due to drought or other problems, the lease needs to state who is responsible for obtaining supplemental water. When the problem is due to natural causes, some tenants and landlords divide the cost of obtaining extra water. This may include reimbursing the tenant for hauling costs. Or, the landlord may pay the cost of the water while the tenant transports it.
If water is supplied by a utility, such as a rural water system, the variable cost is usually borne by the tenant. If the cost or use cannot be metered directly, some other method of measuring monthly consumption must be determined.
Manure collection and disposal is becoming an increasingly important issue in livestock production. It is the landlord's responsibility to see that leased facilities meet all applicable laws and zoning regulations related to livestock wastes. Responsibilities of the landlord and tenant under municipal nutrient management bylaws or the Nutrient Management Act 2002 must be clearly outlined within the lease agreement. The question of who removes manure and to whose land it is applied is best answered according to practical considerations, and included as part of any nutrient management plans. Who has the proper equipment and who has cropland that can utilize the manure are good places to start. Distance of cropland from the livestock facility is also a factor.
If the same party both disposes of the manure and benefits from it, then probably no payment needs to be considered. However, if the tenant applies the manure on the landlord's land, for example, then the tenant should probably receive payment for performing this service or have the rental charge for the facility reduced accordingly. Times and locations for spreading must also be set. Table 5 shows the cost of custom rates for manure handling, as reported in the 2000 Custom Rate survey. For more detailed information on custom rates by provincial region refer to the OMAFRA Factsheet Guide To Custom Farmwork and Short-Term Equipment Rental, Order No. 02-215.
| Top of Page |
| Unit | No. of farms reporting | 2000 Provincial average |
Percentile |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15th | 85th | ||||
| Loader only | hr. | 28 | $44 | $33 | $60 |
| Spreading only | hr. | 19 | $48 | $37 | $60 |
| Loading and spreading | hr. | 34 | $82 | $55 | $121 |
| Surface irrigated | 1000 gal. | 4 | $7 | $6 | $8 |
| hr. | 3 | $167 | $115 | $220 | |
| Tanker spreading - surface applied | 1000 gal. | 9 | $8 | $5 | $10 |
| hr. | 15 | $98 | $61 | $135 | |
| Trucking | hr. | 3 | $110 | ||
Generally, each party is responsible for insuring their own property. This means the landlord would carry comprehensive insurance on buildings, equipment, fences and other property, as well as general liability insurance. These costs are built into the rental charges. The tenant would need to insure livestock, feed, and their own equipment.
| Top of Page |
The date that rental payments are due should coincide with the periods in which the tenant receives cash income. Annual or semi-annual payments are common, although, for a continuous livestock production facility, monthly payments may be reasonable. If a facility is used for only part of a year, annual rental charges should be reduced accordingly. An exception might be a grain bin, which generally can be used only once a year, even if the grain is stored for just a few months.
Some rental rates for buildings and equipment are based on the actual level of usage rather than a fixed annual amount. For example, a swine finishing facility may be rented for a set rate per head finished, or a machine shed may be rented for so much per square foot of space used. In these cases, the landlord and tenant need to agree on how the level of usage will be determined
| Top of Page |
Table 6 and 7 are located in Appendix 1. They are blank worksheets that a landlord and a tenant can use to calculate their costs and returns.
The Building Rent Calculator - an Excel computer worksheet that contains all the worksheets in this Factsheet can be found on the OMAFRA Website www.OMAFRA.gov.on.ca
Building lease arrangements provide the both the landlord and the tenant with the opportunity of utilizing their assets in the most effective way possible. Good communication and the development of a written lease allow each party to benefit from the arrangement.
This publication is intended as general information and not as specific advice concerning individual situations. It outlines some of the legal and tax considerations of leasing arrangements but it should not be considered as either an interpretation or complete coverage of the Income Tax Act or the law affecting building rental arrangements. The Government of Ontario assumes no responsibility towards persons using it as such. All land rental arrangements should be discussed with your farm management advisor, accountant or lawyer before they are signed.
This Factsheet was written by Rob Gamble, Finance and Business Structures, Program Lead, Agriculture Division, OMAFRA, Guelph. Portions of this Factsheet were taken from the North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 214 entitled Rental Arrangements for Farm Buildings and Livestock Facilities, by William Edwards, Iowa State University and Fred Benson formerly University of Minnesota. The author would like to gratefully acknowledge their permission to do so. The author would also like to thank Douglas C. Jack, Barrister and Solicitor,Fergus, Ontario for his assistance in the preparation of the sample lease agreement.
| Top of Page |
Business Structures Series
Farm Corporations, Order No. 01-057
Farm Partnerships, Order No. 02-047
Farm Business Joint Ventures, Order No.02-069
Forming a Cooperative, Order No. 02-019
New Generation Cooperatives, Order No. 02-017
Land Leasing Series
Crop Share Lease Agreements, Order No. 01-067
Flexible Cash Lease Agreements, Order No. 01-069
Land Lease Arrangements, Order No. 01-065
Lease Agreements for Cropland, Order No. 01-071
Lease Agreements for Pastures, Order No. 03-091
Farm Management and Taxation Series
Budgeting Farm Machinery Costs, Order No. 01-075
Canada Pension Plan, Order No. 01-029
Farm Business Insurance, Order No. 00-041
Field Crop Budgets (annual), Publication 60
Guide to Custom Farmwork and Short-Term Equipment Rental, Order No.
02-015
Leasing Farm Equipment, Order No. 01-003
Ontario Farm Record Book, Publication 540
Options for Farmers Dealing With Financial Difficulty, Order No.
00-051
Taxation on the Transfer of Farm Business Assets to Family Members,
Order No. 03-023
Troubleshooting Your Farm Business, Order No. 00-107
| Top of Page |
|
|
Variable |
Calculated Amounts
|
|---|---|---|
| Building Fixed Costs | ||
| 1 - Current replacement cost | $ | |
| 2 - Total useful life | ___ years | |
| 3 - Average age during lease period | ___ years | |
| 4 - Years of life remaining (Line 2 - Line 3) (adjusted for condition) | ___ years | |
| 5 - Average value: (Line 1 x Line 4 ÷ Line 2) | $ | |
| 6 - Amount of financing on the building | $ | |
| 7 - Interest rate on financing | % | |
|
8 - Depreciation rate per year and total amount (Line 1 ÷ Line 2) |
% | |
| 9 - Return on Investment (Line 9 x Line 5) | % | |
| 10 - Insurance and taxes rate (Line 10 x Line 5) | % | |
| 11- Total Fixed Costs (Lines 7 + 8 + 9 + 10) | $ | |
| Variable Costs (if paid by owner) | ||
| 12 - Repairs (% of replacement cost) (Line 12 x Line 1) | % | |
| 13 - Utilities | ||
| 14 - Total Variable Costs (Line 12 + Line 13) | ||
| Total Costs | ||
| 15 - Total Annual Ownership Cost (Line 11 + Line 14) | $ | |
| 16 - Cost per month (Line 15 ÷ 12 months) | $ | |
| 17- Total Cash Costs (Line 15 - Line 8 - Line 9) | $ | |
| 18 - Cash Costs per month (Line 17 ÷12 months) | $ | |
| Top of Page |
| 1 | Added Income from using the building | |
| 2 | Reduced costs from not having to own the building | |
| 3 | Reduced or lost income which could be earned by investment in another building or asset | |
| 4 | Added cost from using the building, not including the rent | |
| Added Value in Renting [Line 1 + 2 - (Lines 3 + 4)] |
$
|
|
| Top of Page |
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: